Posted on 04/18/2007 10:19:13 AM PDT by InfantryMarine
You East Coast Eagles -- mount up!!
http://www.gatheringofeagles.org/forum/index.php?sid=8a28581b563722eacf53b3c4d97fe39f
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:54 am Post subject:
Next A.N.S.W.E.R. event - 5/23, USCG Academy, New London, CT
At the US Coast Guard Academy's graduation ceremony - Wednesday May 23, 2007 at 9am:
"Bush will be speaking at the graduation ceremony of the Coast Guard Academy at 31 Mohegan Ave. in New London on Wed. May 23rd. Join with students, soldiers and veterans, impeachment and anti-war activists to protest. Initiated by the A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition."
http://answer.pephost.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ANS_homepage
www.americanpatriotcouncil.com
From ANSWER PAGE:
Bush will be speaking at the graduation ceremony of the Coast Guard Academy at 31 Mohegan Ave. in New London on Wed. May 23rd. Join with students, soldiers and veterans, impeachment and anti-war activists to protest. Initiated by the A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition.
TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION: Portland, ME: 207-439-5800; Boston, MA: 857-334-5084; Plymouth, NH: 603-801-3762 New Paltz, NY: 845-255-5779; New York, NY: 212-694-8720 Cape Cod Area: 508-432-0545; New Haven & Hartford, CT: 203-404-9965
I despise these people. The graduating cadets don’t need this, and even more, their families and friends don’t need this.
EAGLES UP!
Looks like something up your way if you can get the morning off.
[Mr] T
The students at the Coast Guard Academy are going to protest? Wasn’t Bush president when they applied?
“Hello, we’re from A.N.S.W.E.R. and we’re here to ruin what should be one of the most memorable days of your life. But we’re more important than you.”
Yea, I was also wondering about the “students”. Must be some boiler plate press release. Thankfully they won’t be allowed in the Academy.
Also, why protest the Coast Guard. Don’t they remember that during Katrina they were the BEST around. The CG might just let New Orleans sink next time.
[Mr] T
Not gonna be able to make this one.... going in for surgery the day before....
This posted on GOE yet?
CT PING! Eagles up!
So long as we have large numbers of dedicated FReepers & GoE members, if only a few can make an event as this, we will rain on their parade. But the more the merrier.
[Mr] T
The Coast Guard should arrest the whole crowd of A.N.S.W.E.R. disruptors, put them on a barge, tow it out to sea and scuttle it.
Then we’ll see how appreciative and apologietic A.N.S.W.E.R. can be.
[Mr] T
bump for later
The Coasties should ignore anyone sitting on top of A.N.S.W.E.R buildings/offices screaming/pleading for assistance when an emergency arises.
Hey, Maxine Waters (CA-D), Sheen Family..Are ya still proud to be marching/attending anti-war protests with ANSWER?
Communist ANSWER = CANCER
Posted on 02/28/2003 3:42:25 PM EST by dware
Exposing the Anti-War Movement, Part I: MoveOn.org (You Don’t Know Jack!)
by David Ware
NOTE: The following information was obtained through the efforts of the Citizens for Fair and Balanced Funding (CFBF) Committee here on Free Republic. Though the goal of CFBF is to provide research into the activities of the anti-war groups & their funders, the following presents compelling evidence that the Leftist Extremists in America are using the war effort as a front for an all out war against President Bush and the Conservative movement which is sweeping America today. If you would like to support the efforts of CFBF, please email David Ware (warehouse@gvii.net).
Ever played the smash hit game, “You Don’t Know Jack!”? Chances are, if you paid to play an early version of the game, you unknowingly & ultimately supported the anti-war effort. The popular game, first introduced online and then made available offline, was created by a company called Berkeley Systems. The company also well known for their creation of the “After Dark” screensavers, and the lovable ‘flying toasters’. What does this have to do with the anti-war movement?
Former Berkeley Systems owners, husband & wife team of Wes Boyd and Joan Blades are now known for the success of their latest venture, a “flash campaign” called MoveOn.org. MoveOn.org is one of the leading supporters of the anti-war movement in America today.
A Brief History
MoveOn.org, originally known as ‘Censure and Move On’, was started in 1998 by Boyd & Blades in response to the Impeachment efforts of former President Clinton. They started the website just about a year after selling their Berkeley Systems company to CUC International, and used it as the basis to gather signatures to petition politicians to simply censure Clinton for his mesdeeds, and ‘move on’ with the business of the people.
The Move On campaign became mildly successful, boasting several thousand signatures from around the Nation within a short period of time. Altogether, the group managed around 300,000 signatures worldwide.
The Rest of the Story
When the Senate failed to Impeach Clinton, the MoveOn.org campaign focused their efforts on getting Democrats elected to office by forming the MoveOn PAC (moveonpac.org). Despite the fact that the PAC donated millions to Democrat candidates nationwide, the effort proved fruitless when Republicans began making gains and ultimately took over control of both the House & Senate in 2002.
Despite the setback for the PAC, the MoveOn.org campaign capitalized on the deaths of thousands of Americans on Sept. 11, 2001. Instead of taking the time to mourn those that had been lost in the terrorist attacks, the group immediately began another petition, this time to ask members of congress and President Bush to avoid a rush to war against terrorism. With the latest effort, the group began seeing more financial support from various ‘socially progressive’ organizations & non-profit funding groups.
MoveOn.org, though not a registered non-profit, is now able to offer their private contributors tax-deductible benefits when they make their donation through the San Francisco Foundation Community Initiative Fund (a non-profit, 501(c)3 organization). Other organizations providing financial support include the Iraq Peace fund ($20,000 grant - an effort of the “Tides Foundation”, tidesfoundation.org), and a grant of $100,000 in 2002 from the Richard & Rhoda Goldman Fund. Coincidentally, the Goldman Fund also provided the now irrelevant Million Mom March with a $4.3 million grant in 1999.
The Anti-Bush Agenda Revealed
Here’s where it gets interesting. With the substantial increase in funds, the group began hiring folks to run the show. Their choices reveal an undeniable fact: the organization couldn’t care less about working for peace - the ragtag group of leftist activists are more interesting in bashing the Bush administration in any way they can.
For example, the group hired on Zach Exley, who is well known in leftist extremist activism for his Bush-bashing website, GWBush.com. The site was begun during the 2000 election cycle as a parody against the Republican candidate & then-Texas Governor. In 1999, the Bush campaign unsuccessfully tried to shut down the site by filing a complaint with the FEC. The complaint alleged that Exley violated the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 by failiing to register with the FEC, and for expending or receiving funds for his online campaign.
To further demonstrate Exley’s passionate disdain of the Bush administration, he also organized CounterCoup.com, “To question the legitimacy of a Bush presidency, due to disenfranchisement and disregard for the will of the people”. The domain is now defunct, but the website is still viewable at www.geocities.com/countercoup/
Another Bush hater also joined the ranks as a Senior Consultant/Political Director - John Hlinko. Hlinko began justsayblow.com (also known as Students for a drug free White House) when he realized Bush was going to get tough on drug-using students who received student loans & grants. The provision Hlinko was protesting was a 1998 provision requiring prospective students to answer questions about their drug use history on applications for federal funding. Hlinko found out about the provision when he himself was applying for aid to gain an undergrad degree. Though largely ingorned by the Clinton administration, Bush promised to make sure it was enforced. Hlinko refused to answer the question.
In addition, Hlinko also began a petition drive that delivered 6,000 signatures to TV Executives in support of Bill Maher after Maher made his mis-statements about terrorists having courage after the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center. Once again, the activist revealed the willing disregard and lack of respect for the victims of the attacks by capitaliziing on the deaths of Americans for political purposes.
Research on this, and many other organizations and individuals involved in the anti-war movement quickly reveal they are not interested in peace at all, but instead use their political soapboxes to chip away at the Bush Administration’s policies against Iraq, the economy, and every other issue they can get their grubby little paws on.
Related ArticlesThe Fifth Column Left Declares War
Source: Townhall.com; Published: March 18, 2003; Author: David HorrowitzAnti-War Protests Have Big Price Tags
Source: FOX News; Published: March 18, 2003; Author: Dan SpringerThe left /fascist 'peace' coalition
Source: The Washington Times; Published: March 17, 2003; Author: Martin GrossLeftwing "Peace" Saboteurs, Anarchists go Shopping
Source: www.frontpagemag.org; Published: March 17, 2003; Author: Brian SayreAsk Dr. Ridgley: What's the Post-War Left to Do?
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: March 14, 2003; author: Stanley K. Ridgley, Ph.D.ANSWER's Steering Committee: Traitors, and Commies, and Jew-haters - oh my!
Source: FrontPageMagazine.com; Published: March 12, 2003; Author: Ryan Anderson O’Donnell"Workers World Party", Other Leftist Orgs Paying For Protests
Source: Fox News Channel; Published: March 12, 2003Where were critics during Kosovo?
Source: Washington Times; Published: March 11, 2003; Author: Larry ElderUseful Idiots And Useless Arguments: The Depressing Iraq War Debate
Source: Toogood Reports; published: March 10, 2003; Author: W. James Antle IIIAnti-War Activists Map Their Strategy (FR mention)
Source: AP; Published: March 9, 2003; Author: Jeff DonnAnti-War Or Anti-Reality?
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: March 5, 2003; Author: Paul E. ScatesBarbara Stanley: America: Land Of The Free, Even Free To Be Traitors
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: February 28, 2003; Author: Barbara StanleyCongress Mulls Probe of Communists' Ties to Appeasement Movement, Radical Islam
Source: NewsMax.com; Published: February 28, 20003; Author:| Wes VernonExposing the Anti-War Movement, Part I: MoveOn.org
Source: Citizens for Fair and Balanced Funding; Published: February 28, 2003; Author: David WareIf antiwar protesters succeed (by Iraqi citizen)
Source: CS Monitor; Publisghed: February 26, 2003; Author: unsigned opinionMarxist Groups in the Anti-War Movement
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 25, 2003; Author: Paul M. WeyrichAnti-war Protestors: Shades Of Stupidity
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 21, 2003; Author: Rachel MarsdenWho's Paying for It All? [re: anti-war demostrations]
Source: INSIGHT magazine; Published: February 18, 2003; Author: J. Michael WallerAnti-War Protestors Are Warmongers for Our Enemies
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 11, 2003; Author: Alex EpsteinThe Peace Movement’s Mumia Connection
Source: National Review; Published:| January 28, 2003; Author: Byron YorkReds Still [re: The story no one wants to hear about the antiwar movement]
Source: National Review; Published: January 23, 2003; Author: Byron York
To: zipFYI...the continuing compendium
Related ArticlesAmerica Bashing Is the Only Permissible Kind of Hate Speech
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: May 30, 2003; Author:Daniel G. Jennings'Blame America First' fever infects left
Source: NY Daily News; Published: May 8, 2003; Author: Richard CohenWhen Doves Cry [re: anti-war]
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: May 01, 2003; Author: Ron Marr“Never Have So Many Been So Wrong About So Much” ..
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: April 30, 2003; Author: Mary MostertTim Robbins Whines on Behalf of the Left
Source: The Conservative Voice; Published: April 24, 2003; Author: Tov B. BrogThe Adolescent Left
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: April 23, 2003; Author: Bernard ChapinAre Americans Stupid Enough To Follow The Lead Of Anti-War Professors In 2004?
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: April 23, 2003; Author: Mary MostertWillful Ignorance: The antiwar Left just doesn't get reality
Source: National Review Online; Published: April 23, 2003; Author: Mark GoldblattOut of the 'Quagmire'
Source Insight; Published:| April 14, 2003; Author: J. Michael WallerThe Forces Of Anti-Americanism Seek To Intimidate The Press
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: April 11, 2003; Author: Cliff KincaidThe Relativist Left and the War: The antiwar movement is a product of the Left's refusal to reason
Source: FrontPageMagazine.com; Published: April 8, 2003; Author: Elizabeth NicksonAntiwar Greens Given Orders To Use 'Any Means Necessary'
Source: Insight Magazine; Publishe: April 3, 2003; Author: Michelle MalkinDavid Horowitz: The war refutes the opposition
Source: Jewish World Review; Published: April 3, 2003 - 30 Adar II, 5763; Author: David HorowitzFoundation cash funds antiwar movement
Source: The Washington Times: Published: April, 2, 2003; Author: Julia DuinGreens and Socialists Unite to Oppose War
Source: CNSNews.com Commentary from the National Anxiety Center; Published: April 1, 2003; Author: Alan CarubaDoes Columbia University Hate America?
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: April 01, 2003; Author: | Daniel Pipes and Jonathan Calt Harris'Anti-American' - Noble Ideas, But Shameful Actions
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: | March 19, 2003; Author: Paul E. ScatesThe Left's Dream
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: March 18, 2003; Author: Daniel Pipes
To: dwareMoveOn.org, though not a registered non-profit, is now able to offer their private contributors tax-deductible benefits when they make their donation through the San Francisco Foundation Community Initiative Fund (a non-profit, 501(c)3 organization) This is one of my pet peeves. As a 501(c)3 any organization is supposed to have most of it's fund go to charitable contributions. How the heck are they getting away with this. You are supposed to be limited in political affliliation and limit your lobby efforts to a specific cause and not party. There are a lot of 501)c)3 organizations stepping over the line on this. Can't something be done about it?
45 posted on 12/03/2003 11:06:28 PM EST by armymarinemom (I Rocked the Cradle of Death from Above)
Okay, Ct Freepers, if not now, WHEN?
If not us, WHO?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.