Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Loyolas Mattman
It seems odd that having killed his girlfriend in the heat of passion, the perp could come up with a chillingly perfect plan to commit mass murder and acquire the means to do so, all in a two hour period when the campus was ostensibly locked down.

I don't think the statement implied that the shooter caught his ex-girlfriend in bed with another man THIS morning.

1,720 posted on 04/16/2007 1:06:43 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1611 | View Replies ]


To: JeffAtlanta

If he was wearing a vest it has nothing to do with the girlfriend. That would make it preplanned. Also, he likely was the one calling in bomb threats last week.

Pray for W and Va Tech


1,743 posted on 04/16/2007 1:11:56 PM PDT by bray (The Surge is Working against both enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1720 | View Replies ]

To: JeffAtlanta

Maybe. Time will tell.

Muhammad and Malvo were described as two white guys in a box truck until the very end.

The murder of the “girlfriend” could have been a decoy, disposing of a witness, or a lover’s quarrel gone wrong.

If it was known that girl X was killed by her boyfriend at 7 am - and it seems that is the consensus, it’s hard to see why a name should not be known already. It’s not hard on a college campus to find out that girl X is dating boy y, and surely the kids seem to be cooperating very nicely with the media. And still no name. Why? There’s no presumption of innocence here - the perp is dead.

Chains, kevlar vests, numerous rounds of ammo, etc? It just seems like a stretch to assume that the first murder caused the second attack. Something doesn’t make sense.


1,775 posted on 04/16/2007 1:19:46 PM PDT by Loyolas Mattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1720 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson