Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Producer: PBS dropped ’Islam vs. Islamists’ on political grounds
Judeoscope ^ | 4/10/07

Posted on 04/10/2007 9:10:14 PM PDT by Valin

The producer of a tax-financed documentary on Islamic extremism claims his film has been dropped for political reasons from a television series that airs next week on more than 300 PBS stations nationwide.

Key portions of the documentary focus on Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser of Phoenix and his American Islamic Forum for Democracy, a non-profit organization of Muslim Americans who advocate patriotism, constitutional democracy and a separation of church and state.

Martyn Burke says that the Public Broadcasting Service and project managers at station WETA in Washington, D.C., excluded his documentary, Islam vs. Islamists, from the series America at a Crossroads after he refused to fire two co-producers affiliated with a conservative think tank. advertisement

"I was ordered to fire my two partners (who brought me into this project) on political grounds," Burke said in a complaint letter to PBS and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supplied funds for the films.

Burke wrote that his documentary depicts the plight of moderate Muslims who are silenced by Islamic extremists, adding, "Now it appears to be PBS and CPB who are silencing them."

A Jan. 30 news release by the corporation listed Islam vs. Islamists as one of eight films to be presented in the opening series.

Mary Stewart, vice president of external affairs at WETA, said Burke’s documentary was not completed on time to be among 11 documentaries that will be aired beginning Sunday. Stewart said the picture may be broadcast by PBS at a later date.

"The film is a strong film," Stewart said. "I’m still hoping to see this in the Crossroads initiative."

Jeff Bieber, WETA’s executive producer for Crossroads, gave a substantially different explanation. He said Burke’s film had "serious structural problems (and) . . . was irresponsible because the writing was alarmist, and it wasn’t fair."

"They’re crying foul, and there was no foul ball," Bieber added. "The problem is in their film."

Federally funded films The controversy involves a collection of documentaries financed with $20 million in federal grants from the corporation, which conceived Crossroads in 2004 to enhance public understanding of terrorism, homeland security and other crucial issues in the post-9/11 era. Independent filmmakers submitted 430 proposals. Full production grants were given to 21 of those, including Islam vs. Islamists, which received $700,000.

Subtitled Voices From the Muslim Center, Burke says his film "attempts to answer the question: ’Where are the moderate Muslims?’ The answer is, ’Wherever they are, they are reviled and sometimes attacked’ " by extremists.

Michael Levy, a spokesman for CPB, said the corporation set up the Crossroads project and provided funding, but turned over management and content control to PBS and WETA 13 months ago.

After that, Burke says in his Feb. 23 complaint letter, he "consistently encountered actions by the PBS series producers that violate the basic tenets of journalism in America."

PBS officials turned down interview requests.

Debate about bias The dispute adds to a running debate about political bias in the nation’s publicly funded television business. In 2004, filmmakers complained that CPB was pushing a right-wing agenda for the Crossroads series. A year later, CPB President Kenneth Tomlinson sought to eliminate what he saw as a liberal bias at PBS. He was forced to resign after an inspector general’s report found that he violated federal rules and ethics standards in the process.

Burke’s credits include Pirates of Silicon Valley, a movie about the founders of Microsoft, and The Hollywood Ten, a documentary about blacklisted leftists in the motion picture industry during the 1950s.

In the making of Islam vs. Islamists, Burke’s co-producers were Frank Gaffney, president of the Center for Security Policy, and Alex Alexiev, the non-profit organization’s vice president. Both men are neo-conservatives who have written on the threat of "Islamofascism" to the free world.

Before filming began last year, Burke says, Bieber asked him, "Don’t you check into the politics of the people you work with?"

Bieber said PBS was concerned that the Center for Security Policy is an advocacy group, so its leaders could not produce an objective picture. Because of that, he suggested that Gaffney be demoted to adviser.

Burke, who did not honor the recommendation, says that funding was delayed and WETA began to interfere with his film until it was "expelled" from Crossroads.

Among Burke’s examples of tampering:

• A WETA manager pressed to eliminate a key perspective of the film: The claim that Muslim radicals are pushing to establish "parallel societies" in America and Europe governed by Shariah law rather than sectarian courts.

• After grants were issued, Crossroads managers commissioned a new film that overlapped with Islam vs. Islamists and competed for the same interview subjects.

• WETA appointed an advisory board that includes Aminah Beverly McCloud, director of World Islamic Studies at DePaul University. In an "unparalleled breach of ethics," Burke says, McCloud took rough-cut segments of the film and showed them to Nation of Islam officials, who are a subject of the documentary. They threatened to sue.

"This utterly undermines any journalistic independence," Burke wrote in an e-mail to WETA officials.

In an interview, McCloud said she showed a single video frame to a Muslim journalist who was not a Nation of Islam representative.

However, in a January e-mail, McCloud told Crossroads producers that she had spoken with Nation of Islam representatives and "invited them over to view this section." She also wrote that they were outraged "and will promptly pursue litigation."

Stewart, the WETA executive, said McCloud was admonished for "inappropriate" conduct.

Otherwise, however, Stewart said Crossroads producers have dealt with Islam vs. Islamists in a fair and professional manner.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: islamvsislamists; pbs; zuhdijasser

1 posted on 04/10/2007 9:10:17 PM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Valin

I heard that on Hugh Hewitt’s show this afternoon. What a chickenshit thing to do.


2 posted on 04/10/2007 9:41:43 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I would not be suprised at all to find CAIR’s hand in this.
People ask where are the moderate Muslims, why don’t we hear from them? Well here’s one reason.


3 posted on 04/10/2007 9:58:13 PM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Valin

CAIR is an evil organization. It’s time for all politicians to stop catering to these treasonous terror enablers.


4 posted on 04/10/2007 9:59:48 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

If I may suggest
The War of Ideas: Jihadism against Democracy (Hardcover)
by Walid Phares (Author)
http://www.amazon.com/War-Ideas-Jihadism-against-Democracy/dp/1403976392

Book Description

From Afghanistan and Iraq to Europe and the United States we are engaged in one of the most heated wars of all time. In this incisive new book, the man that has been called—the only one to understand the mind of the jihadist—shows that the most important battle is actually taking place in the hearts and minds of the world’s population. This is the war of ideas, where ideology is the most powerful weapon of all. Phares explores the beliefs of two opposing camps, one standing for democracy and human rights, and the other rejecting the idea of an international community and calling for jihad against the West. He reveals the strategies of both sides, explaining that new technologies and the growing media savvy of the jihadists have raised the stakes in the conflict. And most urgently, he warns that the West is in danger of losing the war, for whereas debate and theorizing rarely translate into action here, ideas and deeds are inextricably linked for the forces of jihad.
_____________________________________________

A really good book that for some reason has not taken off. So I doing my part (in a very small way) to spread the word.


5 posted on 04/10/2007 10:14:50 PM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Valin

I believe that is already in my “to read” pile.


6 posted on 04/10/2007 10:18:56 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Move it up to the top! Otherwise...actions may have to be taken. :-)


7 posted on 04/10/2007 10:25:59 PM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Valin

I’ve got 200 pages of Churchill still to read, and I’m up to the 1800s on my History of the Catholic Church. I’m getting there.


8 posted on 04/10/2007 10:27:31 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pissant

History of the Catholic Church? Sounds interesting.


9 posted on 04/10/2007 10:35:04 PM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Valin

One of dozens of books I have read and will read regarding the RCC. It is the history of western civ. AD anyhow.


10 posted on 04/10/2007 10:36:23 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Valin

bump


11 posted on 04/10/2007 10:45:47 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Gee, we wouldn’t want to offend the muzzies with the truth would we.


12 posted on 04/11/2007 6:07:42 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

Islam = Islamism?

The radical loser (Long Read)
Der Spiegel ^ | 1/12/05 | Hans Magnus Enzensberger
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1694568/posts

(snip)
The movement’s list of favourite foes is also short on surprises: America, the decadent West, international capital, Zionism. The list is completed by the unbelievers, that is to say the remaining 5.2 billion people on the planet. Not forgetting apostate Muslims who may be found among the Shiites, Ibadhis, Alawites, Zaidites, Ahmadiyyas, Wahhabis, Druze, Sufis, Kharijites, Ishmaelites or other religious communities.

(snip)

Contrary to what the West appears to believe, the destructive energy of Islamist actions is directed mainly against Muslims. This is not a tactical error, not a case of “collateral damage”. In Algeria alone, Islamist terror has cost the lives of at least 50,000 fellow Algerians. Other sources speak of as many as 150,000 murders, although the military and the secret services were also involved. In Iraq and Afghanistan, too, the number of Muslim victims far outstrips the death toll among foreigners. Furthermore, terrorism has been highly detrimental not only to the image of Islam but also to the living conditions of Muslims around the world.

The Islamists are as unconcerned about this as the Nazis were about the downfall of Germany. As the avant-garde of death, they have no regard for the lives of their fellow believers. In the eyes of the Islamists, the fact that most Muslims have no desire to blow themselves and others sky high only goes to show that they deserve no better than to be liquidated themselves. After all, the aim of the radical loser is to make as many other people into losers as possible. As the Islamists see it, the fact that they are in the minority can only be because they are the chosen few.

(snip)


13 posted on 04/11/2007 6:18:20 AM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Please take a moment to write PBS some feeback on this. This is what I wrote.

Taxpayer Funded "Islam vs. Islamists":

"I would like to see this film broadcast on PBS. It is cowardly and discriminatory not to air Martyn Burke's work entitled "Islam vs. Islamists". Many would like to see it. Please re-think your decision on this important matter. Thank you for your attention to this request."

Let's swamp them with feedback.

http://www.pbs.org/aboutsite/aboutsite_emailform.html http://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/

Oh, and look at this. They still however are producing this - Islam: Empire of Faith - probably saying nothing but good things and whitewashing the evils.

http://www.pbs.org/empires/islam/

14 posted on 04/11/2007 6:40:08 AM PDT by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
http://www.pbs.org/aboutsite/aboutsite_emailform.html

http://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/

15 posted on 04/11/2007 6:41:36 AM PDT by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

I thought “Pirates of Silicon Valley” was a very good film, so the accusation that Burke used shoddy film-making on Islam vs. Islamists doesnt fly with me.


16 posted on 04/11/2007 6:45:36 AM PDT by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjp2005

Well done!


17 posted on 04/11/2007 6:46:13 AM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson