Posted on 04/23/2007 10:01:49 AM PDT by John Cena
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821941/posts
My mother said he’ll be roaming all right, searching the world for any available thongs.
I think if the Dems could get away with it, they'd choose Obama, Edwards or Gore over her.
We'll see..
sw
“By this time next year, Hillary’s presidential aspirations might be dead and buried.”
I think you could say that about all of the candidates. The campaigning started right after the 2006 elections — way too early. These earlybird candidates are going to crash and burn from over-exposure and from overkill. The electorate is going to get sick and tired of seeing them 24/7. Look for darkhorse candidates in both parties.
JMHO
So might be bill. Never underestimate the sympathy factor.
At least a third of the elected repubs act like RINOs so is there going to be a difference?
Scene 1. Baraka Hussein Obama Jr announces he’s running for president.
Scene 2. Hillary Clinton is forced to move quickly and announces she’s running for president.
Scene 3. Al Gore presents enviro-fiction movie and wins two Oscars.
Scene 4. Hillary’s popularity tops out and starts declining as people get tired of the voice and the same messages said twelve different ways regarding how socialism will ‘save’ the USofA.
Scene 5. The truth about Baraka trickles out and he starts the downward turn in popularity. Baraka cannot ‘save’ the day.
Scene 6. Grassroots Democrats ask the ‘savior of the earth’ to run for president.
Scene 7. Al Gore is Democrat presidential nominee.
Scene 8. Oprah tells her audience to vote for Al Gore, the ‘savior of the earth.’
Scene 9. * we’ll have to wait to see how scene 9 turns out.
It is true. In hindsight, what you say about him is right, but it didn't have to do with organization, as Dean had the moonbat/moveon.org on his side. Aside from Al Sharpton and the blacks, who else had any organization that early in 2004? Dean was the first antiwar candidate.
Anyway, that year Dean didn't have to go up against Hillary (as far as we know, LOL! There was talk about Dean as the anti-Clinton). Dean was done in by his own hubris and believing what the polls were saying. Noisy moonbats does not an electorate make.
I think you're right. I don't think Obama will be allow himself to be intimidated by her.
The first two weeks of August is the best.
You may now wash your mouth out with soap...and for the record, this soccer mom will NOT be voting for her, and neither will my radically left feminist sister in law or her friends. They cannot stand Hillary either.
may i ask why?
(i still say that hillary! will be the next president of the U.S. and forgive me, i still say that the obnoxious, pathological, murdering left will have a collective orgasm that will shake the earth.)
I agree. Gore will show up to siphon voters from Edwards (”electable”) and Obama (”sentimental”). He’s being manipulated into doing this, and Hillary will assemble a nice set of ads on Gore’s failures and “poof” there she will be in front!
Leni
I'm envisioning Gore crying for his mommy after being demolished in the debates by Fred Thompson.
Any Republican in the presidency is better than any democrat. Period.
The reason is that even a liberal Republican has certain things he will NOT push, like abandoning the military. In addition, he will draw from a bench of Republicans for cabinet positions.
A democrat president will do those things that we don't like in liberal Republicans, in spades, PLUS actively work for things that a Republican would never do, such as abandoning Iraq, sucking up to Kyoto type environmental rules, punitive taxes on producers, and stifling speech on the internet and talk radio.
So it doesn't matter to me WHO the democrats pick, because the entire apparatus of their party is consumed with destroying our way of life.
A democrat president can do a lot of harm in a short amount of time. Example: Jimmy Carter.
I want her to be the nominee...she is far more beatable that Gore or Edwards.
My point was that I was tweaking the Guiliani supporters because of their slavish devotion to the meaningless daily polls this far out from anything resembling a real vote.
They tell us over and over that we need to look at TODAY’S poll, because it PROVES that only Guiliani can beat Clinton, and therefore, we need to vote for Guiliani.
So, I was just having a go at them by pointing out that TODAY’S poll blows apart their presumption of Clinton as the opposition nominee.
I do think Edwards is actually the biggest danger to Hillary, because the unions and non-moonbatty democrats see him as the only electable one. That might change if Gore gets in the race.
ANY of those four are a danger to the country. I will vote for whoever gets the Republican nomination. Even McCain, whom I dislike intesely, or Tancredo, who I think is a one-issue doofus. And there you have it.
She has all the charisma of a Trashcan. Maybe less??
Pray for W and Our Troops
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.