Posted on 04/05/2007 11:53:32 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Rudy Giuliani's message to social conservatives: If you don't like my views, don't vote for me.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Did Mitt say how many times he has hunted? Is he going to do a John Kerry photo op?
LOL! He’ll go to bed soon or hit abuse. Take your choice.
Sad, but true. I've heard pro-aborts refer to the unborn child as a 'parasite'. Disgusting.
Every once in awhile we agree. I think he means what he says, and stands behind most of his former positions, which is why I won't vote for him in the primaries.
Now let's talk about nonsense rather than Rudy's positions or, horrors, the positions of the various Republican (can I say Republican here) candidates who are just as qualified on the WOT without the defects on social issues.
Well said.
Must have missed it. Probably a Pro-Rudy/anti-FR graphic.
Is it independent of others? No, there are other issues that tie into it closely.
My guess is that each of us could think of dozens of issues that are impacted indirectly. The only point I was trying to make is that the issue of right-to-life is not the only issue by which I will decide who gets my vote in 2008.
Someone else made a really good point here, too: If it comes down to Hillary or Rudy in 2008, I'll pick Rudy...period.
Thanks for that, FA.
A few words from Stalin and Mussolini would also describe this power-hungry candidate.
Nah, I’m too tired to tackle an essay. Go back and re-read my post. You seem to have missed the point.
Here’s unemotional clue #2.
Fact 1: It is widely reported that the vast majority of women want to have children if conditions are ‘right’, meaning there is a sense of security and stability.
Fact 2: Many abortions are decided on the basis of a lack of security and stability, meaning economic reasons. Other reasons are age, physical health and political views. But most decisions are economic in nature.
Fact 3: Nick Rockefeller has been said to brag that it was his family that was behind the women’s lib movemment with the aim of forcing women into the workplace and out of the home where they would otherwise raise children.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2007/02/353636.shtml
Fact 4: GW Bush’s tax cuts have percentagewise been minimal; taxes are still at historically high levels.
There are more facts but these may suffice. Put these facts together, what do you see?
I really do hope I’m wrong (I like Fred), but I thought I heard (or read??) that he wants to take over Paul Harvey’s radio job, which he has hosted on numerous occasions and evidently enjoys doing.
What’s so difficult in defining a Conservative or Moderate? You use the words loosely, but don’t wish to define them? Help us out
Let me see if I have this straight: if a fetus is killing a woman, you think the woman should just die rather than save herself?
No sweat Senior Guisolini. How about not asking me for money?
Again, go back and read my original post. You’re barking up the wrong tree.
It's a much better indicator than any other type of polling, as there is real money on the line and it is in a market setting. I often use the site to look trends when betting on football in real-life, and I can assure you that I make more than I lose.
Hunting is McCain's thing, so he says.
McCain announces 'sportsmen coalition' following questions of Romney's hunting experience
You want a hunding President, you want Tommy Thompson. This one
not this one (center>, though he's a hunter too.
Sorry. What I meant was, what”s your plan B if Thompson doesn’t get in?
I see. You’re not capable of defining a Conservative and Moderate. You have no brain? You insane? What’s your problem?
It’s a mad race to lock up the hunters, eh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.