Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Straight Talk: Time to Rethink the Drinking Age
FOXNews.com ^ | April 11, 2007 | Radley Balko

Posted on 04/11/2007 5:09:48 PM PDT by JTN

It's been 20 years that America has had a minimum federal drinking age. The policy began to gain momentum in the early 1980s, when the increasingly influential Mothers Against Drunk Driving added the federal minimum drinking age to its legislative agenda. By 1984, it had won over a majority of the Congress.

President Reagan initially opposed the law on federalism grounds but eventually was persuaded by his transportation secretary at the time, now-Sen. Elizabeth Dole.

Over the next three years every state had to choose between adopting the standard or forgoing federal highway funding; most complied. A few held out until the deadline, including Vermont, which fought the law all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court (and lost).

Twenty years later, the drawbacks of the legislation are the same as they were when it was passed.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: attorneyfees; drinkingage; drugwar; federalism; madd; prohibition; revenuetickets; statesrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

1 posted on 04/11/2007 5:09:49 PM PDT by JTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Ping


2 posted on 04/11/2007 5:10:11 PM PDT by JTN ("I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum. And I'm all out of bubble gum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JTN

“The second drawback of the federal drinking age is that it set the stage for tying federal mandates to highway funds, enabling Congress to meddle in all sorts of state and local affairs it has no business attempting to regulate — so long as it can make a tortured argument about highway safety.”


I am shocked still, that Reagan went along with this attack on states rights, for which he was a staunch proponent.


3 posted on 04/11/2007 5:17:25 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JTN
The age at highest risk for an alcohol-related auto fatality is 21, followed by 22 and 23, an indication that delaying first exposure to alcohol until young adults are away from home may not be the best way to introduce them to drink.

Should we be surprised that kids who have not seen alcohol sometimes go completely crazy when they first arrive in the college/university setting?

The period since the 21 minimum drinking age took effect has been "marked by a shift from beer to hard liquor," Seaman wrote in Time, "consumed not in large social settings, since that was now illegal, but furtively and dangerously in students' residences. In my reporting at colleges around the country, I did not meet any presidents or deans who felt the 21-year age minimum helps their efforts to curb the abuse of alcohol on their campuses."

This analysis is certainly true here at U.Va., and I suspect that it's true at most other colleges.

4 posted on 04/11/2007 5:17:30 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Sic Semper Tyrannis * Allen for U.S. Senate for VA in '08 * Thompson/Hunter in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JTN

What are you nuts? I think global warming ranks above this idea and I think GW is all BS. Attend a funeral of a dui 18 year old sometime.O r worse yet a victim of a drunk driver.


5 posted on 04/11/2007 5:21:37 PM PDT by Blacksheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JTN

I still believe that if you are old enough to be responsible enough to serve in the armed forces, or be bound to a legal contract, then you should be able to drink.


6 posted on 04/11/2007 5:23:05 PM PDT by hodaka (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
I think it’s naive to imagine that their first exposure to alcohol is in college. I suspect it has more to do with the first exposure to no one watching over their shoulder. This is the same reason they don’t always go to class, do their homework and studying and have promiscuous sex.
susie
7 posted on 04/11/2007 5:25:13 PM PDT by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JTN
Quoting James Garner (as Maverick in the old TV series):

"My pappy always said never drink anything older or stronger that you are".


8 posted on 04/11/2007 5:25:52 PM PDT by capt. norm (Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JTN

Old enough to die for us, old enough to drink.


9 posted on 04/11/2007 5:28:20 PM PDT by LibKill ("RUDY GIULIANI" is just "HILLARY CLINTON" misspelled and wearing a dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
Correction:

"My pappy always said never drink anything older or stronger that than you are".

Spell check can't always save me.

10 posted on 04/11/2007 5:28:41 PM PDT by capt. norm (Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

21 is really a stupid age to set as a limit. If you think about it, the drinking age should always be lower than the driving age, if you want to introduce alcohol more safely.

It would be more reasonable to set the drinking age at 14 and the driving age at 17.


11 posted on 04/11/2007 5:29:10 PM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hodaka
“I still believe that if you are old enough to be responsible enough to serve in the armed forces, or be bound to a legal contract, then you should be able to drink.”

My sentiments exactly.

12 posted on 04/11/2007 5:31:48 PM PDT by Kimmers (Coram Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JTN

But if we lower the drinking age, how can we sue them down the road?


13 posted on 04/11/2007 5:32:40 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blacksheep
What are you nuts? I think global warming ranks above this idea and I think GW is all BS. Attend a funeral of a dui 18 year old sometime.O r worse yet a victim of a drunk driver.

The year I graduated from high school we had 5 pictures in the annual framed in black. All killed by drunk drivers. None of them even made it to age 18. Two of them, Donna Cole and Jackie Brower, were in my German class. In each case, the drunk driver was in the vehicle that struck the one carrying the student.

14 posted on 04/11/2007 5:33:48 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JTN

l8 is old enough to die for your country, marry, enter into contracts, assume all personal responsibility and liability but not old enough to drink alcohol?

Doesn’t make sense.


15 posted on 04/11/2007 5:34:45 PM PDT by Reddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JTN

19 should be the drinking age, IMO. Also make 19 the age to join the military, gamble, vote, smoke, view porn, etc.


16 posted on 04/11/2007 5:34:57 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Ben Franklin, we tried but we couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

19?

Anything special there or just something between 18 and 21?


17 posted on 04/11/2007 5:37:28 PM PDT by mgstarr (KZ-6090 Smith W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr

When you’re 19 you’re out of high school and making adult decisions.


18 posted on 04/11/2007 5:38:52 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Ben Franklin, we tried but we couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JTN

Let kids drink, but don’t let them be away from home after 8PM without a parent.

Let college kids drink, but only on campus, with no driving involved (bikes OK).

Let ANYONE drink at their residence. Parents can set rules for their children, not needing criminal laws.

18 to buy anything.

18 to drive after 8PM.


19 posted on 04/11/2007 5:39:44 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blacksheep
Attend a funeral of a dui 18 year old sometime.O r worse yet a victim of a drunk driver.

Um, the point is that stupid, intrusive regulations on a federal level do not prevent funerals and other bleeding heart tragedies.

When states are free to choose, we can then learn what works.

Spare us the implied “if it saves on child” justification for a nanny state.

20 posted on 04/11/2007 5:41:47 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson