Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Assault of the 'Transies'(North American Union)
Military.com ^ | 4-2-2007 | Frank Gaffney

Posted on 04/02/2007 1:32:59 PM PDT by Trupolitik

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
For those of you who still deny the push for a North American Union, I hope you will consider the analysis of one of America's foremost Cold Warriors under President Reagan.

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. is President of the Center for Security Policy and lead-author of War Footing: Ten Steps America Must Take to Prevail in the War for the Free World. Mr. Gaffney formerly acted as the Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy during the Reagan Administration, following four years of service as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear Forces and Arms Control Policy. Previously, he was a professional staff member on the Senate Armed Services Committee under the chairmanship of the late Senator John Tower, and a national security legislative aide to the late Senator Henry M. Jackson.

1 posted on 04/02/2007 1:33:03 PM PDT by Trupolitik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik

Can someone PING the anti-NAU folks?


2 posted on 04/02/2007 1:33:57 PM PDT by Trupolitik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik
Transnational Progressivism? Why do we need new names for these things? It's Trotskyism:

Trotskyists regard themselves as working in opposition to both capitalism and Stalinism as embodied by the leadership of the Soviet Union after Vladimir Lenin's death. Trotsky advocated proletarian revolution as set out in his theory of "permanent revolution", and believed that a workers' state would not be able to hold out against the pressures of a hostile capitalist world unless socialist revolutions quickly took hold in other countries as well. This theory was advanced in opposition to the view held by the Stalinists that "socialism in one country" could be built in the Soviet Union alone.

3 posted on 04/02/2007 1:36:15 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Enoch Powell was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik

Not the trannies?


4 posted on 04/02/2007 1:36:32 PM PDT by pissant (The new Fred Astaire: Rudy Rodham Bloomberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik
[... the assault on our sovereignty by the “transnational progressives.” ..]

Fancy term for traitor.. because its exactly what the term means.. a camouflage term..

5 posted on 04/02/2007 1:38:55 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik

Bump for later


6 posted on 04/02/2007 1:42:19 PM PDT by dvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Let me add a few points:

1) My quote is from wikipedia.
2) Stalin was a socialist who wanted socialism in one country. Which is to say, National Socialism. He had an alliance with Adolf Hitler (another National Socialist).
3) Trotsky thought Stalin didn't go far enough in his communist beliefs. The folks who think Hitler was "right-wing" are folks who were further Left than Stalin. That's Trotsky.
4) The Fourth International carries the banner of Communism today and they are far more active and influential than people think. They promote Trotsky's belief's.

People shouldn't pay attention to Marx. Marxism is truly dead. But Trotsky, Gramsci, and the Frankfurt School are (sadly) alive and kicking.

7 posted on 04/02/2007 1:43:15 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Enoch Powell was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik

save bump


8 posted on 04/02/2007 1:47:17 PM PDT by Edgerunner (I am here to learn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edgerunner

While we support President Bush in the war on terror in Iraq, he is taking our freedoms through his push for an American Union. People need to speak out.


9 posted on 04/02/2007 1:55:54 PM PDT by paguch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik
however, we will inexorably find ourselves neither sovereign, secure nor free. //////////////////
This is the reason that bush won't defend the borders. He's a transnational progressive.

As bolton says one consequence of transnational progressiveism -- is that we are not secure.

According to this piece.More Americans killed by illegal aliens than Iraq war. When you start digging into the numbers the only ones that can be sourced with the feds are the number of American murdered in 2005: 16692
I have seen federal numbers for illegals held in jail ranging from 19.3% to 27% of the federal prison population. Here's a sampling of USA cities wanted for murder. What you'll see is that in big USA cities like LA or NYC most of the murderers are Hispanic. Unknown are the % of illegals. In smaller cities about 25% of the most wanted are illegals wanted for murder. This number agrees with the percentage of illegals incarcerated in federal prisons. +-25%

Pictures of top 10 most wanted in LA

Wanted for Murder in New York City.

Chicago wanted for Murder



New Orleans wanted for Murder



FBI USA 10 most wanted. (two of 10 are Mexican nationals)

10 posted on 04/02/2007 2:01:23 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik

read tonight BUMP!


11 posted on 04/02/2007 2:05:23 PM PDT by Pagey (Horrible Hillary Clinton is Bad For America, Bad For Business and Bad For MY Stomach!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

That is definitely correct. President Bush is not securing the border and he signed the SPP agreement because he is most definitely a "transnationalist".

I prefer Nationalism as enumerated by our Constitution.


12 posted on 04/02/2007 2:06:49 PM PDT by Trupolitik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: ClearCase_guy
I always thought it was ironic that the, "workers' state" (USSR) had to resort to prison labor the get things done, especially construction. Then in many cases much of the labor was dissidents of the worker state.

Socialism shows its effects in the USA, because there is a demand for labor that is not filled it own natives.

14 posted on 04/02/2007 2:12:37 PM PDT by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Trupolitik; All

Trouble with SSP/NAU is it's painstakingly slow implimentation. (probably by design) Most Americans have no idea anything is happening.


What steps, other than buying airtime, can the average American take to fight this thing??


16 posted on 04/02/2007 2:17:37 PM PDT by wolfcreek (Semi-Conservatism Won't Cut It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks; milford421; Founding Father; DAVEY CROCKETT; dalereed; Quix; griswold3; tmp02; ...
PING to those who are against a North American Union!
17 posted on 04/02/2007 2:23:00 PM PDT by Trupolitik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks; milford421; Founding Father; DAVEY CROCKETT; dalereed; Quix; griswold3; tmp02; ...
PING to those who are against a North American Union!
18 posted on 04/02/2007 2:23:21 PM PDT by Trupolitik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Trupolitik

THANKS.


19 posted on 04/02/2007 2:32:03 PM PDT by Quix (AN AUTHENTIC RELATIONSHIP WITH JESUS CHRIST AND SPIRITUAL WARFARE PREVENTS ET ABDUCTIONS, STOPS SAME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

I would suggest the following:

1. Continue to raise awareness online and with the people around you.

2. Write authors, analysts, think tanks, etc that are Nationalist minded. (Such as the Center for Security Policy which has just entered the fray) and urge them to report about the issue.

3. Call local, regional, and national talk radio.

4. Write and Call your Senators and Reps.

If we all do this, we will eventually reach critical mass. Already there is some effect as several peices of legislation has been written to stop SPP.gov, the NAFTA Superhighway/Trans-Texas Corridor, etc.

Also, 13 state legislatures are proposing legislation against a SPP/NAU. Even if symbolic, it demonstrates that serious analysts and serious representatives and servants of the People of the United States and the Constitution are against the SPP/NAU.


20 posted on 04/02/2007 2:36:45 PM PDT by Trupolitik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson