Assault of the 'Transies'(North American Union)

Military.com ^ | 4-2-2007 | Frank Gaffney

[pinz-n-needlez]

This notion explains a lot of otherwise unexplainable behavior to me.

When I get back next week, I can look more closely.

In the meantime, I’m wondering what you all think of this. (tinfoil optional)

[EternalVigilance]

Anything from Frank Gaffney can be counted on to edify and enlighten. Thanks.

[milford421]

Thanks for the ping.

[EternalVigilance]

These “trannies” are the modern-day equivilents of Ishmael...selling our heritage for a mess of pottage - a mere bowl of soup.

Genesis Chapter 25

29 Now Jacob cooked a stew; and Esau came in from the field, and he was weary. 30 And Esau said to Jacob, “Please feed me with that same red stew, for I am weary.” Therefore his name was called Edom.[d]
31 But Jacob said, “Sell me your birthright as of this day.”
32 And Esau said, “Look, I am about to die; so what is this birthright to me?”
33 Then Jacob said, “Swear to me as of this day.”
So he swore to him, and sold his birthright to Jacob. 34 And Jacob gave Esau bread and stew of lentils; then he ate and drank, arose, and went his way. Thus Esau despised his birthright.

[theFIRMbss]

>Not the trannies?

That would have made for a much more interesting thread than this one will be . . .

[x]

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

[Trupolitik]

you can probably find such an article on a lib site. ;-)

[nw_arizona_granny]

Thanks.

[pissant]

At least post a good one...

[Kakaze]

Thank you for the ping, I appreciate it!

[Chani]

Thanx for the ping.

[F-117A]

Thanks!

[Trupolitik]

Thank all of you for being vigilant.

[Czar]

"*The Bush Administration has launched some two-dozen “working groups” to develop a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) with Canada and Mexico. Loosely modeled after the Transies’ favorite supranational organization -- the European Union -- and evolving in much the same way (namely, under the rubric of an economic common market agreement, in this case NAFTA), the SPP’s architects are busily crafting sweeping new rules to develop a North American Union (NAU)."

Any president supporting such a scheme is in breach of his oath of office. Simple as that.

[hedgetrimmer]

PING

[Duke Nukum]

While we support President Bush in the war on terror in Iraq, he is taking our freedoms through his push for an American Union. People need to speak out.

I'm kind of confused about it. If the President is just going to surrender to the Cesspool of Mexico anyway, why are we fighting in Iraq? Just send in the Mexican army.

I mean, what is the point of fighting a war on terror to preserve American ideals if he's just going to sign America away?

More and more it seems like the argument between the Democratics and the President is who to surrender to. The President wants to surrender to Mexico while the Democratics want to surrender to Mexico, Al Qaeda, Cuba, Venezuela, the USSR, Red China, etc.

[hedgetrimmer]

This doesn’t even take into account all the other ‘working groups’ working to destroy American culture and our government of indivdiual rights and equal justice.

[Czar]

"This doesn’t even take into account all the other ‘working groups’..."

Mostly NGOs unaccountable to the American people. Much different when elected officials are involved. I consider breach of oath of office a very serious matter, especially when the top level of government is involved. Anyone working to cede American sovereignty to some unaccountable shadow government is a traitor and deserves the harshest of treatment.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Man, I really have to start arming myself soon...

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

I wonder if the Transie club includes the five black-robed imbeciles who just ruled that the EPA has the power to regulate CO2 emissions from automobiles?