Posted on 04/18/2007 11:54:41 AM PDT by doug from upland
Read the Appellate Brief for background, particularly beginning at page 50 --- APPELLATE BRIEF
PETER PAUL AND HILLARY: The Smoking Gun Has Been Uncovered!
After fighting a two-year battle that included heated requests to the U.S. Attorney in New York, Peter Paul and his counsel, the U.S. Justice Foundation have finally received copies of videos made in Paul’s offices during 2000. Broomstick One is going to finally be grounded.
This smoking gun video taped evidence of crimes being committed by Hillary Clinton, which may have been withheld from all the judicial and congressional investigations conducted from 2001 - 2005, will now be released as part of the first ever documentary on Hillary Clinton. The evidence is being added to the rough cut of the documentary “EXPOSING HILLARY” (new working title). The new release date is expected to be some time in May. Plausible deniability for Hillary is going to be gone forever. Citizens should be outraged that this key piece of evidence that shows Hillary's direct involvement in coordinating and soliciting illegal expenditures and donations for her Senate campaign was withheld from all those judicial and FEC investigations that exonerated Hillary for lack of evidence!
Despite the mainstream media conspiracy of silence in reporting on the multi-million dollar election and business frauds Hillary directed to win her 2000 senate seat and her re-election, depositions in Paul v Clinton will be take place this year. That is not good timing for Hillary.
The first ever civil fraud case against a Senator and President, (see HILLCAP.ORG) which caused the "red herring" indictment and trial of Hillary's finance director and the only fine assessed against her campaign for election law fraud, is now about to reveal its own "Rodney King style video" catching Hillary red handed in the act of violating criminal election law statutes!
Hillary's sworn declaration in the case--which elevates the denials and non-denials that Hillary was famous for in front of the Whitewater grand juries to new heights of contempt for the legal process--will be shown to be a perjured sworn statement.
She is not going to avoid the inevitable, whether she is brought back into the case as a defendant or as a witness. Hillary is going to be grilled under oath and confronted with a large body of evidence. This time, "I don't recall" isn't go to fly. Not this time, Hillary.
Those who have followed the sordid tale of how Hillary convinced and coerced Peter Paul to spend more than $1.2 million (between $1.6 and $2 million) for her 2000 Senate campaign know that Hillary has supervised the filing of four false FEC reports, her campaign treasurer admitted to deliberately hiding over $721,000, and the FEC fine was $35,000.
The mainstream media has paid no attention to the FEC General Counsel's second report, which was issued on Sept. 30, 2005. Within the report was the following:
The commission previously voted to take no action with regard to Senator Clinton pending the investigation of this matter because the complaint and responses provided no basis to dismiss the complaint outright or to open an investigation. Any potential liability of Senator Clinton would be based on whether she knowlingly accepted prohibited or excessive in-kind corporate contributions. Because the investigation has shown that Clinton for Senate did not accept any "advancements" of prohibited or excessive funds from the other participants, it would appear that Senator Clinton similarly did not accept any illegal contributions. Therefore, we recommend that the Commission find no reason to believe that Hillary Rodham Clinton violated any provision of the Act or regulations in connection with this matter, and close the file as to her.
Pursuant to Title 2 section 437 of the U.S. federal code, which states: "Any person who knowingly and willfully commits a violation of any provision of this act which involves the making, receiving, or reporting of any contribution, donation, or expenditure aggregating $25,000 or more during a calendar year shall be fined under Title 18, or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both."
Criminal sanctions come into play when the aggregate amount totals $25,000. In Paul’s case, the amount was 50 times that amount.
Hillary's counsel, David Kendall, has maintained for several years that Hillary has fully cooperated with the investigation. Well, Mr. Kendall, are you ready for the smoking gun? It will be the shot heard 'round the world in 2007 and will change everything for the woman who believes she is destined to be our queen.
Evidence will be shown that proves Hillary’s direct involvement in the money contributed by Paul. Despite Hillary’s denials and obfuscations, it is going to be shown that Hillary’s actions made all of the money donated by Paul a hard money contribution. The limit at the time was $2,000, the amount Paul contributed in the form of a check at the Spago luncheon he sponsored and hosted.
One of the concert headliners was Cher, who was not a volunteer or friend of Hillary that perhaps could have created a gray area. Per Hillary’s own admission, she had never before spoken with Cher. She directly solicited Cher’s in-kind contribution, the value of which has never been declared.
Hillary knows the law well. That is why she declared the in-kind services of her friend, the famous photographer Annie Leibovitz. She knew it had to be declared. In typical Clintonesque fashion, of course, Hillary underreported the value of the photographer’s services. Leibovitz charges $25,000 for such services.
Evidence will prove that all of the money contributed by Paul was for the direct benefit of Hillary’s campaign. It all had to be declared as hard money, and Hillary knew that was the case.
There has been a great deal of controversy regarding the recent firing of U.S. attorneys. What should happen to a U.S. attorney who may well have obstructed justice by withholding evidence to protect Hillary? What should become of the former Chief of Public Integrity, Judge Noel Hillman, who prosecuted David Rosen instead of Hillary Clinton and Andrew Grossman?
bump for later
Great read!........Can’t wait for the indictments / subpoenas to come just at the right time! Sometimes the wheels of justice turn slowly for a reason. This is a good reason..........
You need to figure out how to clearly explain in one short paragraph (or 20 second sound bite) exactly how Hillary broke the law. Since that is apparently all this nation of idiots can tolerate or handle.
I don’t know if there will ever be an indictment. My hope all along was to put out enough info to mortally wound her campaign. If she were indicted, it would be icing on the let them eat cake.
FROM THE GENERAL COUNSEL’S REPORT: Any potential liability of Senator Clinton would be based on whether she knowlingly accepted prohibited or excessive in-kind corporate contributions.
We now have the irrefutable evidence.
I’ve always had a feeling that this deal could ultimately sink Hitlery and her partner in crime, WJC.
It was very disappointing that she got removed from these proceedings earlier but they just won’t seem to go away.
Maybe this time the backdoor deals and corruption of our justice system will be exposed. Since Hillary is a great danger to the country and has negatives near 50%, I would not be surprised if this becomes a quiet way for the Democrats to dump her.
DFU, I hope your confidence and enthusiasm is justified. I’m quite jaded about any malfeasance by the Clintons - the media just will not give it the legs necessary. The Justice Department better have a very, very strong backbone.
My confrontation with Kendall in a parking lot outside Los Angeles Superior Court will be in the video. It was fun.
I understand and appreciate the position of the naysayers. That’s okay. We shall see. As I write, Peter is watching another amazing video of their discussions. Her declaration that essentially claims she barely knew Peter (Peter who?) will be shown to be a total fraud. She will be confronted with all of it during her deposition.
LORD, GOD ALMIGHTY,
WE ASK YOU LORD, PLEASE INSURE THAT THIS GETS MAXIMUM AIRING EVEN IN THE MSM.
PROTECT ALL THOSE AND ALL THE EVIDENCE GOING FORWARD. BRING IT TO MAXIMUM PULICITY AND CAUSE IT TO MAKE A HUGE FUROR FOR A LONG PERIOD IN THE PUBLIC ARENA. CAUSE THIS TO BLOW HER CAMPAIGN OUT OF THE WATER AND OFF THE PLANET.
We ask, Lord that you protect the folks working so hard for the truth to be known and the fitting punishments to be applied. Protect their lives and their families.
Protect all the evidence very thoroughly. Insure that multiple validated copies are in diverse locations.
Please in sure, Lord that the proper judges and jury members are involved.
If possible, Lord, cause HARXIST to go absolutely berzerk admitting in a demonized rant on the witness stand her complicity in this and a long list of other major crimes. Cause the lid to come off the whole KLINTOON HOUSE OF EVIL CARDS.
Cause so much publicity and so much evil to be exposed that even the KLINTOON’S 3rd and 4th and 5th level goons are running for cover to far flung foreign countries. Let those inclined to suicide leave detailed signed diaries documenting the Klintoons evils, in Jesus’ Name.
May all who feel so inclined pray in agreement.
DFU, while I appreciate all the hard work you (and many others) have done in exposing the mendacity of Hillary, there is No Way In Hell that the Bush "Justice Department" is going to indict her.
It's just not going to happen. I'll put any amount of money against that that anyone would care to name. There is something weird going on between Bush and the Clintons, and it has been since he was elected.
What’s your assessment, personally, of this latest, Doug?
You need to figure out how to clearly explain in one short paragraph (or 20 second sound bite) exactly how Hillary broke the law. Since that is apparently all this nation of idiots can tolerate or handle.
= = =
Good point.
And the rest of us need to flood all the news idiots with it on paper and in emails relentlessly.
forgot to ping Doug
You need to figure out how to clearly explain in one short
paragraph (or 20 second sound bite) exactly how Hillary broke the law. Since that is apparently all this nation of idiots can tolerate or handle.
= = =
Good point.
And the rest of us need to flood all the news idiots with it on paper and in emails relentlessly.
Now that's a bad naked . . .
bttt
Better stock up on Garlic, Wooden Stakes, Silver Bullets and Wolfbane...............and some Tanna Leaves just in case......
Clinton stacked courts. Far Left Congress. Who is going to go after her? Who can get a conviction? Who names the investigation committee, Nancy?
There is evidence of Hillary’s involvement in the gala. It is compelling. The evidence was never presented to the FEC because it was withheld by a US Attorney. The FEC exonerated her and accepted the Grossman conciliation agreement without having the evidence. We are going to light some fires here. At some point, there is going to be a reporter who wants to win a Pulitizer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.