Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Edwards Takes Campaign To Michigan [The Pink Sapphire in Mich. Calls for US Surrender in Iraq]
The Post Chronicle ^ | 23 April, 2007 | Staff

Posted on 04/23/2007 1:54:20 AM PDT by Roy Tucker

John Edwards Takes Campaign To Michigan By Staff Apr 23, 2007

U.S. Democratic presidential hopeful John Edwards told an audience in Detroit the United States must get out of Iraq as soon as possible.

Edwards called the Iraq War a "bleeding sore" as he spoke to more than 2,000 Democrats at a dinner Saturday, The Detroit News reported.

"America needs to be leaving Iraq, this is very, very simple," said Edwards, 53, who is running for the Democratic presidential nomination. "We have had multiple surges, none of them worked."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: bleedingsore; breckgirl; defeatocrats; democrats; dhimmicrats; iraq; johnedwards; mcmansion; silkypony; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Man, this guy voted for the invasion and unlike President Bush called Saddam an "imminent threat." He flops as much as the bangs on his hairdo.
1 posted on 04/23/2007 1:54:22 AM PDT by Roy Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Roy Tucker

There’s the Rat resolve! That’s what warriors are made of! When the doing gets tough, take your ball and go home.

Good job, Pinkie! :P


2 posted on 04/23/2007 1:57:20 AM PDT by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roy Tucker
This is why John Edwards is known as the Pink Sapphire Pink Sapphire Edwards
3 posted on 04/23/2007 2:00:53 AM PDT by Roy Tucker ("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality"--Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress

His commitment to the War on Terror could be called a Pinkie Promise.


4 posted on 04/23/2007 2:01:46 AM PDT by Roy Tucker ("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality"--Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Roy Tucker
"We have had multiple surges, none of them worked."

I have hardly posted since Harry Reid started the Democrat approach to the war--"The war is lost."

I still find it difficult to read any other article, this issue is so astonishing to me. (I know, it shouldn't be, but it is.)

What in hell are the democrats doing?

Please, no glib comments about them wanting American soldiers to die--I don't believe that. What I DO believe is that they accept that some will die in order to get them all home, and this incredibly nearsighted goal (get the Americans people to love Democrats because they ended the war) is what's now driving them.

They WANT a US defeat, so they can "bring pride back to America" the way Reagan did.

Ugh, I can't go on, this just...gets me nuts.

5 posted on 04/23/2007 2:03:33 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Anti-socialist Bostonian, Anti-Illegal Immigration Bush supporter, Pro-Life Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roy Tucker

If anyone would know about bleeding sores, it’s be a guy like John Edwards (aka “Silky Pony”, aka “Pink Sapphire”, aka “Breck Girl”).


6 posted on 04/23/2007 2:03:58 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Iran delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

I think they are reliving the Viet Nam era. Most of them were too young or not involved in the anti-war demonstrations and now in positions of power, they see themselves as having another opportunity to be anti-war heroes. I don’t think it has as much to do with wanting to be like Reagan but rather equating the current Bush administration with Richard Nixon and wanting to bring him down.


7 posted on 04/23/2007 2:08:21 AM PDT by Roy Tucker ("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality"--Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Roy Tucker

I do think they want to be like Reagan, because as much as they loathe him they know the American people really responded to his “Morning in America” attitude, of bringing us out of “darkness.” The Dems want to be seen as new Reagans—and gain some “Hillary Republicans” if they can—and not as new Carters, though of course they adore him. (And would love to name him Sec. of State in their dreams.)


8 posted on 04/23/2007 2:15:41 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Anti-socialist Bostonian, Anti-Illegal Immigration Bush supporter, Pro-Life Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

What’s a Hillary Republican. I have never met one..EVER.


9 posted on 04/23/2007 2:18:58 AM PDT by Roy Tucker ("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality"--Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Roy Tucker

Edwards isn’t going anywhere unless Hillary or Obama dies.


10 posted on 04/23/2007 2:20:01 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roy Tucker

Me neither. The point I was making is that they need some crossover, like Reagan Democrats.


11 posted on 04/23/2007 2:21:41 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Anti-socialist Bostonian, Anti-Illegal Immigration Bush supporter, Pro-Life Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Roy Tucker

Mystic Edwards, the psychic ambulance chaser.


12 posted on 04/23/2007 2:24:00 AM PDT by Zon (Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yeah, Edwards wants to surrender Iraq, what a union whore. And he’s whining again for this mythical “universal” health insurance.

No wonder NC didn’t want him.


13 posted on 04/23/2007 2:37:14 AM PDT by Baladas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zon

A little off-topic but I saw the other day where Pink Sapphire opposed the recent Supreme Court ruling banning Partial Birth abortions. Yet, he thought nothing of pretending to channel a baby in distress as he sued doctors for malpractice during childbirth.

I wonder if he could channel a baby almost born who gets her brains sucked out while she is alive?


14 posted on 04/23/2007 3:00:22 AM PDT by Roy Tucker ("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality"--Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

The Good Lord is merciful and mighty.


15 posted on 04/23/2007 3:01:33 AM PDT by Roy Tucker ("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality"--Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
Well Darkwolf377, I don't know if it is a glib comment or not. I don't believe its superficial to say that the democrats welcome the body count. They can't count up to 3000 when it comes to the dead on 9/11. Whatever the number of dead is from all the islamic murderers killing Americans, they can't find that number and count up to it. They sure as hell can count up to the number of dead American warriors in Iraq. Their fellow travelers can sure show up at the funerals of the honored dead to besmirch them and what they stand for. They can come up with those numbers as they demand the return of a draft so they can count drafted dead.

What else could their motives be other than to defeat America? They own defeat, they revel in defeat, they are marxist pragmatists who will use any means, including the honored dead, to achieve their ends. They are willing to accept casualties over there, and they are willing to accept casualties here in order to promote their agenda which is total domination of US.

I am tired of listening to people like Sean Hannity bleat on about the "once great democrat party with men like FDR, Harry Truman, Scoop Jackson, and blah blah blah". If any nobility can be ascribed to people like that, their time has long passed. The current democrats, spawn of the '60s radical leftists, hate America, they want us defeated. They do not care about our once and future greatness. There was a time when, even if democrats believed the s#it that people like Hairless Reid and the punk Edwards feel free to utter openly, they kept it to themselves. Now they blow it out to a compliant media and people like you don't want to believe it. Believe it. We are in a war with radical fascist islam, we are in a war with their fellow travelers in America called the democrat party.

The real question is "what the hell are the Republicans doing?" Want to do something about it? Demand at every opportunity that the Republican party either lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way as I do at every opportunity.

16 posted on 04/23/2007 3:02:18 AM PDT by RushLake (I neutered my dog; now he's a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RushLake; Darkwolf377
I don't believe its superficial to say that the democrats welcome the body count.

Both of you should take some time and watch "HERITAGE FOUNDATION: "How Modern Liberals Think"" with Evan Sayet.

17 posted on 04/23/2007 3:09:26 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RushLake
What else could their motives be other than to defeat America?

I'm not disagreeing with this point at all. Read what I wrote: I agree with you 100%.

But I don't think democrats are monsters. Sorry, they're human beings, many of them Christians, many of them gun owners.

I have the bad fortune of living in an area crammed with liberals, and when I discuss this with them, I rarely find people who actively despise the military personel--they hate the military, sure, but they patronizingly see soldiers as dupes and...well, you know the drill.

I seriously don't believe the ideas you articulate in your post can get through the dense matter of their skulls. I talk to them about this stuff and they get all emotional, ditching any rational argument in favor of emotion. And they see the deaths of American soldiers as Bush's fault, and their efforts to end the war are liberation--of the soldiers, from Bush.

The dems I encounter seem to think it's regrettable, but more US soldiers may have to die to end the larger killing of Iraqis and Americans.

I think they're sincere, and tragically wrong. But I rarely encounter Americans who WANT Americans to die. I just think it's too convenient and too tempting to pretend they're all demons and inhuman. If only they were, but they're flesh and blood people, just like the racists and bigots we all know.

18 posted on 04/23/2007 3:10:28 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Anti-socialist Bostonian, Anti-Illegal Immigration Bush supporter, Pro-Life Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

No offense, but I don’t care much for the Heritage Foundation, and they’re hardly capable of an unbiased view here.


19 posted on 04/23/2007 3:12:12 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Anti-socialist Bostonian, Anti-Illegal Immigration Bush supporter, Pro-Life Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Just watch it. You’ll be pleasantly surprised and will be nodding your head in agreement.


20 posted on 04/23/2007 3:20:15 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson