I will. What you offered was not a "choice". It was a pie-in-the-sky speculation: Personally, I would like to see a day come where a pregnancy can be removed from a female who does not wish to remain pregnant without ending the pregnancy itself. I find this to be an outcome where both sides of this seemingly endless debate can gain what it is they truly seek. Would this not be a good thing?
It would be a wonderful world if everyone could have a pony and ice cream, too, but that isn't the real world. Right now the choice for a pregnant woman is carry the child to term or kill him. Those two and no other. Do you equate those two, morally or ethically? Do you see the choice to kill as a vital "freedom" to maintain?
I will ask you the same thing I ask others who make the point you make. Wasn’t organ transplantation considered “pie in the sky” at one time too? You bet it was. Be honest with yourself and admit that.
I fully understand what the choices are right now, that is precisely why I seek another one. Am I to think you only want to leave it as those choices and not seek another?