Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi Spokesman Criticizes Senate Vote
Breitbart ^ | April 26, 2007

Posted on 04/26/2007 3:25:21 PM PDT by Kaslin

BAGHDAD (AP) - An Iraqi government spokesman criticized the U.S. Senate vote to begin withdrawing U.S. troops by Oct. 1.

"We see some negative signs in the decision because it sends wrong signals to some sides that might think of alternatives to the political process," Ali al-Dabbagh told The Associated Press.

He spoke after the Senate passed legislation Thursday that would require the start of troop withdrawals from Iraq by Oct. 1. The House passed the same bill a day earlier, and President Bush has promised a veto.

The legislation is the first binding challenge on the war that Democrats have managed to send to Bush since they reclaimed control of both houses of Congress in January.

"Coalition forces gave lots of sacrifices and they should continue their mission, which is building Iraqi security forces to take over," al-Dabbagh said. "We see (it) as a loss of four years of sacrifices."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: dhimmicrats; iraq

1 posted on 04/26/2007 3:25:21 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

But he’s on our side. The Dems don’t vote for our side.


2 posted on 04/26/2007 5:08:46 PM PDT by westmichman (They cried "Peace, peace," but there is no peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bump for later reference.


3 posted on 04/26/2007 5:15:45 PM PDT by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Gee, how convenient. The flag waving Democrats have a pull out date of October 1st, just in time for the Presidential Elections.

The Democrats voted in lockstep, just like the mind numbed robots that they seem to be. Putting the interests of their party ahead of those of their country.

And of course, they have the Queen that leads them.

Iraq is going to end like Vietnam, an American withdrawal and a massive bloodbath afterwards. This time, there is no good reason.

4 posted on 04/26/2007 5:50:13 PM PDT by karlmarx1957 (Pelosi --- queen of the traitors --- why couldn't they give her the Titanic instead of a jet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

>>The legislation is the first binding challenge on the war that Democrats have managed to send to Bush since they reclaimed control of both houses of Congress in January.<<

Wrong. Only the overriding of the veto would make it “binding.”

Also - Consider how little the Democrats have done since January.

They are engaged full-time, on taxpayer’s money, in political campaigning in two areas: 1) pimping to their hard leftists on Iraq and 2) holding innumerable “hearings” which are nothing more than witch hunts.


5 posted on 04/26/2007 7:55:59 PM PDT by mtntop3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson