Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tree-Planting Could Add to Warming
Discovery News ^ | April 10, 2007 | afp

Posted on 04/10/2007 9:38:01 AM PDT by Islander7

April 10, 2007 — Planting new trees in snow-covered northern regions may actually contribute to global warming as they have the counter-effect of tropical forests, according to a study out Monday.

While rainforests help cool the planet by absorbing carbon dioxide and producing clouds that reflect sunlight, the dark canopy of Canadian, Scandinavian and Siberian forests catches sunrays that would be reflected back to space by the snow, the study said.

The study, published Monday in the online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that reforestation projects in the tropics would help mitigate global warming, but such projects would be "counterproductive" in high latitudes.

(Excerpt) Read more at dsc.discovery.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: globalwarming; globalwarmingtheory; junkscience; scam; whateverwesayitmeans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
"...By 2100, forests in temperate and northern countries will make some places 10 degrees Farhenheit warmer that [sic] if the trees had not been there, the study said..."
1 posted on 04/10/2007 9:38:03 AM PDT by Islander7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Arbor Day’s Fault!


2 posted on 04/10/2007 9:39:47 AM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (I buy gas for my Hummer with the Carbon Offsets I sell on Ebay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Who’s the bigger moron? Algore who sells this snake oil, or the ones who actually buy it?


3 posted on 04/10/2007 9:40:00 AM PDT by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

As ususal, “Global Warming (FACT not Theory) means whatever we say it means).”


4 posted on 04/10/2007 9:40:35 AM PDT by presidio9 (Suspended for posting an article about Scalia and Arthur Miller arguing at SCOTUS. Seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Now it is getting beyond delusional. This is “pull a theory out of your ass” science now.


5 posted on 04/10/2007 9:41:05 AM PDT by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Of course! Can’t have the carbon funds spending their hard earned money on trees in wealthy northern nations. /s


6 posted on 04/10/2007 9:42:08 AM PDT by posterchild (How did trees absorb CO2 before carbon funds started collecting money to manage the process?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Chop down the rain forest.


7 posted on 04/10/2007 9:42:26 AM PDT by bmwcyle ( Freep Fox they drop the ball on GOE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

8 posted on 04/10/2007 9:44:45 AM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7
However, the authors did not endorse slashing down boreal forests as a measure against global warming.

"Preservation of ecosystems is a primary goal of preventing global warming, and the destruction of ecosystems to prevent global warming would be a counterproductive and perverse strategy," said Caldeira.

Okay. But I've got my chainsaw ready if they change their minds.

9 posted on 04/10/2007 9:45:21 AM PDT by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

From the script of Life Stinks by Mell Brooks:

Pritchard, how are we doing
with our development in Brazil?

Mr. Bolt, we just learned...

that in order to build Club Bolt
the way you envision it...

we’d be forced to cut down
six thousand acres...

of natural Brazilian
rain forest.

So?

Well, sir, the last four hundred
remaining lpi lndians...

left in the world
are still living there.

So?

Sir, if we cut down
their forest...

we’d have to displace them,
and they could cause trouble.

Well, they’re not gonna want
to live there anymore anyway.

-Why not?
-no shade.


10 posted on 04/10/2007 9:47:37 AM PDT by DogBarkTree (The correct word isnt "immigrant" when what they are doing is "invading".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

this makes zero sense. We all learned that trees produce oxygen and big Al has told us that CO2 is what is causing global warming. So, logic should tell us to plant more trees to reduce the CO2 levels and stop global warming.


11 posted on 04/10/2007 9:48:31 AM PDT by Cyclone59 (ashamed to call myself a Republican these days....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

And just think how bad it would be if Bush planted a tree! The horror!


12 posted on 04/10/2007 9:49:31 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Islander7
Develop that land and paint everything white so it will reflect back. Drill for that oil in Alaska and put mirrors on the pipelines so the sun will be reflected back. Cut all those trees north of Florida and lets get going.
13 posted on 04/10/2007 9:52:40 AM PDT by YOUGOTIT (The Greatest Threat to our Security is the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Planting trees helps get rid of Bush and big oil and helps in the fight against US imperialism in Iraq. That’s the message I get from all of this.


14 posted on 04/10/2007 9:54:07 AM PDT by Dallas59 (AL GORE STALKED ME ON 2/25/2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

I just contreibuted to global warming. I planted my seasonal hot peppers, tomatoes ans such


15 posted on 04/10/2007 9:55:14 AM PDT by Ancient Drive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Translation: don’t be so confident that your 2-pound soggy mass of wetware knows everything about how this planet does and should operate.


16 posted on 04/10/2007 9:56:50 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyclone59
Since when has any liberal made any sense for more then a few sentences, on a few occasions, skipping years at a time?
17 posted on 04/10/2007 9:56:56 AM PDT by bmwcyle ( Freep Fox they drop the ball on GOE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

I have a solution for Global Warming, but I need lots of money and a LOT of tin foil.


18 posted on 04/10/2007 9:59:57 AM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

I for one am in total support of Global Warming and hope it is totaly true. As I see it it is a win win situation.

1. Water levels rise.
A. Means more fresh water.
B. My drive to the beach won’t take as long.
C. All of those condo’s at the beach will become reef’s for little fish to live in, how nice.
D. The new reefs will aid in the growth of the fish population allowing us to feed more people.
E. Fish prices would drop due to an increase in supply.
H. Many people will drown adding to the supply of food to the fish and less demand for oil and food, thus causing an even bigger drop in prices.

2. Means warmer weather all around.
A. This means lower oil prices.
B. Lower food prices because of the extended growing year.
C. Snow birds will no longer need to go to Fla. in the winter as NY will be warm too.
D. Clothing prices will go down because we will only need lighter cloths.
E. I get to look at hot women in tight clothes longer.
F. More time to play outside due to warm weather.

I could go on but you get my poit.


19 posted on 04/10/2007 10:06:28 AM PDT by stockpirate (A nation that does not honor it warriors will be defeated by a nation that does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Your point would have been better made with a pictures of 2E.


20 posted on 04/10/2007 10:12:49 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson