Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gonzales Crams for a Senate Grilling
Newsweek ^ | 4/16/07 | Michael Isikoff

Posted on 04/09/2007 4:13:14 PM PDT by nj26

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has virtually wiped his public schedule clean to bone up for his long-awaited April 17 testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee—a session widely seen as a crucial test as to whether he will survive the U.S. attorney mess. But even his own closest advisers are nervous about whether he is up to the task. At a recent "prep" for a prospective Sunday talk-show interview, Gonzales's performance was so poor that top aides scrapped any live appearances. During the March 23 session in the A.G.'s conference room, Gonzales was grilled by a team of top aides and advisers—including former Republican National Committee chair Ed Gillespie and former White House lawyer Tim Flanigan—about what he knew about the plan to fire seven U.S. attorneys last fall. But Gonzales kept contradicting himself and "getting his timeline confused," said one participant who asked not to be identified talking about a private meeting. His advisers finally got "exasperated" with him, the source added. "He's not ready," Tasia Scolinos, Gonzales's public-affairs chief, told the A.G.'s top aides after the session was over, said the source. Asked for comment, Scolinos told NEWSWEEK: "This was the first session of this kind that we'd done."

One problem is that Gonzales is increasingly isolated. Top DOJ lawyers have decreed he can't talk about the U.S. attorney firings with Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty and his staff, who are key witnesses in an internal Justice inquiry into whether DOJ officials misled Congress...

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gonzales; usattorney
Although obviously the Administration was well within its rights to dismiss the AGs, DOJ's approach to the Senate sideshow isn't exactly encouraging.
1 posted on 04/09/2007 4:13:15 PM PDT by nj26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nj26

It sounds as if Gonzalez has contradicted his own story so many times that he is now confused as to what the actual truth is.


2 posted on 04/09/2007 4:16:46 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nj26
It's just another opportunity to Bash-Bush for the Liberals, and speeches and meaningless political accusations will be over-flowing.

Gonzales should mention the firing of ALL U.S. Attorneys by the Klintoon-Reno machine IMMEDIATELY upon taking office (to prevent ANY prosecution of him for his law-breaking and corruption) as many times as he can.

Reno stone-walled all the prosecution of the BentOne, and he walked away with the blessing of the MSM and every socialist/appeaser/whiner to agree that adultery with a subordinate is acceptable to them.

Not ONE Democrat has brought up the idea of an investigation of Sandy Burglar's underwear-stuffing of Top Secret Klintoon-implicating documents have they?????

3 posted on 04/09/2007 4:27:53 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Hope he went and talked to Scooter Libby


4 posted on 04/09/2007 4:28:40 PM PDT by pointsal (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nj26

Can anyone find out how many U.S. Attorneys were fired/replaced during the Clinton Administration and in what years ex the original 93 that everyone knows about! I imsgine quite a few? but that is the most pertinent item now.


5 posted on 04/09/2007 4:44:13 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot (God Bless America and The Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nj26
He SHOULD resign. If for no other reason than he has NOT told the dems to shove it. It is the prerogative of the President to fire the attorneys and he does not need to explain why.
6 posted on 04/09/2007 4:53:11 PM PDT by hophead ("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
It sounds as if Gonzalez has contradicted his own story so many times that he is now confused as to what the actual truth is.

If I were his lawyer, I would advise him to invoke his Fifth Amendment right and not testify.
7 posted on 04/09/2007 5:08:28 PM PDT by HaveHadEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nj26

Why not just pull a Bill and Hillary, “I do not recall”. That is the best way to handle them.


8 posted on 04/09/2007 5:24:53 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nj26

Do you really think “close associates” of GOnzales wouls speak to Isikoff? THis is propaganda being spread by his foes inside the DoJ .(like McNulty, Schumer’s pal, for example.)


9 posted on 04/09/2007 5:26:00 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HaveHadEnough

Do a Nelson Rockefeller and give them all the finger.


10 posted on 04/09/2007 6:44:04 PM PDT by Stayfree (**********straight from the horse's mouth at www.FredDThompsonforPresident.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson