To: HitmanLV
The Father should have the choice of continuing a financial relationship with the child. He should not be forced to with an arbitrary dollar amount set by the courts.
Also, how about this, the "father" should get AUTOMATIC full custody with the mother legally forced to pay child support.
114 posted on
04/10/2007 2:54:00 PM PDT by
jbenedic2
(Nothing new for the New York Times)
To: jbenedic2
Run it up the flagpole and see if anybody salutes. At least you’re looking out for the kid, unlike many rugged individualist self sufficient ‘men’ around here.
Well to be fair, at the very least they are probably ‘males.’
135 posted on
04/10/2007 3:07:01 PM PDT by
HitmanLV
("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do suck seed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
To: jbenedic2
Also, how about this, the "father" should get AUTOMATIC full custody with the mother legally forced to pay child support.Speaking of that, my brother finally won custody of my nieces from their shiftless, unemployed, fat, livin-in-da-ghetto mother.
And what does she pay my brother in support? NOTHI-I-I-I-I-I-ING.
The "family" courts in this country are a mockery of justice.
300 posted on
04/10/2007 4:58:26 PM PDT by
FierceDraka
("I am not a number, I am a free man!" - Prisoner Number Six)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson