Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: econjack

Here’s unemotional clue #2.

Fact 1: It is widely reported that the vast majority of women want to have children if conditions are ‘right’, meaning there is a sense of security and stability.

Fact 2: Many abortions are decided on the basis of a lack of security and stability, meaning economic reasons. Other reasons are age, physical health and political views. But most decisions are economic in nature.

Fact 3: Nick Rockefeller has been said to brag that it was his family that was behind the women’s lib movemment with the aim of forcing women into the workplace and out of the home where they would otherwise raise children.

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2007/02/353636.shtml

Fact 4: GW Bush’s tax cuts have percentagewise been minimal; taxes are still at historically high levels.

There are more facts but these may suffice. Put these facts together, what do you see?


530 posted on 04/05/2007 2:15:06 PM PDT by Hostage (Fred Thompson will be President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage
Facts 1 and 2...no argument. Fact 3, I don't know the history of it and don't want to take the time to find out. Fact 4: ...taxes are still at historically high levels.

Really? Relative to what? Prior to the Kennedy tax cuts, the highest marginal tax rate was 92% on everything after $100,000. The current marginal tax rates are less than half of this, so how are they at "historically high levels?"

548 posted on 04/05/2007 2:22:36 PM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson