[Excellence]

You will see one change between this and the original article which is setting the (average) water/CO2 absorption/emission properties to about 75-80% for water and 15-20% for CO2 compared with the (original) estimate of about 95%/5%.

In which of the links does he make this statement? I'm not seeing it, and in the last letter to the editor I wrote, I used the 95/5 ratio. If that's wrong, I really need to know. If we are going to successfully argue this, we need to work with the latest information so the people on the wrong (left) can't come back and say the people on the right (us) are lying. Thank you.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

In which of the links does he make this statement?

This link.

I posted it two comments down from the letter quote. I hadn't realized the article was an attachment. I thought one of those links in his email went to it.