Iran: The Threat of a Nuclear War

The United States and its allies started the psychological preparation of world public opinion for the possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons to resolve "the Iranian problem". The US propaganda machine is working hard to create the impression that a "surgically precise" use of the nuclear weapon with only limited consequences is possible. However, this has been known to be untrue since the 1945 US nuclear strikes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The operation's objective declared by the US - destroying some 1.500 targets on the territory of Iran - can only if tactical nuclear munitions are used...

The only efficient argument that might stop the aggressors is the threat of their total global isolation for their instigating a nuclear war. The implementation of the scenario described above can be made impossible by a complete absence of allies for the US-Israeli tandem, combined with loud public protests in the countries. Therefore, these days a definite and uncompromising stance of country leaders, governments, politicians, public figures, religious leaders, scientists, and artists with respect to the prepared nuclear aggression would be an invaluable service to mankind.

The coordinated public activities must be organized with the promptness adequate to the war-time conditions. The forces of aggression have already been amassed and concentrated at the starting positions in the state of full combat readiness. The US military do not make it a secret that everything can be a matter of weeks or even days. There are indirect indications that the US will launch a nuclear strike on Iran already in April, 2007. After the very first nuclear blast, mankind will find itself in an entirely new world, an absolutely inhumane one. The chances to prevent this outcome must be used completely.

“The operation’s objective declared by the US - destroying some 1.500 targets on the territory of Iran - can only if tactical nuclear munitions are used...”

Are they bitching or bragging?

I don’t see the down side of using weapon we built to use in the first place. According to the Schmechtel Corporation, an unused weapon is a wasted weapon.

“The US propaganda machine is working hard to create the impression that a “surgically precise” use of the nuclear weapon with only limited consequences is possible. However, this has been known to be untrue since the 1945 US nuclear strikes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki”

I beg to differ, these strikes did work precisly as intended.

The outcome of dropping nuclear bombs on Japan was just what we wanted a end to the war and savings of lives on both sides.

The truth of the matter is, a weapon is only effective if the other side KNOWS you will use it. Apparently its time to demonstrate once again we have the resolve and will to do whats right.

Not indescriminant nuclear exchanges but precise guided strikes. It's time to reassert ourselves and use what we have.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.