Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2008 Democratic Presidential Primary Poll (HILLARY HAS LOST THE LEAD!!)
Rasmussen Reports ^ | April 23, 2007 | Scott Rasmussen

Posted on 04/23/2007 10:01:49 AM PDT by John Cena

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: John Cena

Obama is in a different league when it comes to public speaking. Don’t know aqbout the rest of it, but Clinton couldn’t even get the lead in community theater while Obama could be on Broadway.


61 posted on 04/23/2007 10:39:51 AM PDT by RightWhale (3 May '07 3:14 PM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moose2004
going to be a dem primary war like nothing we’ve ever seen.

You mean the news is finally going to be fun to watch again? Yea-hoo! The MSM's daily torpedoing of G-Dub is getting me nauseous.

62 posted on 04/23/2007 10:41:22 AM PDT by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost

No, that scenario won’t happen. But it is really early, and the Clinton hit machine hasn’t BEGUN to slime Barack the “Magic Negro.”


63 posted on 04/23/2007 10:43:03 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
Reports are that even her own DAUGHTER prefers Bill to her mother

I'd sooner hug week-old road-kill myself.

64 posted on 04/23/2007 10:43:37 AM PDT by Sicon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Question for the (remaining) Rudy-bots:

If we have to abandon our conservative principles to vote for Guiliani based on current polls that show that he can beat Hillary; then how does this poll, showing Hillary won't even be the nominee, square with your presumptions?

Or are some of these polls less meaningless than others?

65 posted on 04/23/2007 10:45:16 AM PDT by kevkrom (A vote for Guiliani is a vote to kill conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sicon

When I read that Hillary intends to shuffle ol Bill off to all corners of the earth, I thought: “this is just her way to keep him out of the White House on a regular basis”...Somehow, I don’t think ‘ol Bill is going to “go along” with being the “gopher” for her Presidency...


66 posted on 04/23/2007 10:46:06 AM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
As for the ‘Clinton machine’....lets not get too carried away. The best the so called ‘machine’ could do was over a decade ago, gaining Bill Clinton 49 percent of the vote in a three candidate race featuring a unelectable to national office GOP candidate (Bob ‘its my turn, damnit!’ Dole).

A Green Party Gore could spell disaster for the Dems. It could pull enough votes away from the GOP that they could even elect Dole this time.

A Big-Business Country-Club Independent Bloomberg could spell disaster for the GOP if they don't nominate a BB-CC and go with a more conservative condidate. It could pull enough votes away from the GOP that the Dems could elect Dumbo -- the elephant or the clown from Illinois.
67 posted on 04/23/2007 10:47:24 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

I don’t see a faux republican like Bloomberg gaining any support outside of the weird political enviroment that is New York city.

let alone a gun grabber, which is most certainly is.


68 posted on 04/23/2007 10:48:49 AM PDT by Badeye (Like it or not, we live in a time when Hero's are required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
Perhaps the most interesting question is whether Hitlary would settle for #2.

I don't see Hillary giving the #2 nod to Obama. He adds little to her campaign. She would already get much of the Black vote anyway. She would probably already get Illinois, too (favorite daughter). So Obama adds nothing to her campaign demographics.

If Obama did win the nomination, Hillary would probably not accept the #2. Rather, she would return to the Senate and take the leadership role from Harry Reid. Senate leader would be more power than VP (unless Obama showed some serious health problems or decides to take a stroll through Fort Marcy Park -- then, all bets are off). If Obama did win the nomination, I doubt that he would ask Hillary to be #2.
69 posted on 04/23/2007 10:53:39 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

I agree with all of that. Which is why I made my original point — Clinton won’t get away with using her politices of personal destruction like she/he has in the past. Grab a chair and pass the popcorn.


70 posted on 04/23/2007 10:56:31 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: All

I know yellow-dog Dems in my state (WV) who would not only NEVER vote for Hillary, but they will actually vote FOR any Republican against her just to try to make it a humiliating loss. That’s how strong the sentiment is against her.


71 posted on 04/23/2007 10:57:54 AM PDT by GOP_Proud (How covert was Valerie Plame at the CIA? Her top-secret code name was "Valerie Plame." ...Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: John Cena
Rasmussen Reports also monitors underlying party identification trends and has found a substantial shift away from the GOP over the past six months.

Not good news regardless who the 'rats nominate.

72 posted on 04/23/2007 10:59:39 AM PDT by newfreep ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." - P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Proud

What is the difference between a yellow-dog Dem and a blue-dog Dem?

Isn’t the blue-dog Dem the same as the Reagan Democrat who was the Southern Democrat?

And when did the donkeys become dogs?


73 posted on 04/23/2007 11:01:53 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: rob777
That’s too bad because I would like to have her as an opponent in the General Election.

Me too. They joy of watching the witch's face as she reads her concession speech , that will be priceless.

74 posted on 04/23/2007 11:03:12 AM PDT by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LS

not to me. Richardson is the guy who scares me as Hillary’s VP, because his pull with hispanics puts the western states in play, and makes margins otherwise tighter in states with hispanic demographics.

the DNC has the polling data to be sure - they know Obama’s chances in the general election. So if it looks like he is going to win the primary (ala Dean), watch for Gore to get it and make a late surge.


75 posted on 04/23/2007 11:04:07 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
You've been consistent.

I think we'll all be amazed and disgusted at the depth to which politicing and media reporting will sink in '08. I've not been wrong over the past 10 years in thinking the worst of the Clintons or the left...only when I've thought, "They surely can't support him after that?!?"

Can she be beat, in the primary or the general? Sure. I don't see Obama is the guy to do it. He's never been in this kind of battle before, I'd bet.

Negative ratings have never been an issue for Hillary...she'll just raise the other guy's negatives more. She's a mud slinger and brawler by nature, pure appetite born of resentment and ambition. She's a child of the worst excesses of the '60s and '70s, radical to the core. She is, IMO, evil. She wants admiration and worship, but she'll settle for being feared, and for power...for now.

I think the left is primarily motivated by BDS. I think they aren't looking for a positive message. If they are, then I'm wrong and Obama is the nominee...but I don't think so.

You give the party more credit than I do. I'm up here in the People's Republic of King County, WA.

76 posted on 04/23/2007 11:06:14 AM PDT by gogeo (Democrats want to support the troops without actually being helpful to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
That is what I think also: Al Gore is the answer.

How can Hillary have 50% favorable rating and Barak Obama even more? What is there to like about those them and Edwards, all wimps?

77 posted on 04/23/2007 11:06:43 AM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

I’ve always wanted to visit the northwest.


78 posted on 04/23/2007 11:10:53 AM PDT by Badeye (it's Badeye Derangement Syndrome! LOL PRICELESS. BE will get a kick out of this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose

I agree. I wonder what the poll numbers would have been had he been included. I have been saying for quite a while Gore will be the Dem nominee. For all the inevitability talk about Hillary, in the minds of many Gore was robbed in 2000 so he has a greater claim. And I think he will be tough to beat.


79 posted on 04/23/2007 11:25:57 AM PDT by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we write in marble. JHuett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LS

I’m not so sure she will win the nomination, but if she does and puts Obama on her ticket, I think they will certainly lose. I just don’t enough people will vote for two historic firsts on the ticket. BTW, I just bought your book.


80 posted on 04/23/2007 11:28:28 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson