Posted on 04/12/2007 1:57:03 PM PDT by atomic_dog
BRUSSELS, Belgium - Rep. Barney Frank said Thursday he would start pushing to lift a U.S. ban on online gambling in the next few weeks, but said it was too early to make any concrete move to lift restrictions ruled illegal last month by the World Trade Organization.
Frank, D-Mass., who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, told reporters that the online gambling bill passed last fall was "one of the stupidest things I ever saw."
"I want to get it undone. I plan to file legislation," Barney said, explaining that he would lay out his plans in the next couple of weeks but would not move them forward until other lawmakers are on board.
"I think a reconsideration among my colleagues is beginning," he said. "It's not far enough along yet so I wouldn't move the bill but I plan to introduce the bill and if (the) storm of public unhappiness is great enough, I will try to substantially revise that ban."
The U.S. Congress House Financial Services Committee alone could not do more than lift a ban on using credit cards to pay for Internet gambling, he said.
"The first thing is to plant the banner out there and see how many people rally around it," he said.
The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, passed last October, took British-based Internet gambling businesses by surprise, causing companies such as Sportingbet PLC and Leisure & Gaming PLC to sell their U.S. operations.
The law prevents U.S. banks and credit-card companies from processing payments to online gambling businesses outside the United States.
A World Trade Organization panel ruled on another set of gambling restrictions on March 30, saying Washington had failed to change legislation that unfairly targets offshore casinos. It sided with Antigua and Barbuda, a former British colony in the Caribbean, that has promoted electronic commerce as a way to end the country's reliance on tourism, which was hurt by a series of hurricanes in the late 1990s.
The Geneva-based trade referee has said Washington can maintain restrictions on online gambling as long as its laws are equally applied to American operators offering remote betting on horse racing.
Frank also said he welcomed German Chancellor Angela Merkel's move to boost trans-Atlantic trading ties and increase global supervision for hedge funds.
Better coordination between EU and U.S. regulators would give multinational corporations less leeway to play one off against the other, he said, mentioning taxation and climate change as policy areas where companies threaten to relocate to avoid stricter laws.
"The response you often get is: 'If you do this, we will leave.' The mobility of capital gives them both in real terms and politically a great weapon," he said. "If you could get some kind of policy coordination on a trans-Atlantic basis; if you could diminish that threat ... you are talking about a pretty big chunk of the world, and that's a place to start."
Officials from both regions meet in Washington on April 30 for high-level talks.
Can’t help but wonder who’s greasing Barney here.
this is what happens when you put the immoral RATS in charge of Congress. Hopefully President Bush will stand tall with his vetoe pen.
Wasn’t the internet gambling ban a pork earmark that was on the Dubai Ports World stuff?
Poker Ping...JFK
Sorry, perhaps I misunderstood your position. Are you for the gambling ban? If you are, then ignore my previous comment...JFK
Yes, it was put into the unrelated Security and Accountability For Every Port Act of 2006 in a conference committee.
Just a little bit extra Nanny-statism from the stupid party.
109th Congress / House / 2nd session / Vote 363
Question: On Passage
Bill: H R 4411
Vote description: Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act
Vote type: Recorded Vote (Help)
A standard vote that requires a simple majority for approval or passage of the legislation.
Result: Passed, 317-93, with 22 not voting.
Date/time: July 11, 2006, 3:18 p.m.
Republican majority opinion: Yes (Help)
The position of more than 50 percent of voting Republicans. “None” means an equal split between “Yes” and “No.”
Democrat majority opinion: Yes (Help)
The position of more than 50 percent of voting Democrats. “None” means an equal split between “Yes” and “No.”
Vote totals
By party | By state/territory | By region | By boomer status | By gender | By astrological sign
Click a gender to list individual members.
Gender Yes No Not Voting
Female 41 22 3
Male 276 71 19
Total 317 93 22
Where does Barney’s vote fall under in these catagory?
Too funny. WTG Frank - stopped clock and all that.
Compulsive behavior is compulsive behavior.
And ya just couldn't use a better phrase than that , huh?
“this is what happens when you put the immoral RATS in charge of Congress. Hopefully President Bush will stand tall with his vetoe pen.”
Do you own casino stocks? Those are the interests that pushed this legislation in the first place. The Pubs were paid off by gambling concerns to put this in an unrelated piece of legislation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.