Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just sayin
You bet I did, and then I went on to show how choice can be respected that does not terminate a pregnancy with the result of ending a life. A choice that gives both sides of this argument what they seek. Care to disagree with me there?

The ONLY choice the pro-aborts care about is that infanticide continues.

Persuit of happiness? You mean like not being pregnant? That kind of happiness?

Huh? If a woman doesn't want to be pregnant, she should keep her legs closed.

The fact you say I advocate taking a life PROVES AGAIN that you are NOT reading the post and you are diectly telling an UNTRUTH. So Stop your LYING.

You said that women should be allowed to "choose" abortion.

4,805 posted on 04/23/2007 9:37:04 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4792 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

There you go lying again. I presented an idea where no end of life occurs. So then, why do you keep saying that in relation to what I wrote?

A woman should kep her legs closed you say? Yeah, that’s right, a man plays no part in the process huh? Sheesh.

Post where I said a woman should be alloed to choose abortion. Copy it and paste it. Let’s see it.


4,818 posted on 04/23/2007 9:46:25 AM PDT by Just sayin (Is is what it is, for if it was anything else, it would be isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4805 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson