Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats say McCain nearly abandoned GOP
The Hill ^ | March 29, 2007 | Bob Cusack

Posted on 03/29/2007 9:56:54 AM PDT by jubail

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) was close to leaving the Republican Party in 2001, weeks before then-Sen. Jim Jeffords (Vt.) famously announced his decision to become an Independent, according to former Democratic lawmakers who say they were involved in the discussions.

In interviews with The Hill this month, former Sen. Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) and ex-Rep. Tom Downey (D-N.Y.) said there were nearly two months of talks with the maverick lawmaker following an approach by John Weaver, McCain’s chief political strategist.

Democrats had contacted Jeffords and then-Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R-R.I.) in the early months of 2001 about switching parties, but in McCain’s case, they said, it was McCain’s top strategist who came to them.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; gop; jeffords; johnmccain; mccain; republicans; rino; vietnam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: jubail

You mean he stayed? Looking at his votes, I wonder. Go on John, run for Pres as a Dem.


21 posted on 03/29/2007 10:13:14 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jubail

I'm shocked! I thought McCain was the last Reagan Republican in the party.

I have to run know the mothership is waiting.


22 posted on 03/29/2007 10:13:51 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (I voted Republican because no Conservatives were running.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jubail
All too pathetic. Can only say I appreciate his stand for our Military and the War.

Too bad he could not muster some personal loyalty for the rest of Repub Party principles to go with it.

23 posted on 03/29/2007 10:14:07 AM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
They are out to damage him but the timing makes me think it's for another reason. If it was because of his run for the GOP nomination, they would have broken this story when he was running strong not now when he's fading on his own. I think, because he is weak, they don't want to tolerate his pro Iraq stance any longer and have decided to weaken him further.
24 posted on 03/29/2007 10:15:31 AM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jubail

John "Judas" McLame will NEVER be President or be nominated by the GOP.

Of the three looser currently supported by the mainstream media, Giuliani is the most likely as the least offensive.

But hopefully SOMEONE - perhaps FRED THOMPSON - will rescue his party - and the Nation - from a devil's choice in 2008.


25 posted on 03/29/2007 10:15:43 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jubail
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) was close to leaving the Republican Party in 2001...

That's a problem. I was softening a little toward McCain because of his strong support of the Iraq war and the fact he is a real American hero.

If Romney isn't electable, it's time to step up the draft Fred Thompson campaign.

26 posted on 03/29/2007 10:17:14 AM PDT by MovementConservative (Run Fred run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jubail

Don't let the door hit you on the @$$ on the way out, McCain...


27 posted on 03/29/2007 10:17:27 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: if his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drpix

You posted the composite vote. McCain didn't do that well with members only.
Member Opinion
Fred Thompson 47.3% 635
Duncan Hunter 17.2% 231
Newt Gingrich 9.5% 127
Rudy Giuliani 9.4% 126
Undecided/pass 5.1% 68
Ron Paul 3.8% 51
Mit Romney 3.2% 43
Tom Tancredo 3.2% 43
Other 1.0% 13
John McCain 0.4% 6
100.1% 1,343


28 posted on 03/29/2007 10:18:31 AM PDT by magslinger (Submission? That's a bit of a problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: drpix

Re post 13, you mean that to this minute the Rudybots account for only 10 percent? I hope that such a percentage holds. It'll prove that they have a crocodile mouth but backed up by only a hummingbird ass.


29 posted on 03/29/2007 10:18:37 AM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: drpix

The Hill is a liberal paper, I think. So the question is why are the Dems attacking him now and not later?


30 posted on 03/29/2007 10:18:44 AM PDT by bnelson44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: incredulous joe

Right ... I mean, who knew?


31 posted on 03/29/2007 10:19:14 AM PDT by Let's Roll ("the left is rearranging the beach to make sure the tsunami comes in as unimpeded as possible." -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jubail

Boy, we sure were lucky, huh?!?!?!?!?!........


32 posted on 03/29/2007 10:19:25 AM PDT by Red Badger (If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jubail
Note that McCain contacted the Democrats first about switching parties. The Dems did not initiate the idea. And there are actually Republicans that want this guy to lead the party in 2008?

Hmmm ... McCain or Rudy. The guy who thought about becoming a Democrat, versus the guy who should go ahead and become a Democrat, given his views are more consistent with the Dem platform than the GOP platform.

Lovely choice. I think I'll wait for a better one.

33 posted on 03/29/2007 10:20:55 AM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

You dislike the man even more than I do. I gave him the benefit of 00.3% more popularity.


34 posted on 03/29/2007 10:21:04 AM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
This rumor has been around for a long time. Back in June 2001 McCain said, "I have no intention of leaving the Republican Party, nor have I ever displayed any intention." Today a McCain spokeman told Power Line blog.."John McCain never considered leaving the Republican party. Any statement to the contrary is inaccurate and merely election year politics."

I suspect this is nothing more than some denizens inhabiting the world of politics who have set out to negate McCain's extremely effective voice on the war and his opposition to the "retreat and defeat" bill passed in Congress.

35 posted on 03/29/2007 10:22:14 AM PDT by Lecie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
The surprise is that we are willing to fall all over ourselves to believe what a Democrat strategist is quoted in the Hill as saying about a Republican candidate.

I am no fan McCain, but I agree with your assessment here.

36 posted on 03/29/2007 10:23:03 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
McCain wouldn't fit the left's anti-war agenda anyway.

What makes you think that McCain's position du jour has anything to do with core principle? When in doubt, consult my tagline.

37 posted on 03/29/2007 10:23:32 AM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
Why now and not later? He's fading now on his own. He can't even raise money anymore. So I've got to ask: Why - if they feared his nomination - didn't they hit him earlier when he was a real contender?
38 posted on 03/29/2007 10:26:39 AM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething
Truthfully, I've never met anyone who is 'for' McCain. On the forum or in person.

I've met some in person. Those people happened to be democrat party folks, though.

39 posted on 03/29/2007 10:28:46 AM PDT by Triggerhippie (Always use a silencer in a crowd. Loud noises offend people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jubail

No, I believe these Democrats are lying. Or else like like smitten spinsters, they got their hopes up over political sweet talk.


40 posted on 03/29/2007 10:32:22 AM PDT by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson