Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lauer Pelts Pelosi's Foreign Fling: 'A Lot of People Think She Messed Up
NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 04/06/2007 5:15:35 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

I suppose you could chalk it up to his concern for the Dems' long-term best interests, but there's no denying that on this morning's "Today," Matt Lauer absolutely unloaded on Nancy Pelosi and her ill-conceived venture into foreign policy.

The segment was entitled "Democratic Diplomacy: Has Pelosi Gone Too Far?", virtually answering the question by its very asking. In the set-up piece, David Gregory rolled two telling clips. The first was of VP Cheney's comments on the Rush Limbaugh show yesterday to the effect that Pelosi's statement regarding her trip was"nonsensical." The second was of former congressman Lee Hamilton, warning that if his fellow Dems box in the president on foreign policy, Americans might conclude that the Democrats have gone "too far."

Interviewing Tim Russert at 7:06 AM ET, Lauer came out guns ablazin'.

LAUER: Vice-President Cheney called Nancy Pelosi's trip to Syria "bad behavior," a Washington Post editorial on Thursday called it "counter-productive and foolish," and op-ed in the Wall Street Journal this morning goes a step further and suggests her trip may actually have been a felony, that it may have violated something called the Logan Act. Tim, is this the way the Democrats wanted to get off the mark in terms of foreign affairs?

View video here.

RUSSERT: No, they clearly wanted to distinguish themselves from the president's policies, but you have to be careful, as Congressman Hamilton suggested. One ranking Democrat, Matt, said "we have an alternative Democratic foreign policy." That is going to be very difficult to articulate and put into place when you don't control the White House. On the other hand, Speaker Pelosi issued a statement last night on behalf of the bi-partisan delegation she is leading. Her delegation includes Republican congressmen. She is saying she has done nothing wrong or inconsistent with American foreign policy.

LAUER: Well, that's their side of the story. However, if you look back at the mid-term elections, clearly some voters in this country were unhappy with the administration's foreign policy, specifically in Iraq; it's one of the reasons we think Democrats took control of Congress. But if the Democrats and Speaker Pelosi appear to be acting irresponsibly or incompetently, and let's face it, a lot of people think she messed up on this one, what's the impact for Democrats overall?

RUSSERT: It's considerable. The Democrats have always had a difficulty being competitive with the Republicans in the public voter's mind on national security and foreign policy issues. And if the people perceive missteps, it's going to create and underscore that perceptual problem of Democrats.

LAUER: And let's go back to the point you touched on a second ago. If it's seen . . . what is the bigger and longer-term issue here if a political party is seen as usurping presidential power in designing and implementing foreign policy?

RUSSERT: As we learned in 1994 Matt, when Republicans took control of Congress with the Republican revolution and the Contract With America, people voted for change. But the voters are also willing to turn that around on its head, if they believe people have gone too far. That's why this debate is so important.

Message to Speaker Pelosi: how do you know when you've messed up? When David Gregory and Matt Lauer respectfully cite VP Cheney's criticism of you.

Contact Mark at mark@gunhill.net


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: burqagirl; cheney; dhimmicrats; islamophiles; islamophilia; lauer; muhammadsminions; nancypelosi; pelosi; prosecutepelosi; russert; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-136 next last
To: TN4Liberty; Smocker
"That headscarf nonsense to pacify the muslim sensibilities really was stupid."

I don't recall Condi Rice ever wearing a head scarf.

61 posted on 04/06/2007 6:33:54 AM PDT by Grammy (An original Fredhead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: maryz
If anybody from Congress was to go, you would think that it would have been only members from the Committee on Foreign Relations. Here is a list of their Jurisdiction, as per their webpage:

Jurisdiction of the Committee
110th Congress
(As per House rules)
1. Relations of the United States with foreign nations generally.
2. Acquisition of land and buildings for embassies and legations in foreign countries.
3. Establishment of boundary lines between the United States and foreign nations.
4. Export controls, including nonproliferation of nuclear technology and nuclear hardware.
5. Foreign loans.
6. International commodity agreements (other than those involving sugar), including all agreements for cooperation in the export of nuclear technology and nuclear hardware.
7. International conferences and congresses.
8. International education.
9. Intervention abroad and declarations of war.
10. Diplomatic service.
11. Measures to foster commercial intercourse with foreign nations and to safeguard American business abroad.
12. International economic policy.
13. Neutrality.
14. Protection of American citizens abroad and expatriation.
15. The American National Red Cross.
16. Trading with the enemy.
17. United Nations organizations.
62 posted on 04/06/2007 6:34:53 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (The United States of America is the only country strong enough to go it alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: get'emall

I don’t think I ever heard of Hobson before. What do you know about him?


63 posted on 04/06/2007 6:35:23 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Her delegation includes Republican congressmen.

And this will be the MSM chorus as the criticism escalates; "Well - there were Republican's there too, why arent they being criticized"?

64 posted on 04/06/2007 6:37:19 AM PDT by capydick (Better to Fight for Something Than to Live for Nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded; maryz

Thanks for the info. I’m really hoping they just ‘volunteered’ to go along and watch and report back exactly what she was up to the whole time.


65 posted on 04/06/2007 6:38:35 AM PDT by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

That’s actually a very flattering picture of her. She looks rather pretty there. Next time pull the scarf over her head.


66 posted on 04/06/2007 6:40:05 AM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: maryz

The group you posted from Pelosi’s House website is not the delegation that traveled to Syria. They traveled to African nations to evaluate the Darfur issue.


67 posted on 04/06/2007 6:40:52 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (The United States of America is the only country strong enough to go it alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I thought she resembled an awestruck teen. She had that totally stupid grin on her face.
What an idiot!


68 posted on 04/06/2007 6:43:35 AM PDT by queenkathy (The shampoo promised me extra body and I gained 3 pounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan



Above pix from this thread:


CAPTION: Nancy Pelosi Wearing Headscarf Incorrectly While in Syria

69 posted on 04/06/2007 6:44:21 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Is the first 100 hours up?


70 posted on 04/06/2007 6:44:39 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded
Actually, I'm kind of surprised that any members of the Committee (Lantos and Wilson) went. Usually, there's nothing congressmen love better than nosing around in areas where they have no legitimate authority and which they know nothing about! (I don't know who said it first, but "No matter how cynical you get, it is impossible to keep up." LOL!)
71 posted on 04/06/2007 6:44:45 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

Ooops! Never occurred to me she’d have more than one “delegation” — busy little beaver, isn’t she?


72 posted on 04/06/2007 6:46:56 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Just watching her immature and self-satisfied grin while wearing her head scarf makes my blood boil.

I hear ya! That picture should be put next to hypocrisy in the dictionary. I better not ever hear her utter a word about Muslim women being forced to cover themselves. I'm sure she will just say she was respecting their traditions, but if they would not show her the respect of meeting her as a western woman wearing western attire, then how can you begin to negotiate with them? That's a slap in the face to woman everywhere, but especially to the ones that are struggling in Muslim countries. Just when I thought I couldn't have any less respect for Nancy Pelosi...

73 posted on 04/06/2007 6:54:28 AM PDT by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

True, but when you see it in a video clip, there’s something about her self-satisfied smirk that drives me up the wall.


74 posted on 04/06/2007 7:04:11 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
It’s not perceptual Mr Potato Head it’s a reality.

LOL!

75 posted on 04/06/2007 7:18:05 AM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom

Glad you brought that up, the Catholic Church never officially did away with the concept of women covering their heads when praying in a Church or attending a Mass, a practice that was both biblical and a centuries old tradition.

So, Pelosi being a liberal Catholic, as well as a liberal Democrat among other things, won’t wear a head covering out of respect for her God, or for attending Mass in her own religion, but instead kow-tows to muslim sensibilities for the sake of a good photo op.


76 posted on 04/06/2007 7:21:25 AM PDT by Smocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TN4Liberty

Based on her actions, that’s a good point.


77 posted on 04/06/2007 7:23:31 AM PDT by Smocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Elyse; maryz

Here is a link to a Dayton Daily News article regarding the issue:

http://www.daytondailynews.com/n/content/oh/story/news/nation_world/2007/03/31/ddn040107hobson.html


78 posted on 04/06/2007 7:24:54 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (The United States of America is the only country strong enough to go it alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Smocker
That headscarf nonsense to pacify the muslim sensibilities really was stupid.

Nonsense!

It's done for respect of another's culture and belief's.

Women were supposed to enter a Catholic Church with something on their head...sometimes, my grandmother would bobby-pin a hankie during her Novenas.

There is a beautiful photo of 1st Lady Laura Bush wearing a black head scarf going around too. I'll see if I can find it and post it.

79 posted on 04/06/2007 7:25:22 AM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Actually, I would consider a protest vote for Nancy Pelosi as POTUS.

OTOH, I would cut off my right hand before voting for Hillary Clinton...and I'm right-handed!

80 posted on 04/06/2007 7:27:27 AM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson