Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver
Earlier, Sampson said that Gonzales had wrongly said he was not involved in discussions about the firings of the eight U.S. attorneys.

If Sampson is correct about Gonzales' involvement, why the hell did Gonzales say he was not involved? It's the strangest thing.
8 posted on 03/29/2007 10:19:56 AM PDT by HaveHadEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HaveHadEnough
If Sampson is correct about Gonzales' involvement, why the hell did Gonzales say he was not involved? It's the strangest thing.

The last I read on it what Gonzales said was that he didn't recall any meetings and it turns out he had attended two meetings in which it was discussed over the course of two years.

18 posted on 03/29/2007 11:15:28 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson