To: Excellence
In which of the links does he make this statement?This link.
I posted it two comments down from the letter quote. I hadn't realized the article was an attachment. I thought one of those links in his email went to it.
98 posted on
04/06/2007 9:20:06 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Thank you. I just read a few lines; I’ll read the whole thing soon. But two things jumped out at me. One is that CO2 from fossil fuel burning is being differentiated from CO2 from all other sources, by some, almost giving it more influence than it deserves. The other is regarding water in the atmosphere as a vapor rather than a gas. In the letter I wrote to the editor I emphasized water’s influence as a gas, not a vapor. So it would appear I got that point correct for what it was worth. The bottom line of my point was that interglacial global warming is an inexorable juggernaut, an overwhelming force that cannot be removed by prayer-or carbon credits. Unless proved otherwise, I’m going to continue to run with that point. Thank you so much for taking the time to refer me to this paper.
101 posted on
04/06/2007 10:41:55 AM PDT by
Excellence
(Vote Dhimmocrat; Submit for Peace! (Bacon bits make great confetti.))
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Do you still have this paper?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson