[Just sayin]

You said that people should have the "choice."

You bet I did, and then I went on to show how choice can be respected that does not terminate a pregnancy with the result of ending a life. A choice that gives both sides of this argument what they seek. Care to disagree with me there?

Persuit of happiness? You mean like not being pregnant? That kind of happiness? The fact you say I advocate taking a life PROVES AGAIN that you are NOT reading the post and you are diectly telling an UNTRUTH. So Stop your LYING.

Your mindset of not reading and comprehending what I wrote shows clearly. I will say it again, go read it again. What you are saying is not what I said. Not even close. I have said nothing about supporting abortion as it stands now, in fact I said quite clearly I oppose it and seek just as much as you to end that.

You knee jerked and every time you post crap like in this post you show it more and more. Try reading the post.Then try understanding it.

[wagglebee]

You bet I did, and then I went on to show how choice can be respected that does not terminate a pregnancy with the result of ending a life. A choice that gives both sides of this argument what they seek. Care to disagree with me there?

The ONLY choice the pro-aborts care about is that infanticide continues.

Persuit of happiness? You mean like not being pregnant? That kind of happiness?

Huh? If a woman doesn't want to be pregnant, she should keep her legs closed.

The fact you say I advocate taking a life PROVES AGAIN that you are NOT reading the post and you are diectly telling an UNTRUTH. So Stop your LYING.

You said that women should be allowed to "choose" abortion.

[LexBaird]

You bet I did, and then I went on to show how choice can be respected that does not terminate a pregnancy with the result of ending a life. A choice that gives both sides of this argument what they seek. Care to disagree with me there?

I will. What you offered was not a "choice". It was a pie-in-the-sky speculation: Personally, I would like to see a day come where a pregnancy can be removed from a female who does not wish to remain pregnant without ending the pregnancy itself. I find this to be an outcome where both sides of this seemingly endless debate can gain what it is they truly seek. Would this not be a good thing?

It would be a wonderful world if everyone could have a pony and ice cream, too, but that isn't the real world. Right now the choice for a pregnant woman is carry the child to term or kill him. Those two and no other. Do you equate those two, morally or ethically? Do you see the choice to kill as a vital "freedom" to maintain?

[metmom]

IBTZ?

A newb calling people liars and telling them they’re posting crap?