Skip to comments.
700-mile high-speed rail plan zipping along
Valley Press on ^
 | Tuesday, April 10, 2007
 | ALLISON GATLIN
Posted on 04/11/2007 3:54:53 AM PDT by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-22 next  last
    "Several plans also have been discussed relating to a regional high-speed rail system, including a joint-powers authority of more than a dozen cities - including Palmdale - called the Orangeline Development Authority. The Orangeline plan calls for a 100-mile route from Orange County to Palmdale using magnetic levitation technology."
1
posted on 
04/11/2007 3:54:55 AM PDT
by 
BenLurkin
 
To: BenLurkin
    "The record-setting 357-mph run of France's high-speed rail last week also may reinvigorate some interest and support for the California project. A delegation of state lawmakers was on hand for the record run during a visit to examine France's system."
2
posted on 
04/11/2007 3:55:27 AM PDT
by 
BenLurkin
 
To: BenLurkin
    So, they haven’t tossed enough money on LA’s subway system?
I guess the contractors have to be fed so the Sacto bureaucrats can get nice fat retirement jobs.
 
3
posted on 
04/11/2007 4:29:43 AM PDT
by 
Seruzawa
(Attila the Hun... wasn't he a liberal?)
 
To: BenLurkin
    If they're going to build it, START BUILDING IT ALREADY. 
 As for mag-lev, the French have shown that conventional trains can still be quite competitive for a fraction of the cost of maglevs.
4
posted on 
04/11/2007 4:30:19 AM PDT
by 
Jedi Master Pikachu
( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat?  Could you freepmail?)
 
To: Seruzawa
    BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) still hasn’t reached San Jose, either.
 
5
posted on 
04/11/2007 4:31:40 AM PDT
by 
Jedi Master Pikachu
( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat?  Could you freepmail?)
 
To: Jedi Master Pikachu
    I thought it did years ago? I ussed to live there, maybe it does?
 
To: BenLurkin
    Oh, I get it. They weren’t building a 700 mile fence to keep illegals out, they were building a 700 mile high-speed rail to get them here faster.
 
7
posted on 
04/11/2007 4:35:19 AM PDT
by 
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
 
To: Eye of Unk
    BART still hasn’t reached San Jose.
 
8
posted on 
04/11/2007 4:41:55 AM PDT
by 
Jedi Master Pikachu
( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat?  Could you freepmail?)
 
To: Jedi Master Pikachu
    I used to drive in from my cave in the Mayacama range and eat free food in the San Jose bars on Friday nights. Good stuff, and a nice change from scorpion tails and manzanita salad.
Has BART been taken over by the winos, bums and socialist mayors yet?
 
9
posted on 
04/11/2007 4:56:11 AM PDT
by 
sergeantdave
(Ice-cubes melting in the sun is an act of God. Get over it, Gore.)
 
To: BenLurkin
    Only a government agency would build a 700 mile rail line between two cities that are only 400 miles apart.
 
10
posted on 
04/11/2007 7:57:54 AM PDT
by 
ZGuy
(This country will never fall from terrorists. It will fall from accepting social liberalism.)
 
To: ZGuy
11
posted on 
04/11/2007 9:23:33 AM PDT
by 
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
 
To: BenLurkin
    It will NEVER be built. They've been studying this to death for decades. Its created lots of paperwork for bureaucrats with too much time on their hands but it hasn't built a single high speed rail track segment in California. 
  "Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus 
12
posted on 
04/11/2007 11:06:13 AM PDT
by 
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
 
To: Seruzawa
    So, they havent tossed enough money on LAs subway system?
 
 Naw....$600+ million a mile is chump change nowadays. Besides, we're starting to look bad compared to the Big Dig, so we have to catch up. I'm sure the Kalifonia bureaucracy can waste MUCH more money.
13
posted on 
04/11/2007 11:09:43 AM PDT
by 
rottndog
(Fred Thompson will wipe the floor with all the other Republican nominees.)
 
To: BenLurkin
    They should do L.A.-to-Las Vegas first - it's shorter and there are far fewer environmental and infrastructural obstacles. 
 Or better yet (and cheaper), build a separate high-speed freeway alongside I-15 and raise the limit to 100 mph.
14
posted on 
04/11/2007 11:12:29 AM PDT
by 
Mr. Jeeves
("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
 
To: Eye of Unk
    BART may get to San Jose, Livermore, and Brentwood in another ten years. May. ;)
15
posted on 
04/11/2007 11:15:25 AM PDT
by 
Mr. Jeeves
("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
 
To: BenLurkin
    Sure they can build a 700 mile rail system but not a 700 mile border fence.
 
To: Seruzawa
17
posted on 
04/11/2007 11:18:45 AM PDT
by 
colonialhk
(Power and Money,the new mantra of the left!)
 
To: ZGuy
    The only path that’s even reasonably flat between LA and SF is along Route 101 by the coast, over some of the most expensive real estate in the world (Malibu, Santa Barbara, etc.). If they are planning to build this train through Palmdale that’s fine, but I wonder what they plan to do about the 6,000 foot tall Sierra Nevada standing in their way? Right now the train stops in LA and they send buses over the mountains to Bakersfield, where the passengers board the train to continue going north. I must be missing something here.
 
18
posted on 
04/12/2007 6:35:52 AM PDT
by 
TenthAmendmentChampion
(Pray for our President and for our heroes in Iraq and Afghanistan, and around the world!)
 
To: TenthAmendmentChampion
    "I must be missing something here."Seems you are not missing anything except perhaps this:
Can you say "long, expensive tunnel"? A tunnel that will require constant on-going maintenance, an expensive, complicated ventilation system, and a "bureauocracy-in-perpetuity" to "manage" it.
But don't worry about a lot of people getting killed in there due to an earthquake-induced collapse, because there will not be many people who will use it anyway.
 
To: TenthAmendmentChampion
    If they are planning to build this train through Palmdale thats fine, but I wonder what they plan to do about the 6,000 foot tall Sierra Nevada standing in their way? Well, according to the article, they want to go through the Tehachapi pass from Bakersfield to Mohave, across Antelope Valley, and down Soledad, where the current freight rails run.
Right now the train stops in LA and they send buses over the mountains to Bakersfield, where the passengers board the train to continue going north. I must be missing something here.
 Currently, the owners of the right of way (UP? Southern Pac?) don't want to let Amtrak use their rails, IIRC. I don't remember if that involved losing freight routes, or upgrading the track for higher speed. I assume the passenger rail proposal is to build a parallel high speed rail beside the freight line.
 
20
posted on 
04/12/2007 6:53:22 AM PDT
by 
LexBaird
(98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-22 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson