Posted on 04/05/2007 11:46:11 AM PDT by Esther Ruth
Results of Treason — Pelosi Brings Anarchy To U.S. Foreign Policy
Bill Wilson
By Bill Wilson, KIN Senior Analyst
WASH—Apr 5—KIN-- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit with Bashar Assad drew praise from various sectors of the world as a good first step toward peace in the Middle East, but her act of insolent treason brought anarchy to American foreign policy. Leaders of the terrorist groups Islamic Jihad and the Al Aksa Martyrs Brigade, as reported by WorldNetDaily, praised Pelosi.
These two organizations have carried out every recent terrorist attack in Israel and are based in Syria. And the Syrian Foreign Minister said that Pelosi’s visit took place because Americans and Europeans had realized their policy of isolating Syria has failed. Pelosi also found praise from former President Jimmy Carter, who recently wrote a book in support of the Palestinian terrorists.
Strange how praise for Pelosi’s visit with one of the world’s foremost sponsors of terrorism is coming from the terrorists themselves and a former U.S. President whose bungling of foreign policy thirty years ago accelerated the development of modern terrorism.
One has to ask: do these people, Pelosi and the likes of Carter, actually believe they are doing right by legitimizing terrorists and the policies of governments who kill Christians and Jews, who oppress women, who sell children into slavery and prostitution, who sponsor the death of the innocent around the world? Or are they just willing dupes? Or has the desire for fame and power overridden their good sense about America’s national defense?
Here is an example of just how far off track Pelosi is: The Washington Post reports that Pelosi announced she delivered a message to Assad from Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that "Israel was ready to engage in peace talks" with Syria. She also announced that Assad was ready to "resume the peace process." The problem: Olmert, according to his office, never entrusted any such message to Pelosi. Olmert’s office told Pelosi that Assad often has said he wanted peace, but there has been no change in his country’s peace policy. The Post concluded, “In other words, Ms. Pelosi not only misrepresented Israel's position but was virtually alone in failing to discern that Mr. Assad's words were mere propaganda.”
Fact is, the Constitution has granted foreign policy power to the chief executive of the nation-the President—for a reason. And the problem is that there are so many 1960’s radical anarchist communist-influenced politicians in Congressional leadership that they believe their personal missions far outweigh the laws of the land. Pelosi not only committed an act of treason by going against American policy toward an enemy during a time of war, she also misrepresented the position of another country to a terrorist-sponsoring regime. Proverbs 30:12 says, “There is a generation that are pure in their own eyes, and yet is not washed from their filthiness.”
Why do we allow these people to have passports? Between Jimmy Carter’s election supervision and Nancy Pelosi’s shuttle diplomacy, they are going to bring back the soviet Union by 2010.
She is staging a coup. She’s just too stupid to realize it. Take her into custody and escort her back to Washington.
This fool of a woman has more crust than a pie factory! She thinks that she is in charge.
When the democrats promised their mandate was to clean up corruption in Washington I nearly fell out of my chair. Pelosi’s recent idiocy only serves to further underscore one fact: corruption is the one constant that liberal democrats represent. Without corruption, without dirty contributions, without graft and payoffs, and without wiping their a$$es with the Constitution, they are nothing.
I seem to recall another administration that promised us “...the most ethical administration in the history of the United States.” We all know how that went.
mega delusions of grandeur
I am going to go out on a limb here and make a suggestion. (I do not think it is N-P place to do any foreign policy but it does make me think)
We refuse to have dialog with our enemy’s right? Why? You can’t make peace among friends therefore you have to engage your enemy face to face. I would love to see GWB in Tehran laying it out and making it clear just how we feel and what we will do ((face to face)).
I can’t help but be reminded of the movie 300 when the Spartan king Leonidas goes to talk with the Persian king of kings Xerxes. Clear and preset dialog leader to leader.
We are getting nothing done by ignoring the dialog portion of diplomacy. We don’t have to be nice just honest and clear. Isn’t that how we good Christians spread our message anyway?
Your thoughts——
By their "friends" shall ye know them.
Yeah, then what do we do when they hold him hostage??
FBI should arrest her and the other Congressional moonbats for illegally impersonating the Executive. There are a number of things, Constitutionally mandated as Executive only roles. To usurp them is a high crime.
Well, come on! After all, she is going to be President after the impeachment trials!
Genesis 12:3 I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee.
Then they are complete idiots that played right into our hands.
Ask yourself this: If GWB gets held hostage Cheney is now in charge!! Can you hear me now? Good..!!!!
(I think)
To engage your enemy with direct and frank talk does not make you friends. God will know the difference-
Besides if you also engage the enemy’s of your weaker friends I kind of think God would like that!
President Bush has become King Lear.
Pelosi is testing how MUCH "WE" love treason.. quantifiying it..
Not unless a lot of spinless Republicans vote to impeach. It takes a 2/3 vote to convict and last I looked the senate was 50/49/1
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.