I will ask you the same thing I ask others who make the point you make. Wasn’t organ transplantation considered “pie in the sky” at one time too? You bet it was. Be honest with yourself and admit that.
I fully understand what the choices are right now, that is precisely why I seek another one. Am I to think you only want to leave it as those choices and not seek another?
Let's put this another way. I laud your forward-thinking for the long-term. That said, today, at this very minute, do you think the Constitution guarantees the right to have an abortion? Yes or no will suffice.
Apples and oranges. Before organ transplants, people simply died. They had no option to do something like choose to kill someone to resolve their condition. Yeah, it might be nice if babies didn't need the womb of the self centered to mature in, but it doesn't exist and isn't being researched AFAIK. It also has nothing at all to do with the so-called "choice" issue. If you cede the "choice" of life and death decision, what's to keep the woman from choosing termination of her child over your decanting tech, simply for convenience? If you can deny that choice, why not the choice to carry to term?