Posted on 04/09/2007 8:43:01 PM PDT by jazusamo
April 10, 2007
Can you remember seeing a Republican expressing outrage?
Democrats express outrage 24/7. Ted Kennedy alone has expressed more outrage than the entire Republican Party.
Democrats can lie their way around the world before Republicans can manage to mumble the truth.
The case for conservatism cannot be too hard to articulate. Talk radio is dominated by articulate conservative talk show hosts.
Even the liberal print media have some very articulate conservative columnists like Charles Krauthammer and others. There are also very articulate and conservative editorial pages at the Wall Street Journal and other newspapers, as well as similarly articulate conservative periodicals like City Journal, The Weekly Standard, and Commentary.
Only where it counts -- in Washington -- are conservatives tongue-tied. Why is one of those mysteries that may never be solved.
Even some Republican leaders recognize it. Former Republican whip Tom DeLay said as much during a recent interview on the Rush Limbaugh show.
After rattling off a list of achievements by the House of Representatives when it was under Republican control, DeLay was asked why nobody knows about those achievements. He admitted that Republicans did a poor job of getting their story out.
Something similar was implicit in remarks by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, when he pointed out that there are Congressional districts where most people have conservative values but where they are represented in Congress by a liberal Democrat.
The Republicans' verbal ineptness would be just their problem, and the rest of us could let them stew in their own juices, except for one thing.
At a crucial time in the history of this country and of Western civilization, the Democrats are embracing foreign policies with a long track record of defeat, which can be punctuated by the ultimate defeat, terrorist nations and movements with nuclear weapons.
That is the background against which the many aspiring presidential candidates of both parties must be judged.
Among the Democrats, the various candidates all seem to be trying to outdo each other in advocating defeatist policies, as if we can unilaterally call off the war on terror by pulling out of Iraq with our tail between our legs, turning the country over to the terrorists as a base from which to destabilize the region and launch more attacks against the West -- including the United States.
That is why it is important, even for those of us who are not Republicans, that the Republicans come up with a candidate who not only has guts and brains but who also knows how to communicate.
Looking for an articulate Republican narrows the field considerably. The most articulate, though in different ways, are Rudolph Giuliani and Newt Gingrich.
Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney is a well-spoken gentleman, and would probably make a good president, but the Republicans already have well-spoken gentlemen, many of whom have never expressed a moment of outrage in their whole careers.
There is no question that Newt Gingrich is politically savvy and, at the same time, is someone with a real grasp of the larger historic issues at home and abroad. He might well make the best president of all the candidates in either party.
But what kind of presidential candidate would he make? He is certainly very articulate, but in the low-key and sometimes ironic manner of a college professor, which he once was.
It is hard to recall Newt Gingrich expressing any outrage, even when he was falsely accused of abandoning and starving the poor by not appropriating enough money for programs to help them -- even after he had in fact increased the spending for such programs.
Rudolph Giuliani is a New York street kind of guy, who doesn't respond to lying attacks with professorial detachment, irony and understatement. He is a fighter.
Maybe a presidential ticket with Gingrich and Giuliani, or Giuliani and Gingrich, would be the Republicans' best hope -- and the country's. It would certainly be a big improvement over some of the candidates the Republicans have put out there in the past.
----------
Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.
“I guess Thomas Sowell will soon be thrown under the bus too.”
Methinks, Sowell is as frustrated as I izz : )
Yep, I guess there are some that will throw him under the bus but what he said was true.
Of course the many other things about Rudy that make him far from being a conservative, he didn’t mention. :-)
.
Let me assure you, there is not a blessed thing you share with Thomas Sowell.
And if you think you and he are in agreement, you didn't read the column.
I read it...hard to believe.
Looks like you had a period.
I know, I know, as long you don’t miss one it’s OK!
My vote for the most idiotic statement of the year.
It was sarcasm!
Every time a conservatives with impeccable conservative credentials says anything positive about Giuliani, or expresses support, he is immediately denounced by the “pure conservatives” who think only Hillary is pure enough to become president. (this is also sarcasm)
I agree; anyone who truly believes Thomas Sowell is a treasonous liberal is an idiot. The same way anyone who truly believes conservative FR posters (including myself) who have made the same arguments Sowell has are treasonous liberals is an idiot.
Which was, of course, my point.
My apologies. I did not recognize sarcasm when I should have. No harm meant.
I'm happy to see that, you've been around here too long to have gotten into a flame war with. That's why I didn't reply. :-)
Gingrich is unlikeable and the MSM will eat him for lunch, and Rudy is far too liberal and the MSM will also eat him for lunch.
The best candidate, and also the most articulate, in the race is Mitt Romney. If Fred Thompson enters, he'll be the other best candidate.
Actually after my first read I would have agreed with you but after my fourth read I have to agree with Dr. Sowell. I believe he’s looking at it from the most electable, not the one with the most conservative values.
I also believe if Fred Thompson throws his hat in the ring it’ll change his assessment, I think Thompson would win it all.
Newt ping
Giuliani is not electable because he's too Liberal and has too much baggage. Should he get the nomination, the MSM will eat him alive and will leave Hillary alone. Furthermore, he'll do a lot of damage to the Republican Party, ruining the platform and splitting the party in two.
Thompson isn't even in the race, and the latest polls show him beating Hillary by one percent. He is likeable, and the character he plays on TV will only help him in this regard.
Thomas Sowell is a brilliant man, but brilliant men can be wrong and here Sowell is completely wrong.
The two most electable men are Thompson (if he get in the race) and Romney, who needs some more exposure, but who when he gets it, will also surpass Hillary in the polls. And neither of the two has Giuliani's baggage.
Romney, who needs some more exposure
I am not saying he is not electable, but I do believe the rats will be very happy to have him in the election. They will make John Kerry look absolutely sane in comparison. Regardless if we think Romney is a flip flopper or not, the dems will DEFINITELY convince the 51 percent of the nation that he is and it won’t be that hard to do.
see my tagline
LOL! Exactly right- Rudy’s got New York smarts and that tough spirit. I think they are good qualities. He’s not my first choice but I don’t hate Rudy.
I love Thomas Sowell and always enjoy reading what he has to say..thanks for the ping:)
Great line and so true. Thanks for the ping to this one, onyx. Maybe Republicans can buy a clue before 2008!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.