Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/19/2007 8:56:47 AM PDT by 2dogjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2dogjoe

Right, a fair hearing, that’s a good one! This will be by a bunch of moonbats who still aren’t sure Bush did not fly the planes into the WTC himself.


2 posted on 04/19/2007 8:58:38 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2dogjoe

Whacko leftist Navarrette shilling for Gonzales—Again!
Weird.


3 posted on 04/19/2007 8:59:10 AM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2dogjoe

Gonzalez has bumbled this like a first-class idiot. He is way over his head in the AG post.


4 posted on 04/19/2007 8:59:53 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2dogjoe

A fair hearing from the Dimocrat star chamber ... sure ... there should NOT be a hearing at all in the first place. Why Bush and company are giving these “people” the time of day on this issue is beyond me


5 posted on 04/19/2007 9:01:51 AM PDT by clamper1797 (and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2dogjoe
Will Gonzales get a fair hearing?

At the rate Gonzales is shooting himself in the feet at the Senate hearing, he doesn't have any toes left.

His display has been pathetic. He has raised significant questions about his competency for the position he holds.
7 posted on 04/19/2007 9:09:58 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2dogjoe

The non-scandal scandal. I hope the Dims get a LOT of egg on thier faces for finding nothing was wrong.


12 posted on 04/19/2007 9:36:23 AM PDT by Pistolshot (Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2dogjoe
1) US Attorneys serve at the pleasure of the President.
2) US Attorneys can be replaced for any reason, or for no reason.
3) What in the heck is an “improper reason?”
13 posted on 04/19/2007 9:40:34 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2dogjoe

“We’re gonna give you a fair trial, followed by a first-class hanging.”


16 posted on 04/19/2007 9:49:38 AM PDT by CFC__VRWC (Go Gators! NCAA Football and Basketball Champions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2dogjoe
Navarrette: Will Gonzales get a fair hearing?

Does the Pope crap in the woods?

Is a bear Catholic?

Is Helen Thomas a hottie?

17 posted on 04/19/2007 9:51:47 AM PDT by N. Theknow ((Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2dogjoe
Then, they said he lied to the media

What the he!! Who gives a damn about the media. What are they, the new FBI. If I had a chance, I would lie like he!! to this bunch of rotten crap heads. Hail, Hail, the media, more powerful than superman, faster at lies than a speeding bullet, etc. etc.

18 posted on 04/19/2007 9:52:26 AM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2dogjoe

9th circut court of appeals to follow?


20 posted on 04/19/2007 10:24:27 AM PDT by showme_the_Glory (No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody want a peanut.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2dogjoe

Will he? No.

This is an investigation into a case where NO law was broken.


21 posted on 04/19/2007 10:25:12 AM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2dogjoe
The democrats have shown no interest in being fair, and the ranking Republican is Arlen Specter.

Not much chance of a fair hearing.

The fact that there is a hearing at all considering that past administrations have fired such appointees for no other reason that the could shows that this has nothing to do with fairness. It's purely political grandstanding.

It's the majority of the Judiciary committee that should be forced to resign for their actions.

Gonzales should resign for other reasons, but not for anything relation to these firings.

22 posted on 04/19/2007 11:19:31 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson