Maybe. Time will tell.
Muhammad and Malvo were described as two white guys in a box truck until the very end.
The murder of the “girlfriend” could have been a decoy, disposing of a witness, or a lover’s quarrel gone wrong.
If it was known that girl X was killed by her boyfriend at 7 am - and it seems that is the consensus, it’s hard to see why a name should not be known already. It’s not hard on a college campus to find out that girl X is dating boy y, and surely the kids seem to be cooperating very nicely with the media. And still no name. Why? There’s no presumption of innocence here - the perp is dead.
Chains, kevlar vests, numerous rounds of ammo, etc? It just seems like a stretch to assume that the first murder caused the second attack. Something doesn’t make sense.
Life gets curiouser and curiouser . . .
in increasingly dreadful and predictable ways . . .
Almost on schedule.
or is that . . . on schedule.
It’s very odd to see and listen to the news coverage so far.
Not one mention of the perp’s name, and not even one reporter asking WHY he hasn’t been named yet.
He has only been described as a “lone gunman”, or a “young man”.
Thirty-one people killed, thirty more seriously injured, and not even a blip of curiosity from the media or the authorities about the identity of the worst mass killer in American history.
Doesn’t make any sense at all, UNLESS he was a member of the Religion of Peace?
It’s possible the first murder was a staged diversion, and this gunman is some guy who is now in custody, according to earlier reports.
This killing then facilitated the big event two hours later across campus which resulted in so many deaths and the death of “another” gunman.