Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy finds chilly reception in Colorado
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners ^ | April 17, 2007 | RMGO

Posted on 04/20/2007 8:26:41 PM PDT by MtnClimber

Hosted at the mansion/home of former Denver Nuggets star Kiki Van De Weghe, the event was meant as a strict money gatherer for Giuliani's frontrunner campaign.

Only one problem: Giuliani is adamantly anti-gun, with a record to prove it.

Being the first in a series of collaborative efforts between Rocky Mountain Gun Owners and the National Association for Gun Rights, we wanted this one to be a surprise (to both the organizers of the event and the attendees). Rest assured we'll let you know when there is another event.

A small number of hardcore RMGO activists met outside the Cheeseman Park mansion, where valet attendants waited for the rich (tickets were $4000+ apiece for the personal discussion) to meet with the former New York mayor.

Dressed in nice clothes, with smiles on our faces, we handed out this flyer (http://www.nagr.org/Giuliani.pdf) to the fatcats as they walked in.

Thinking we were part of the event staff, they happily took the flyer as we said "If you care about your right to own firearms you'll want to see the incredible anti-gun record of Mayor Giuliani's."

Responses always vary, but few refused the flyer. Even John Elway read it, and seemed to be shocked by the label of "Liberal" on a Republican.

You can read the Rocky Mountain News account of the event here.

Friends, this kind of thing hurts politicians. It's extremely demoralizing to a politician and their staff when people aren't fawning all over them, trying to shake their hand, get a picture with them, and "get access" to someone with the kind of star power a frontrunner for president generates.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: banglist; chilling; communism; elitist; giuliani; guncontrol; rudy; stoprudy2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last
To: takenoprisoner; CTSeditor
Not all Republicans carry, use, or own guns. And most voters could care less what RMGO thinks. ”


Not all, but most Republicans in most states believe that the Constitutional right to own guns, shall not be infringed.

Keep bashing your only hope for 2008.

Hope?,he's is our worst nightmare.
81 posted on 04/21/2007 9:41:45 AM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
since when did some gun nut’s blog belong in the News/Activism forum of FR?

*************

Gun nut?

Oh, the horror! Maybe someone should alert the Mods.

Quickly.

82 posted on 04/21/2007 9:50:30 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58; CTSeditor
Interesting phrase considering you could have said Keep bashing our only hope.

*************

Heh. Good point, Graybeard.

Welcome to Free Republic, CTSeditor.

83 posted on 04/21/2007 9:53:32 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

By gosh, I think you get it! There are no conservative Republicans that I know of in the NYS GOP. There might be some conservatives in the NYS Conservative Party who care about our Second Amendment rights, but none in the GOP who, when it gets down to the nitty-gritty, would vote to preserve our gun rights.


84 posted on 04/21/2007 10:13:21 AM PDT by izzatzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

It’s not possible that both of us are from Colorado Springs. It’s just not possible.


85 posted on 04/21/2007 11:02:34 AM PDT by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Blind Eye Jones
The Dems have already fought their way into both the House and Senate and have done it shamefully.

Actually, I would argue that the Democrats have done so shamelessly, not shamefully.

Other than that, I do tend to agree... we need a streetfighter this time around. This is not the year we need Reagan... this year, we need Nixon.

86 posted on 04/21/2007 11:40:50 AM PDT by liberty4alland4ever (I pledge to support the GOP nominee for President in 2008, whomever that is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

LOL, looks like Rudy got pwn3d a little bit.


87 posted on 04/21/2007 11:44:35 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Let's all post whatever blogs we find in whatever FR forum we want.......

You were probably having a miserable time a few weeks ago when people posted all of those "blog" entries about the Gathering of Eagles in the News and Activism forum.

88 posted on 04/21/2007 11:45:40 AM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Melas
>>>>It’s not possible that both of us are from Colorado Springs. It’s just not possible.

I agree. I think you're from the outer limits of the twilight zone, AKA. Liberalville.

89 posted on 04/21/2007 11:46:03 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: CTSeditor
Keep bashing your only hope for 2008.

Rudy Giuliani is not the only hope for 2008. Instead, he's one of the Republicans most likely to lose. When Republicans win the White House, they do it by getting crossover votes from conservative "Reagan Democrats." These are voters who like the Democrats on economic issues but are disgusted by the Democrats' embracing of liberal social issues. What is Rudy Giuliani? He's a Republican who has a reasonably conservative record on economic issues and is socially liberal. He loses the votes of these "Reagan Democrats" on all parts of his message.

If Rudy Giuliani wins the nomination, he will lose the general election. He holds extremist liberal views on abortion. He holds extremist liberal views on gun control. His refusal to cooperate with INS on deporting illegal aliens is part of the attitude of leniency that led a police officer to let one of the 9-11 hijackers go free after stopping him on a traffic violation and seeing that he was past his time on a visa. Wearing a dress once wouldn't necessarily keep people from voting for him, but his doing it so many times makes him appear to be another liberal fruitcake. All of these things will cause him to lose the votes that a Republican needs to win the general election.

To make matters worse, many of the people who will refuse to vote for him will be discouraged and will stay home rather than vote. Their staying home means that the GOP will not have the votes needed to retake Congress. Rudy Giuliani will be a disaster to the GOP on all levels.

If we love our country and believe that the Republican party offers the best path forward for the country, we will not support Rudy Giuiani.

Bill

90 posted on 04/21/2007 11:55:26 AM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
Hope?,he's is our worst nightmare.

Really? I'll tell ya, personally, The Screech becoming President is my worst nightmare. Followed by Al Gore Being President. Follow that up with John Murtha becoming President.

In fact, I would toss just about every Democrat, Socialist, Green, Communist, Aryan National, Ku Klux Klansman and member of the touring company of Cats into that catagory before I would do the same with Rudy Giuliani.

Speaks to priorities, I guess.

91 posted on 04/21/2007 11:55:26 AM PDT by liberty4alland4ever (I pledge to support the GOP nominee for President in 2008, whomever that is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: no dems
I one other person in that dorm at Virginia Tech would have had a concealed handgun permit with a handgun, the death toll would have been much lower.

I agree with your sentiment, but Norris Hall is a classroom, lab, and office building. Norris Hall is not a dormitory at all. As far as we know, no one saw Cho in the dormitory (Ambler-Johnson). I know it's a small point, but it's a mistake that bothers me when I hear people making it.

Otherwise, I agree completely. If a grad student in one of the labs were carrying, he could have come upstairs with his firearm ready. If Dr. Granata had been armed, he would have had an excellent chance of stopping Cho. Dr. Granata's military training likely would have made him much better in armed combat than some evil-crazed kid. He probably recognized the sound of gunfire and responded to try to save lives. If he'd only had the right tools, maybe the incident could have ended sooner.

Bill

92 posted on 04/21/2007 12:07:18 PM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: liberty4alland4ever
Just because Rudy put an R behind his name doesn't make him much different.

In Idaho gungrabbing is gun grabbing by any name.

Rudy said it himself:

"Most of Bill Clintons policies are almost exactly like mine"

We can't allow someone like Bill Clinton to head the Republicans, sorry not with my vote. I have worked to hard to hand it over now. I'd rather have a democrat to blame than have people start believing the Republicans are like that.
93 posted on 04/21/2007 12:07:48 PM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
I agree. I think you're from the outer limits of the twilight zone, AKA. Liberalville.

Things are easy to say. Proving them however often proves to be difficult. Not that you're the type to be bothered with trivialities like proof or even truthfulness.

I've stated my voting record here on FR many, many times, and you're the first and perhaps only poster to have found it liberal.

94 posted on 04/21/2007 3:48:36 PM PDT by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium

The gun control issue is the canary in the coal mine. Was this country established for individual liberty and freedon, or was it established so politicians could rule over their subjects. I know which camp Rudy falls into and I don’t want to be his little slave boy.


95 posted on 04/21/2007 8:10:52 PM PDT by MtnClimber (Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
I know which camp Rudy falls into and I don’t want to be his little slave boy.

Rudy for sure believes in controlling the people.
96 posted on 04/21/2007 8:51:59 PM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium

Don’t I know it. Rudy treated the law abiding and the crooks with the same iron fist.


97 posted on 04/22/2007 6:11:35 PM PDT by MtnClimber (Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson