Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How we can fight Tehran (David Frum)
National Post - Canada ^ | Saturday, March 31, 2007 | David Frum

Posted on 03/31/2007 12:33:12 PM PDT by GMMAC

How we can fight Tehran

David Frum, National Post
Published: Saturday, March 31, 2007


The Iranian seizure of 15 British naval personnel is an outrage -- and an opportunity. Iran invaded Iraqi territorial waters, attacked British naval personnel enforcing resolutions of the UN Security Council and committed an act of piracy and kidnapping.

Iran then displayed its captives on national television and compelled them to read coerced political statements. It forced the captured female sailor to wear the Islamic hijab, a violation of her Geneva Convention right to practice her own religion.

These violent and lawless actions have shocked British and European public opinion. But they should not have surprised anyone.

Iran has routinely used kidnapping as a tool of state. It kidnapped eight British sailors in 2004, and 52 American diplomats in 1979-81. Iran's Hezbollah surrogates kidnapped Americans, Britons and others in Lebanon in the 1980s. They kidnapped Israeli soldiers in 2000 and again this past summer, triggering a war.

Iran has committed graver crimes too. Iranian agents have committed murder on the soil of the United States, France and Germany -- and carried out mass-casualty terror attacks in Saudi Arabia and Argentina.

Today, Iran is racing to build a nuclear bomb, violating its commitments under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. And too many in Europe shrug their shoulders.

This latest crisis, however, opens a chance to mobilize European opinion to action.

One of their own has been attacked and threatened with the prolonged abuse of its military personnel. The story will appear on television night after night after night. The longer it continues, the more British people and other Europeans will wonder: Is there anything we can do? And the good news is: Yes, there is.

The bullying, blustering bravado of the Iranians should not conceal the truth that Iran is massively vulnerable to international pressure. For example:

- Iran's decrepit refineries cannot produce enough gasoline for Iranian drivers. So, although Iran is a major oil exporter, it must import 40% of its gasoline. An international embargo on gasoline sales to Iran would inflict severe distress. Earlier this month, Iran raised the (deeply subsidized) price of gasoline from 34 cents a gallon to 50 cents. Some in the regime are considering imposing rationing--a move that would badly damage what remains of the mullahs' popularity.

- Iran's rusting industries, many of them state owned, depend heavily on parts and equipment imported from Germany. Two-thirds of these sales benefit from export credit guarantees from the German government. As of 2005,Germany had extended some US$6.2-billion worth of credit to Iran. That number has been cut in recent months. But if Germany were to follow Japan's lead and cut its credits to zero, Iranian companies would have to pay more for parts --and some would be forced out of business altogether. The Central Bank of Iran estimates unemployment at more than 12%. Many private economists think the real figure closer to 20% --and higher still for young Iranians.

- The United States has maintained sanctions against Iranian oil and natural gas since 1979. The European Union, however, has continued to invest in Iran. The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that foreign companies, mostly European, have invested US$30-billion in Iran since 1996. Without this investment, Iran's oil and gas output would have faltered long ago.

It's time now for Europeans to join the American ban on investment in Iran's energy sector. Such a ban would deal a painful blow to Iran's economy, which has little to sell beside oil and gas. Iran suffers an inflation rate over 20%, suggesting that the Iranian government is already overspending its oil and gas revenues. Squeeze those revenues, and you squeeze the regime.

- Not all firms investing in Iran are European. Malaysia's Petronas and Russia's Gazprom both play major roles. Till now, firms doing business in Iran have been allowed to do business not only in the EU but also in the United States. It's time now to impose a secondary boycott, and to force firms like Petronas to decide: Either you do business with Iran or you do business with the rest of the planet. You choose.

Since 9/11, Europeans have pleaded with the U.S. to rely on sanctions and diplomacy rather than force. Fine. Let's see some sanctions then -- real sanctions, not the wrist-slaps imposed till now.

Iran has been waging war on the world; it's time the world organized in countervailing self-defense. And if anything is needed to stiffen our collective will, let's broadcast one more time that image of Faye Turney, cloaked against her will in that black headscarf of subordination and humiliation.

© National Post 2007


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: genevaconvention; iran; islamofascism; sailors

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

1 posted on 03/31/2007 12:33:15 PM PDT by GMMAC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fanfan; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; Ryle; ...

PING!
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

2 posted on 03/31/2007 12:34:29 PM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
--great ideas , all requiring the backbone that the west doesn't have anymore--
3 posted on 03/31/2007 12:40:31 PM PDT by rellimpank (-don't believe anything the MSM states about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

This is the most succinct, logical statement on this issue I have seen yet. Although military action will be necessary sooner or later, it is clear that the mullahs can be hit hard and quickly without a shot being fired. However, the problem is that the Euros (and a sizable proportion of influential Americans) are motivated entirely by short-term profits, to the exclusion of patriotism and national survival.


4 posted on 03/31/2007 12:48:18 PM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
I agree, even Bush and Blair, two of the West's strongest leaders are now a weak points in their administrations. However, Iran may have gone too far.
Clearly, strong action is required. That refinery is a weak point. How about sabotaging the refinery at a key point like its computer center, where it would be disabled for a while, but not destroyed. They might get the message. If that doesn't work, embargo their oil.
5 posted on 03/31/2007 12:51:35 PM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

to David Frum: M O A B

That was easy .. now what other problem do you have ..??


6 posted on 03/31/2007 1:11:50 PM PDT by CyberAnt ("... first time in history the U.S. House has attempted to surrender via C-SPAN TV ...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgefromGeorgia
IMHO, Tony Blair is a mere girlie-man compared to Australia's marvelous John Howard.

While Blair's apparent devotion to the WOT is doubtless admirable, Hillary Clinton herself would be justifiably proud of the nanny state, social fascist devastation Tony & his vile wife Cheri have inflicted on the British home-front.

Plus, while acting reasonably tough abroad, Blair's weak-kneed, politically correct pandering to domestic Muslims - particulary hard-core extremists - has been virtually non-stop.

It's always amazed me how Blair gets cut so much slack among conservatives - especially Stateside - when this his actual overall track record.
Lady Thatcher (God bless her!) would have by now shown these Iranian Islamofascist vermin a whole 'nother level of British resolve & toughness - light years beyond what we'll sadly see from Blair.
7 posted on 03/31/2007 1:36:20 PM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
Since 9/11, Europeans have pleaded with the U.S. to rely on sanctions and diplomacy rather than force. Fine. Let's see some sanctions then -- real sanctions, not the wrist-slaps imposed till now.

Well stated. The Europeans have been quick to criticize the United States; let them actually do something for a change.

8 posted on 03/31/2007 1:37:07 PM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
All good points. Blair has supported Bush. I realize that Blair has spent much to shore up the nanny state in the UK, however, I don't think he has reversed the Thatcher changes. Lady Thatcher is one of my heroes. She and Reagan were a good pair. Leaders like that don't come around enough. Or should I say that they don't get elected when they come around enough.
I think Rudy Guiliani may be one of those kinds of leaders. We'll see.
9 posted on 03/31/2007 3:03:17 PM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Logophile; GMMAC

"The Europeans have been quick to criticize the United States; let them actually do something for a change."

From the tone of some of the UK blogs I've lurked, plus some early polling I heard about, the initial outrage has pretty much faded into a hand-wringing session crossed with bleating about how the nasty neocon warmongers, led by the evil Bush, will now use this as an excuse to invade yet another peaceloving.....

I can only relate so much of that bilge before I worry about barfing on my keyboard.

The short and sweet(?) answer I'm getting is that the US will get to pull this iron out of the fire...AGAIN, that at the conclusion of the exercise, the US will catch general he** from all directions in hindsight...AGAIN and the UK, UE, UN et al will go merrily skipping off into the next little socialist workers' paradise sh**hole and expect to get bailed out mo' skosh, and please don't get mud on the carpet.

GRRRRRRRRR

Sometimes these buttheads make a prizewinning case for becoming a hermit.


10 posted on 03/31/2007 3:54:25 PM PDT by Unrepentant VN Vet (Liberalism is the slow path to tyranny. Socialism is quicker, just not so hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

What are the chances that this new Iranian crisis will push Western Europe more toward conservative leadership?


11 posted on 03/31/2007 4:27:26 PM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung
While it may well be too late for old Europe to reverse its tailspin - negative birthrate, entrenched moral relativism, etc. - I'd be more inclined to see on-going social friction caused by its ever-growing Muslim minority as a more likely change-motivating factor.

Can't see any mere sudden crisis of any sort shaking things up to any lasting degree ... a nuclear-based Islamofascist terror attack on European soil, maybe.
12 posted on 03/31/2007 4:44:05 PM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson