Posted on 04/22/2007 11:24:04 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
oh, excuse him your honor, he meant to say yooooooooouttthhhhhs...
We had a perp here in Pittsburgh a couple of years ago who shot a guy waiting for his valet parked car. The perp didn’t even know the guy. One of the perps neighbors said: He was such a good boy, I remember those beautiful dimples when he smiled. There are some real maroons out there!
Good God. Here is a suggestion to this dummy...perhaps because his friend engaged in an unprovoked assault on another person with the intent to rob him of his money and/or life, and the person defended themselves?
Good greif.
(slime-ball criminals of ethnicity are called youths by the media-maggots)
Just like Rodney King was only called a motorist .....
_________________________________________
It's not surprising.
At several Virginia Tech memorials, they've added Cho's name.
Liberals place no value on life or truth. “Quality of life” is a great excuse when they talk about killing infants or old folks but a drug addicted woman beater has a life worth living. His abused girlfriend is to be pitied because her abuser is now dead due to his armed assault gone wrong. Obviously “quality of life” is a hollow platitude to the left to be used as a convenient tool to promote the kind of killing that they prefer.
The unspoken conclusion is, "if you survive the encounter, and still feel like helping us shuffle papers".
Most people think that hard-boiled reporters for a major metropolitan newspaper look like this:
In reality, the reporters for the San Francisco Chronicle look like this:
So Officer Roland, when rappers pull out their guns, what do you do? Do you say drop 'em? Do you shoot them out of their hands? Or, do you unload everything you got? Oh, and you say you have permission by the law to shoot them, but we don't. Why doesn't someone ever ask the cops, who say defending yourself is not a good thing to do, some real questions.
Law enforcement isn’t going to protect these people, why don’t they get it?
LEOs will be there with the chalk, the police tape, and the toetags for clean-up.
ie "You can't know for sure an armed robber will open fire until he opens fire." - Oakland Police
You should take your act on the road, officer. The folks in Blacksburg, VA would love it. You might add for their benefit "Just because someone is shooting people right and left you can't say for certain that he won't decide to stop. Just go about your business like nothing's happening."
I went back and read the original article.
I am very glad the perp is dead. He was a gang-banging drug pusher who was arrested twice for selling marijuana. If San Francisco was not so soft on crime, he would have been behind bars and unable to rob a pizza parlor.
And liberal sheep keep spouting that we have so many innocent people in prison only for harmless drug crimes. Well, here is another person that SHOULD HAVE BEEN in prison for drug crimes, only he escalated to armed robbery.
He’s dead, so all’s well that ends well. I’m sure the woman who he beat so hard that her head went through a wall will miss having her face re-arranged by his loving fists.
All in all, the article should have read...
“A violent drug-dealer with a long rap sheet from beating women to narcotics, tried to add armed robbery to his resume yesterday but was stifled in his attempt when he received fatal wounds from the righteous store owner who had his own gun and shot in defense of self and family including his infant son.
While no charges will be pressed in the righteous self-defense shooting, the elitist police stated they would have prefered the shop owner not had a gun and remained a defenseless victim, ripe for slaughter, as occurred recently at Virginia Tech.”
San Francisco is a festering loony-bin.
hahaha, thanks for clearing that up. Should inform the Chron of that, it looks like they are searching for clarity.
More than just being against the mere use of handguns for defense, San Francisco voted to BAN all handguns from within the city limits, making it illegal to own a handgun in your home just the way D.C. does.
Even the SF Mayor agreed that the ban was unconstitutional and would never become law, but he liked the way it sent a message. However, the idiots voting for the ban honestly believed it would become law.
The vote to ban guns went something like 70% pro ban and 30% against. That is a HUGE outcome in any election, which goes to show how insane the VAST MAJORITY of San Franciscans are.
I live in SF as well and I walk the streets and the people don’t look insane for the most part. Then 70% vote to ban guns in violation of the 2nd Amendment and the only conclusion to be drawn is, MOST people in San Francisco are just plain whacked.
And they wonder why nutcases shoot up kids on college campuses... to get famous throught the dumb ass press.
I think the writer would prefer the victims line up and wait to be shot.
Answer ?: "There comes a time in the history of every people when they become so pathologically soft and tender that they actually side with those elements of their society that harms them, i.e. criminals..."- A Great Historian 1888
Seems to a common term used by police to describe thugs, as in; "The gentleman fired at us and we returned fire killing him instantly."
LOL, San Fransicko.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.