[E. Pluribus Unum]

In this case the errors were discovered shortly after the time of publication, were discussed at the time (including in the journal where the original paper was published) and have been noted repeatedly since.

I presumed that you linked to one of these articles.

Show me something from your article that proves my article "fundamentally flawed."

As you said, "One thing at a time."

[M. Dodge Thomas]

The Realclimat.org link (and the discussion which follows, do a search in comments for “Essenhigh” and follow the links there) outlines the problems with the atmospheric chemistry and physics in Essenhigh’s paper. Essenhigh remains a “global warming skeptic’, but as far as I know he has not responded to professional criticism of this paper subsequent to 1992.