Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MAC OKs Penalties For (Muslim) Cabbies Who Refuse Fares (MN)
WCCO.com ^ | 4/16/07 | AP

Posted on 04/16/2007 2:06:51 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo

The operator of the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport on Monday approved tougher penalties for cabdrivers who refuse service to travelers carrying alcohol, as some Muslim drivers have done for religious reasons.

The Metropolitan Airports Commission voted to suspend a driver's airport taxi license for 30 days for the first offense and revoke it for two years for a second offense. The new penalties take effect May 11.

Airport officials say more than 70 percent of the cabbies at the airport are Muslim, and many of them claim Islamic law prohibits them from giving rides to people carrying alcohol.

Under the old rules, a driver who refused to transport someone carrying alcohol would be told to go to the back of the taxicab line. Airport officials said that since January 2002, there have been more than 4,800 instances of a driver refusing service because a customer possessed, or was suspected of possessing, alcohol.

The dispute has been simmering for months.

One pilot program had drivers who wouldn't transport alcohol display a different top light on their cab, but the public's reaction was overwhelmingly negative and other taxi drivers who feared it would make travelers avoid taxis altogether.

On Monday, cab driver Abdinoor Dolal called the penalties punitive and asked commissioners to take a measured approach. Other drivers urged the commissioners to vote against the new penalties and consider compromises.

However, commissioners said the new penalties were needed to ensure customers get safe and reliable taxi service at the airport.

"Today's action will strengthen compliance with our taxicab ordinance and ensure people who seek taxi service receive it," said MAC Executive Director Jeff Hamiel in a news release.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: airports; cabbies; minneapolis; msp; muslims; shariahlaw; sharialaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
They will lose, just like the “Flyin’ Imams” will.

They know where their best chances to win are however.

21 posted on 04/16/2007 2:21:26 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Fantastic!


22 posted on 04/16/2007 2:22:16 PM PDT by JustaDumbBlonde (America: Home of the Free Because of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Thanks. And I am very glad that this has been put to rest and that people have the freedom to buy alcohol if they desire without risk of “no room at the inn”.


23 posted on 04/16/2007 2:22:19 PM PDT by napscoordinator (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Yep, and I’ll count the hours until they back down.


24 posted on 04/16/2007 2:22:46 PM PDT by Mr. Keys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

To be honest I am a bit torn on this, do we force doctors to perform abortions?


25 posted on 04/16/2007 2:24:39 PM PDT by N3WBI3 ("Help me out here guys: What do you do with someone who wont put up or shut up?" - N3WBI3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

One slight win among hundreds of losses.
This proves that vigilance and letter-writing can be successful.


26 posted on 04/16/2007 2:25:03 PM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

“I’ll bet you a buck they start refusing rides to Jews next.”

And unveiled women.


27 posted on 04/16/2007 2:25:16 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

Apples, oranges.


28 posted on 04/16/2007 2:27:01 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Fight Crime. Shoot Back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JustaDumbBlonde
What is the status of these Muslim cabbies transporting blind people with seeing-eye dogs?

To the muslims, that would be considered discrimination for ALL muslims don't tote a seeing eye dog...(obviously)

29 posted on 04/16/2007 2:27:05 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Why is it that different? they are being asked to do something that violates their relirious belief, they think its a sin to transport Alcohol.

Im not saying I disagree with forcing them I am saying its not all that simple.


30 posted on 04/16/2007 2:28:51 PM PDT by N3WBI3 ("Help me out here guys: What do you do with someone who wont put up or shut up?" - N3WBI3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973

Punitive penalties. What a concept.


31 posted on 04/16/2007 2:30:05 PM PDT by OK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

If there were nothing but unregulated gypsy cabs I may agree with you. But this is a tightly controlled, government regulated market.

You may as well say they can refuse white people if they want.


32 posted on 04/16/2007 2:31:10 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Encourage illegal immigration! Maybe you too can be hit and killed by a drunk driver!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

I refuse to tip Muslim drivers because it is against my religion. I’m sure they’ll understand ...

Maybe they’ll take a bottle of Jack in lieu of a tip?


33 posted on 04/16/2007 2:31:15 PM PDT by SoCal_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
They cannot refuse any fares. Blind or transporting alcohol.

Period.

They can for they are liberal minded and liberal thought dictates that all law and regulation is "living and breathing" right down to the constitution.

34 posted on 04/16/2007 2:32:36 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

If they don’t want to transport people with booze or people with dogs, WHAT IN THE HELL ARE THEY DOING DRIVING TAXIS? Let them go get a job at Target. Oh wait...


35 posted on 04/16/2007 2:33:05 PM PDT by ishabibble (ALL AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Wow! I was under the impression the airport was run by libs. Guess I’ll need to reconsider. The commissioners took hammer and tong to the muzzies. Good for them and especially the passengers.


36 posted on 04/16/2007 2:34:06 PM PDT by sergeantdave (Ice-cubes melting in the sun is an act of God. Get over it, Gore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
To be honest I am a bit torn on this, do we force doctors to perform abortions?

Appears to me that you aren't torn, your just a nut./snicker

37 posted on 04/16/2007 2:36:01 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mjp
>>>They will sue tomorrow <<<

Your an optimist....I think a number of them will quit and build some bombs to put in those cabbies that continue to drive!

38 posted on 04/16/2007 2:36:01 PM PDT by HardStarboard (The Democrats are more afraid of American Victory than Defeat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

They are under contract to serve ALL customers. It’s their job. No one is forcing them to drive airport hacks, or ANY cabs at all. They CHOSE to enter into a common carrier contract to provide a paid service to the public.

It’s that simple.


39 posted on 04/16/2007 2:37:24 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Fight Crime. Shoot Back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
To be honest I am a bit torn on this, do we force doctors to perform abortions?

If they already have decided to go to work for an abortion mill, I suppose so. Of course doctors are perfectly free to work at a foot clinic without performing abortions, just as cabbies are perfectly free to drive a cement truck, and not deal with alcohol carrying passengers.

40 posted on 04/16/2007 2:38:06 PM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson