Posted on 03/28/2007 12:35:13 PM PDT by NoneOfTheAbove
Bump! Sadly...
I think when all is said and done there will be no date for removing the troops.
But rest assured that the Democrats are working in league with their Muslim puppet masters to do their bidding here.
Boortz is an idiot for rallying people to vote against Republicans last November. It is because of guys like him that the Democrats control the House and Senate. He has no right to criticize anything the Congress does because it's partially his fault that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi run Congress.
read later
Not sure what you've been reading, but I read Nealz Nuze every day and he was a strong supporter of Republicans in the last election. Certainly he lamented the dismal domestic spending policies of the administration, but he has been an extremely strong supporter of the WOT and a constant critic of the D'rats and the surrender scum.
Sadly, we may lose a city before this is over.
THAT is how you know withdrawal timetables are a bad idea.
- posted on 03/26/2007 7:09:52 AM CDT by RayStacy
You're quite wrong about that. Do shut up.
Her's MY
NOTICE TO ALL FOREIGN CITIZENS and THEIR GOVERNMENTS!
(EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY)
1. As a sovereign nation, you have the same rights to govern your nation as we have. Whether freely elected or despotic tyranny, how you run your government and DOMESTIC affairs is between you and your leaders. If you people don't like how your government is behaving, we suggest you read some American history for the period between, say, 1774 and 1789. The world is awash in various sorts of small arms and other weapons. Getting enough to turn out your tyrant-du-jour ought not be a problem. Yes, many people will die (just as they did HERE in the late 1700s). It's the price of freedom. But -- and this is important to us -- our SOLDIERS will not be among them. But trust us when we tell you that the casualties of your revolution will pale compared to those you will suffer should we be forced to invoke Clause 3!
2. Please pay SPECIAL attention to the word "domestic" in number 1.
3. The MINUTE we become privy to firm, corroborated intelligence that you have plans to harm the United States or one of our recognized allies -- or, worst case -- DO, in fact carry out such an operation, the United States and any such allies who wish to assist will come to you and request that you cease and desist. If you refuse to do so, we will TURN MOST OF YOUR LAND INTO A SMOKING RUIN. We include in this list of threats AIDING, ABETTING, HARBORING, TRAINING OR SUPPLYING THOSE WHO, ALTHOUGH NOT CITIZENS OF YOUR NATION, MAKE PLANS TO HARM US OR AN ALLY.
We wish to live and trade in peace with all peoples -- BUT harm us or injure/kill American/allied citizens AND YOUR WORLD AS YOU HAVE KNOWN IT WILL SIMPLY GO AWAY -- FOREVER.
(If you have never seen it, slide on down to Blockbuster and rent "The Day the Earth Stood Still" with Arabic/Farsi subtitles, of course. REREAD 3 AND THINK "GORT.")
4. Once those smoking ruins have sufficiently cooled, we will put boots on the ground, clear any remaining resistance and seize your former property for the benefit of those who participated in the neutralization of the threat you posed. Casualties among our troops should be very limited because, as we think you have seen, the weapons possessed by the United States will leave very few to resist. REREAD 4 AND THINK 51st STATE!
QUESTIONS????
Thank you for your support in this vital matter.
The People of the United States of America
"When I was finally standing in a voting booth last week with a ballot in hand I just couldn't bring myself to vote Republican. To be honest, there was no Republican running for Congress or the Senate ... and with the fight against Islamic fascism being the paramount issue I might well have voted for Republicans there .. but since there were none, it was a straight Libertarian vote for me. Where Libertarians weren't running I wrote in Clark Howard."
http://boortz.com/nuze/200611/11132006.html
If only.
I wouldn't call this sarcasm, but it sure is a bucket of cold water in our faces.
Note that Neal wrote this the day after the election, not before. Now try to get it through your head that he was writing about his personal experience at the voting booth. THERE WERE NO REPUBLICANS RUNNING FOR FEDERAL OFFICE IN HIS VOTING DISTRICT!!! He couldn't vote republican if he wanted to. THERE WERE NO REPUBLICANS ON THE BALLOT! /vent
Before the election, and since, he's been very critical of the cut and runners, and supportive of Bush's stance in the WOT. Neal's a libertarian, even though he doesn't see exactly eye-to-eye with the Libertarian party. But in the 2006 election he was a strong supporter of Republicans.
Your right he did rally people against the republicans I heard him do it on one of the Fox shows.
You skipped a part of what he said:
"When I was finally standing in a voting booth last week with a ballot in hand I JUST COULDN'T BRING MYSELF TO VOTE REPUBLICAN"
He was speaking metaphorically when he said there were no Republicans running in his voting district. I'm not sure if he votes in Georgia or Florida, but every district in Georgia had a Republican running.
And in Florida, Katherine Harris was running for Senate statewide.
If you're so sure, just who was he supporting? Did he come out in favor of someone other than a Republican? Or was he simply bemoaning some of the Republican positions like NCLB, CFR, the largest collection of pork in the nation's history,...?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.