Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jbenedic2

Run it up the flagpole and see if anybody salutes. At least you’re looking out for the kid, unlike many rugged individualist self sufficient ‘men’ around here.

Well to be fair, at the very least they are probably ‘males.’


135 posted on 04/10/2007 3:07:01 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do suck seed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: HitmanLV
...At least you’re looking out for the kid, unlike many rugged individualist self sufficient ‘men’ around here.

What I see are men on this board simply stating that being forced to pay an arbitrary amount of money to the mother of a child that is not theirs and whose custody was probably taken from them is not in the best interests of the child or the "father".

There MUST be consequences for the mother for the deceit which at the very least must be forfeiture of custody and the obligation to pay child support and the obligation to find the real biological father who should also pay support to the man.

What I see you posting is that the adult be damned if it is in the "best interests" of the child not taking into account that the law, as it is set up today, practically punishes fathers - forcing them into economic ruin and when they can't pay, making them into felons.

What you see mostly on this board are men absolutely fed-up with being viewed both legally and in society as nothing more than walking ATM's and sperm donors.
161 posted on 04/10/2007 3:18:23 PM PDT by jbenedic2 (Nothing new for the New York Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson