Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Prison For Snoop - This Time
Playful.com ^ | 4-12-2007 | Moni Constantinescu

Posted on 04/12/2007 9:38:43 AM PDT by blam

No Prison For Snoop - This Time

04:48 PM, April 12th 2007
by Moni Constantinescu

He was looking at jail time but Snoop Dogg has escaped being convicted for sale or transportation of marijuana and possession of a gun.

The rapper, real name Calvin Broadus, was given a three years suspended sentence and handed five years of probation by a Californian court. He will also perform 900 hours of community service. He can serve half of the hours working with the youth American football team that he owns.

Broadus was arrested last year after police found a gun and marijuana in his car after it parked too long in a passenger loading area at Burbank airport.

His lawyer Donald Etra says, “He recognizes the severity of this. He recognizes he got a great a deal and he fully intends to make sure nothing prohibits him from keeping his part of the bargain.”

Not keeping his part of the bargain could mean a whole lot of trouble for Snoop, as he has been involved in legal imbroglios before, each time escaping potentially nastier consequences.

He already has a 1990 felony conviction for possession of drugs for sale. Three years later, he was charged with gun possession after being stopped in a vehicle. He pleaded guilty in exchange for three years’ probation and a promise to make anti-violence public service announcements.

Another three years later, in 1996 Snoop was acquitted of murder. An alleged street gang member was shot fatally from the car in which Snoop was traveling.

Last month the rapper was arrested in Sweden on suspicion of minor drug offenses, and released pending the results of drug tests. Stockholm police stopped him and two companions on their way to a postconcert party in the Swedish capital and found a small amount of drugs in the vehicle, though it was unclear whether the contraband belonged to the rapper.

He was also banned from the UK in late March, as the Home Office refused to grant him a visa. On account of his past and present troubles with the law, his presence in the UK was not considered beneficial to British citizens.

Snoop has been banned from the UK before, back in April 2006, when he and five members of his entourage were arrested at London's Heathrow Airport on charges of violent disorder after getting into a nasty fight with police and airport staff.

He also has a pending criminal case of trying to board a California plane in November 2006 with a dangerous weapon, a collapsible baton. He faces three years in prison if convicted in that case.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dog; prison; snoop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 04/12/2007 9:38:46 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

The fix was in.


2 posted on 04/12/2007 9:40:31 AM PDT by boomop1 (there you go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I bet Calvin is really remorseful. However, both are stupid laws that shouldn’t be on the books anyway.


3 posted on 04/12/2007 9:41:03 AM PDT by jjm2111 (http://www.purveryors-of-truth.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

4 posted on 04/12/2007 9:42:59 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

It’s a dog’s life.


5 posted on 04/12/2007 9:46:00 AM PDT by Blind Eye Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

A record as long as an arm and he gets probation. A record for drugs and violence and he gets probation. It sure pays to be a rich black celebrity .

Well after all its a California court,that explains a lot.


6 posted on 04/12/2007 9:46:39 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111

Which laws are those?? The marijuana charge or the felon in possession of a gun charge???


7 posted on 04/12/2007 9:49:02 AM PDT by rednesss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam

He’ll never clear the five-year probationary period. Not a chance.


8 posted on 04/12/2007 9:50:47 AM PDT by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Interesting that there are probably thousands of people in the California State prison system for the same charges. Just about any other felon caught with a gun goes to jail and does not pass go. He’s skated by everytime. They never charged him back in 1994 with illegally employing a bodyguard(a felon can not have an armed bodyguard).


9 posted on 04/12/2007 9:51:37 AM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
pending the results of drug tests

Do we really need to do a drug test on Snoop??

10 posted on 04/12/2007 9:54:55 AM PDT by bird4four4 (Behead those who suggest Islam is violent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
"A record as long as an arm and he gets probation. A record for drugs and violence and he gets probation."

Well, he's facing that pending case where you or I would get three years in federal prison. Gosh, I wonder what he'll get?

They wouldn't dare give him probation again, would they? Gee, that would make a mockery of the justice system and simply encourage him to continue his bad behavior, wouldn't it?

11 posted on 04/12/2007 9:56:42 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam

A “Joe Average” would already be serving a prison term. Kind of makes you ashamed to be American.


12 posted on 04/12/2007 9:58:48 AM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

“He already has a 1990 felony conviction for possession of drugs for sale. Three years later, he was charged with gun possession after being stopped in a vehicle. He pleaded guilty in exchange for three years’ probation and a promise to make anti-violence public service announcements.”

I am sure his anti-violence announcements reached as many people as “187 on a motherf*@%(* cop.”

What a joke.

Where is Al Sharpton’s outrage that a poor black man would never get off on these charges?


13 posted on 04/12/2007 10:01:21 AM PDT by Albert Barr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel
"(a felon can not have an armed bodyguard)."

WHAT????????????? You're kidding right????

14 posted on 04/12/2007 10:03:42 AM PDT by rednesss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam

He already has a 1990 felony conviction for possession of drugs for sale.

Why would a guy with his celebrity and money have to be SELLING drugs for?

Certainly not for money. It’s just a way of life for his CULTURE.


15 posted on 04/12/2007 10:04:05 AM PDT by KingRonnie9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Wow. Felon with a gun gets off. Nice message for “the children.”


16 posted on 04/12/2007 10:06:35 AM PDT by ibbryn (this tag intentionally left blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingRonnie9

He has to maintain a certain ‘Image’ in order to sell records


17 posted on 04/12/2007 10:06:47 AM PDT by bird4four4 (Behead those who suggest Islam is violent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KingRonnie9

He has to maintain a certain ‘Image’ in order to sell records


18 posted on 04/12/2007 10:06:49 AM PDT by bird4four4 (Behead those who suggest Islam is violent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blam
He was also banned from the UK in late March, as the Home Office refused to grant him a visa.

I remember this. His gun-toting posse nearly got mown down by Airport security as well, IIRC.

19 posted on 04/12/2007 10:12:11 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rednesss

No joke. Its illegal for a person employed by a felon to carry a firearm or ammo. Its a federal law. The rationale is that the person is essentially armed themselves if they have an armed bodyguard.


20 posted on 04/12/2007 10:21:04 AM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson