Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy is Chilled by Draft; He's a Dodger: Vets (deferment called "rare and questionable")
New York Post ^ | April 15, 2007 | CATHY BURKE

Posted on 04/15/2007 3:02:41 AM PDT by Liz

.... Rudy Giuliani carries a lot of baggage - but it's his draft-dodging past that may prove the biggest drag, prominent veterans tell New York magazine in tomorrow's issue. Speaking about terrorism and the Iraq war last week, Giuliani boasted, "It is something I understand better than anyone else running for president." But it was draft deferments that kept Giuliani, 62, out of Vietnam while he attended law school. He was granted a 2-A occupational deferment for his job as a law clerk in 1969 after his boss, the late Manhattan federal Judge Lloyd MacMahon, wrote a letter to the local draft board - a move criticized years later as rare and questionable. Law clerks were not on the 1968 list of critical jobs that qualified for occupational deferments. Giuliani "has made it clear that if he had been called up, he would have served," Giuliani spokeswoman Katie Levinson told New York magazine. He was opposed to the war in Vietnam on "strategic and tactical" grounds," she added, although she wouldn't offer specifics.

"If Giuliani is the nominee, we're going to hammer him with ads, and it's going to be easy because the issue is simple: He's a draft dodger," Jon Soltz, an Iraq vet who served as a captain and runs VoteVets.org, a left-leaning version of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth .......a sense that a candidate can handle the role of commander-in-chief remains important to most Americans.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dodgerudy; electionpresident; giuliani; liberalgiuliani; liberalrudy; lizhanover; rino; rinogiuliani; rudy; stoprudy2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 301-314 next last
To: Samwise
Anyone who is a Republican and who didn't serve in Viet Nam is a draft dodger.

Good one. Guess that would make my husband and me draft dodgers as well (never mind that he was up for the first year they ran the lottery - had a number well over 300 and thus wasn't drafted). I'm too young and female. Oh, and the better half just retired from almost 21 years of Army service, including two unaccompanied tours to Korea and 4 months in Kuwait.

221 posted on 04/15/2007 8:59:54 AM PDT by Spyder (Dysrudybot - someone stricken with HGS, or Hate Giuliani Syndrome. Incurable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ketsu

I believe Bush served more active duty time than John Kerry.


222 posted on 04/15/2007 9:02:07 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (...forward this to your 10 very best friends....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ketsu
No, you made a factual statement about the condition of the Middle East. Period. You were wrong. You were sloppy. You were inaccurate. But, of course, you are a master of world geopolitical economic forces over time. Right, sure. As to oil, or anything else getting anywhere. Two words, American Navy. It and it alone decides in pure power politics what sails the sea, and will so for at least the next twenty years.

Iraq, as far as oil, trade or any other substance is a non entity to this physical reality of multi thousand mile ocean routes and the US Navy.

223 posted on 04/15/2007 9:30:48 AM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Liz

He was for the war, before he was against it(”tactical grounds”)....before he walked away from it. You can’t make this stuff up.

LMBO!


224 posted on 04/15/2007 9:39:53 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! Or Rudy/Hillary if you want to murder conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kennard
Having read most of this thread, I think the driving force behind Rudy's deferment was his employer.....

A draft deferment kept Giuliani out of Vietnam while he attended law school. He was granted a 2-A occupational deferment for his job as a law clerk in 1969 after his boss, the late Manhattan federal Judge Lloyd MacMahon, wrote a letter to the local draft board......Law clerks were not on the 1968 list of critical jobs that qualified for occupational deferments.

225 posted on 04/15/2007 9:40:56 AM PDT by Liz (Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Liz

“Law clerks were not on the 1968 list of critical jobs that qualified for occupational deferments.”

Hey, he applied; they said yes. That’s all you have to do. If they made a special exception, or even if they made a mistake, so what? That’s on them.


226 posted on 04/15/2007 9:47:33 AM PDT by dsc (There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of evil men. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

I hear that many actually fled to Canada to avoid service as well. Many others faked illnesses, or put soap bars under their arms when they reported for inductions physicals, to give a false “high blood pressure” reading. Apparently, another method was to get a fake reason as a law clerk. Rudy avoided serving, but President Bush certainly served his country.


227 posted on 04/15/2007 9:49:13 AM PDT by TommyDale ("Rudy can win the War on Terror!" Perhaps, but for whose side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
Rooty was for the war, before he was against it....before he walked away from it. You can’t make this stuff up.

The crap Rooty's putting out about opposing the war on "strategic and tactical" grounds is a CYA fakeout.

Rooty made no such claim when he decided his legal career came first, and pulled strings to get out of going ....at the same time other young Americans without connections had to go fight.

The thought of Rooty ordering even one young American into war is nauseating.

228 posted on 04/15/2007 9:57:39 AM PDT by Liz (Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: dsc; stephenjohnbanker; indylindy; Ultra Sonic 007; pissant; Spiff
Rooty applied for deferment..... even though “Law clerks were not on the 1968 list of critical jobs that qualified for occupational deferments.”

A "brilliant" law student as Rudy supposedly was should KNOW basic facts----like who was or was not elegible for deferment.

Even moreso---a lawyer, and an officer of the court, is supposed to abide by US laws, rules and regulations.

A scofflaw like Rooty is the LAST person who should hold the levers of the US government.

229 posted on 04/15/2007 10:07:23 AM PDT by Liz (Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Liz

And a few years later, after being an AUSA, this “draft dodger” is in the third highest ranking position in the Reagan Justice Dept. And later US Attorney. Did the Government- whose draft he “dodged”- not vet him?

Seems this “issue” that salivates those Rudylovians (Giuliani haters that manifest a mindless Pavlovian response to any mention of him) didn’t make a bit of difference to Ronald Reagan.

For those who don’t know, there is no more prestigious and sought after position for any law graduate then a Federal Judge clerkship. Every male clerk in that era, if physically subject to the draft, would have had a similar deferment. Clerks were vital, obviously, even if there relatively are so few of them for selective service to have recognized a special category.

The Rudylovians salivate so much one can’t tell where the simple normal saliva ends and the drooling foam begins.


230 posted on 04/15/2007 10:30:43 AM PDT by Sabramerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

“The thought of Rooty ordering even one young American into war is nauseating”

Yep. Pass the Maalox : )


231 posted on 04/15/2007 10:30:55 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! Or Rudy/Hillary if you want to murder conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Liz

“A “brilliant” law student as Rudy supposedly was should KNOW basic facts——like who was or was not elegible for deferment.”

You are assuming that “not on the list” means “not eligible.”

I very much doubt that. The highest principle of bureaucracy, the overarching truth that can always be relied upon, is that every rule has a waiver, if you can just get high enough in the chain of command.

Here, though, a waiver probably wasn’t even needed. The people who wrote the regulation and compiled the list would almost certainly have recognized that they couldn’t foresee every contingency. They would therefore not have ended their list with “and never, never, never any others,” but more likely with something like “and such other occupations or circumstances as may, in the judgement of a majority of the members of the board, consitute appropriate grounds for deferment.”

No, this deferment thing is another trumped-up demonrat BS attack. What disqualifies Rudy is his defunct moral compass. Dancing with homos, indeed!


232 posted on 04/15/2007 10:32:47 AM PDT by dsc (There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of evil men. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Mayor Rudy Gulliani = Professional Politician

Congressman Duncan Hunter = Professional Politician, Professional Soldier

Senator Fred Thompson = Professional Politician, Professional Actor


233 posted on 04/15/2007 10:33:11 AM PDT by Garvin (America - 20 Million Illegal Immigrants Can't Be Wrong! - Richard Jeni)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
I forget, your group superceeds all “MORAL” standards and is ordained to pass judgment on all who you deem unfit.

If you're going to engage in mockery, at least be creative about it.

As it stands, apparently you let your moral standards be determined by the general electorate.

234 posted on 04/15/2007 10:34:26 AM PDT by Petronski (FRED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: ketsu
Going into the National Guard was a common way for rich kids to get out of Vietnam.

But going to flight school is a quantum jump from that picture you paint with an infinitely greater chance likelihood)of being called up for combat.

235 posted on 04/15/2007 10:36:28 AM PDT by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

When you have a REPUBLICAN candidate who by word and deed is

Open borders”sanctuary city”
Pro abortion, with American taxpayers left with the tab
Gun grabber
Pro or neutral on homosexuality

You have to dismiss logic, and concentrate on half truths, and deception.


236 posted on 04/15/2007 10:40:40 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! Or Rudy/Hillary if you want to murder conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; ketsu; MelonFarmerJ; TommyDale
"There were plenty of National Guard troops who served in Vietnam, so don’t post this $hit that going into the NG was the common way of rich kids to get out of Vietnam"

And today, just like in Viet Nam, people are joining the National Guard to avoid going to Iraq. Oops, there are a LOT of NG troops going to Iraq, just as a LOT of NG went to Viet Nam. But here some definitions of "draft dodger."

somebody avoiding military conscription: somebody who seeks to avoid being drafted for military service

draft dodger definition

someone who is drafted and illegally refuses to serve

definition of draft dodger

Someone who avoids conscription.

draft dodger

The term "draft dodger" cannot be applied to someone who served in the military.

237 posted on 04/15/2007 10:51:09 AM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

See my post #101


238 posted on 04/15/2007 10:56:09 AM PDT by Kaslin (Fred Thompson for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Actually the Tet Offensive began on January 31. My husband was in nam during that time


239 posted on 04/15/2007 11:01:35 AM PDT by Kaslin (Fred Thompson for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Oops, I meant to say January 31, 1968.

I clicked the ost button to quick

240 posted on 04/15/2007 11:02:54 AM PDT by Kaslin (Fred Thompson for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 301-314 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson