I cannot say I agree with that statement. I think it is deeper than that simple statement.
Well, I think you're wrong.
Do you agree or disagree that a person can be 100% opposed to Abortion as it pertains to their own choices and still understand that everyone else's choices are their own to make and to be accountable for?
I totally disagree. It's like saying, "I wouldn't commit murder/rape/arson/armed robbery, etc., but I think it would be wrong to tell someone else not to."
Do you agree or disagree that removing choice, in general, is a bad thing?
Let's see, abortion claims as many American lives EVERY SINGLE DAY as the terrorists killed on 9/11/01, so yes I fully support removing the "choice" to murder innocent Americans.
Personally, I would like to see a day come where a pregnancy can be removed from a female who does not wish to remain pregnant without ending the pregnancy itself.
Women already know how not to become pregnant. We don't need to do any Mengele-style experimentation for "alternatives."
As far as the rest of your post, my position on abortion is well documented here. I WILL NOT EVER CONCEDE that 3000+ murders a day is something to negotiate about.
It is al;most like you didn’t even read my post. I am sad that you think arbitrary removal of choice is preferrable to findinf a beter one.
Just remember you support removing choice when itisyours that is removed.
What you refuse to concede is that there is any choice valid except your own. Nancy Pelosi would agree with that position. So would Harry Reid.
You have made it clear that you don’t seek any solution but your own and you don’t care about anyone else’s choice but your own. Please do not cry when others treat you in that same fashion, as they are only treatingyou with yourown standards.