1 posted on
04/20/2007 9:17:19 AM PDT by
Fennie
To: Fennie
2 posted on
04/20/2007 9:23:41 AM PDT by
Paradox
(Secular Conservative, thank God!)
To: Fennie
we had the Thresher and the Scorpion, so we’re not infallable.
3 posted on
04/20/2007 9:23:45 AM PDT by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
To: Fennie
As I understand it, I believe that the fuel that the Russkies use in their torpedoes is unstable.
To: Fennie
Is it design flaws, operator errors or a combination of both?
5 posted on
04/20/2007 9:27:07 AM PDT by
magslinger
(“gun free school zone” = “victim-rich environment”-L98Fiero)
To: Fennie
The Kursk tragedy in the Barents Sea happened on August 12, 2000 due to unknown reasons Anybody know what happened to the Kursk Conspiracy Theory regarding a purported collision with the American sub USS Toledo ?
Or maybe they just need to get rid of the screen doors.
BUMP
6 posted on
04/20/2007 9:28:53 AM PDT by
capitalist229
(Get Democrats out of our pockets and Republicans out of our bedrooms.)
To: Fennie
I think their biggest problem is they are doing a lot more with a lot less. This is just a casual observance, but it seems like the Russians these days have a lot fewer career military than in the past, not to mention their budgets in the tanker for some things. I’ve read that they’ve even had problems with paying their service members. If that’s the case, it’s a wonder they have anything that doesn’t end up on the bottom.
7 posted on
04/20/2007 9:29:03 AM PDT by
af_vet_rr
To: Fennie
The largest difference by far is the Dollars (or Rubles) spent on maintenance.
Pure and simple.
9 posted on
04/20/2007 9:31:38 AM PDT by
roaddog727
(BullS##t does not get bridges built)
To: Fennie
If the same problem had sunk all 3, he would have had a better case for design failure. Given that his 3 examples occured in 3 different locations (stern, missle tube, bow), I’d look to training issues rather than to design faults.
12 posted on
04/20/2007 9:36:58 AM PDT by
PAR35
To: Fennie
Are Russian submarines ‘dry’?
13 posted on
04/20/2007 9:37:03 AM PDT by
null and void
(To Marines, male bonding happens in Boot Camp, to Democrats, it happens at a Gay Pride parade...)
To: Fennie
The screen doors didn’t shut tight enough..........
14 posted on
04/20/2007 9:38:02 AM PDT by
Leatherneck_MT
(Won't vote for a liberal in the democrat party, won't vote for one in the Republican party. Ever)
To: Fennie
They run their submarines over 7 years before they put them in drydock.
19 posted on
04/20/2007 9:48:23 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
( Freep Fox they drop the ball on GOE)
To: Fennie
In before the obligatory “screen door” post ... oh, wait, my bad.
To: Fennie
This headline reallh isn’t accurate. The US
has lost more subs than most are aware of.
Including one that had recently (at the time)
reported a Soviet Task Force, where one
wasn’t supposed to be.
22 posted on
04/20/2007 9:59:23 AM PDT by
NickatNite2003
(From the Man from Hope" to the wife who snarls "Abandon All Hope!")
To: navynucmom
PING....ping....PING....ping
23 posted on
04/20/2007 9:59:42 AM PDT by
Roccus
(We finally consign Marxism to the dustbin of history, and it turns out it’s a recycling bin.)
To: Fennie
gured out why Mexican subs sink. Adobe melts under water.
.....Bob
24 posted on
04/20/2007 10:02:09 AM PDT by
Lokibob
(Some people are like slinkys. Useless, but if you throw them down the stairs, you smile.)
To: Fennie
Three words:
Safe Sub Program
Instituted in the 60’s (I believe) following several accidents. Reengineered the US Navy sub program with a emphasis on safety above all. Largely credited as a great success in technical and cultural change leading to amazing improvement.
25 posted on
04/20/2007 10:02:49 AM PDT by
Wiseghy
("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
To: Fennie
32 posted on
04/29/2007 3:39:08 AM PDT by
Fennie
To: Fennie
..................a good start.
33 posted on
04/29/2007 4:03:53 AM PDT by
ALASKA
(IT'S NOT ROCKET SURGERY......................Don't just do something, STAND THERE!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson