Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where does Fred Thompson stand on abortion
Race42008 ^ | March 27, 2007 | DaveG

Posted on 03/27/2007 1:40:16 PM PDT by RepublicanPOTUSin08

Let’s settle this once and for all...

Having done actual research on this subject to get to the truth, I’ve concluded that Sen. Thompson a) is, and has always been, opposed to the notion of a constitutional right to an abortion; b) is, and has always been, in favor of banning partial-birth abortion; c) is, and has always been, in favor of restrictions on most later-term abortions (post-first trimester); and d) is now across-the-board pro-life, but in the 1990s, was in favor of earlier-term abortions (first-trimester) remaining legal...

If you pick up the 1994 post-election edition of National Right to Life news, you’ll see a list of pro-life Senators elected in the class of ‘94. Thomspon was on the list, with a cross by it.

The cross stood for Thompson’s support for legal 1st Trimester abortion. He was generally pro-life, but supported abortion during the 1st trimester...

As such, Thompson’s voting record is consistent with his 1994 position: he’s pro-life on everything other than making first-trimester abortions illegal...

What seems to be clear is that Thompson has never supported the constitutional right to an abortion, has never supported partial-birth abortion, and has never been opposed to restrictions on post-first-trimester abortions. Further, Thompson’s opposition to Roe means that he’d have no problem with states prohibiting or regulating first-trimester abortions. Thompson has only parted with pro-lifers on first-trimester abortions, a stance that a) may have since changed over the past decade and that b) is moot for all practical purposes, as sufficient political support for banning these abortions at the federal level just doesn’t exist regardless of what the Supreme Court does.

(Excerpt) Read more at race42008.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; fred; fredthompson; prolife; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-198 next last
To: RepublicanPOTUSin08
That's a decent question.

Personally have asked, twice, on two threads, whether or not he supports Roe vs. Wade.

Unless his response was buried somewhere deep in the ping menu/list, no freeper has answered that question.

21 posted on 03/27/2007 1:54:01 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

Really? When did Russert interview him? I'd love a link to that! Just the thought of Russert trying his intimidation on Thompson fills me with delight!


22 posted on 03/27/2007 1:54:38 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
I am having a very difficult time accepting a candidate who supported McCain-Feingold.

But out of the top three candidates, Thompson is the only one who has seen the light.

23 posted on 03/27/2007 1:55:46 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
ping

your answer is here...


24 posted on 03/27/2007 1:56:31 PM PDT by APRPEH (Hillary probably wouldn't approve, but I can live with that....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: APRPEH

Funny how now that Fred Thompson appears to be a viable candidate, he's being held to a higher standard of scrutiny than the others.

Rudy... yay.. he's our guy.
Mitt... yay.. he's our guy.
Duncan... yay.. he's our guy.
Tom... yay.. he's our guy.

Fred... hmmm, exactly where does he stand on the issues?


25 posted on 03/27/2007 1:57:48 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RepublicanPOTUSin08
Curious, who runs race42008.com and why should we trust everything they say? I've seen several anti-Thompson articles today cited from here. I would like to know who owns the site and if they are affiliated with another candidate.
26 posted on 03/27/2007 1:58:50 PM PDT by mnehring (Virtus Junxit Mors Non Seperabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
"I still have a hard time believing this is the most important issue to alot of you."

Why wouldn't it be?? Killing babies is murder, no matter who advocates it. But dear Rudy has other negatives, too---notably his stances on stealing guns, and kissing up to queers--to name only two.

27 posted on 03/27/2007 2:01:45 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

The author of this piece seems to be defending Thompson against bloggers who are claiming Thompson is pro-abortion.


28 posted on 03/27/2007 2:02:02 PM PDT by RepublicanPOTUSin08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RepublicanPOTUSin08
With Socialism, Marxism and terrorism knocking on our back door is this the only thing important to Conservatives? Excuse me, there will, by my beliefs be a judgment day. For those killing their children and those advocating the right to do so, in the end...

FLAME AWAY!!
29 posted on 03/27/2007 2:02:40 PM PDT by poobear (This "culture of corruption" has been festering on both sides for too long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
It's odd you didn't receive a response.. Fred's voting record is strongly pro-life.
http://postpolitical.com/ppblog/2007/03/19/fred-thompsons-voting-record-by-issue-category/

Also found this article from a more credible source than the blog source on this thread:
http://www.nationalreview.com/daily/nr070600.html
30 posted on 03/27/2007 2:02:41 PM PDT by mnehring (Virtus Junxit Mors Non Seperabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Any of the 'dings' you and the others post on this forum considering Mr. Thompson are inconsequential compared to the train wreck baggage carried by Rudy McRomney.

He is the most conservative choice we have that has the best chance of winning the election, IMO.
31 posted on 03/27/2007 2:02:50 PM PDT by Pox (Just say NO to RINO Rudy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
who runs race42008.com

Someone who likes privacy...

Registrant:
   Domains by Proxy, Inc.
   DomainsByProxy.com
   15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
   Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
   United States
 
   Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
   Domain Name: RACE42008.COM
      Created on: 29-Mar-06
      Expires on: 29-Mar-08
      Last Updated on: 29-Jan-07
 
   Administrative Contact:
      Private, Registration  DBP@domainsbyproxy.com
      Domains by Proxy, Inc.
      DomainsByProxy.com
      15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
      Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
      United States
      (480) 624-2599
 
   Technical Contact:
      Private, Registration  DBP@domainsbyproxy.com
      Domains by Proxy, Inc.
      DomainsByProxy.com
      15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
      Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
      United States
      (480) 624-2599
 
   Domain servers in listed order:
      NS1.BLUEHOST.COM
      NS2.BLUEHOST.COM

32 posted on 03/27/2007 2:04:37 PM PDT by Enosh (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RepublicanPOTUSin08
The author of this piece seems to be defending Thompson against bloggers who are claiming Thompson is pro-abortion.

I don't know, it seems to me an almost viral way of telling people he actually is for first-trimester abortions.. if you look at a lot of the political viral attacks over the past few elections, you will see patterns where they plan info but then add a few lines here and there to cause doubt or try to split people...

This may be nothing, but I know there are a lot of people out there who would love nothing more than to see our side split and are threatened by a possible candidate that could unite our side again..

33 posted on 03/27/2007 2:05:09 PM PDT by mnehring (Virtus Junxit Mors Non Seperabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
You do know he's on wife number 2, and she's young enough to be his daughter, right?

Fred is the man!

34 posted on 03/27/2007 2:05:26 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (The Hunt for Fred November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Pesky tagline...


35 posted on 03/27/2007 2:05:39 PM PDT by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

for someone like me our country is great when our country is good. When we cease to be good it puts at peril the things that make it great. Abortion is immoral and is impacting our economy, our future and the moral underpinnings of our future. We are quite literally killing the generation that will inherit this country and and instead are giving it away to people who do not embrace - as I've already said - the things that made us great.


36 posted on 03/27/2007 2:06:18 PM PDT by Frapster (Don't mind me - I'm distracted by the pretty lights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

You don't consider murder of the unborn an important issue?


37 posted on 03/27/2007 2:07:23 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek (President Fred Thompson will finally give the University of Memphis the respect that it is due!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry

DITTO FROM RUSH MORNING UPDATE

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_032607/content/01125101.member.html


Labor leaders recently gathered in Las Vegas to lay the groundwork for the 2008 elections. They're pretty open about their battle plan, folks.

John Sweeney, the big gun of the AFL-CIO, is promising the next election cycle will see the "greatest involvement" ever from big labor. (And that's a hefty promise, considering what unions did for Democrats last time.)

In their "get-out-every-kook vote," unions spent $100 million. They contacted tens of millions of voters by phone and by mail. They conducted a door-to-door intimidation exerscise -- uh, "canvassing effort." (Sorry.) Political action committees also spent $60 million; that's up 11 percent from the previous election cycle.

So that 160 million bucks does not include, though, the tens of millions Democrats raised from other sources, like George Soros, or other political action committees and think tanks run by Clinton-machine guys like Serpent Head and The Forehead -- James Carville and Paul Begala.

So, you conservative activists out there, consider this an early warning. For now, quit worrying about the nomination. John McCain and Russ Feingold stripped the Republican Party of major resources when so-called Campaign Finance Reform was signed into law. It didn't get the money out of politics -- it got Republicans out of office! Your immediate job is to figure out now -- not next year -- how to raise the money and build the organizations you need to get your message to voters.

Back during the campaign finance debate, I said money is the "mothers milk" of politics. It was true then, it's true now -- and you can take that all the way to the dairy case!

We were warned.


38 posted on 03/27/2007 2:07:33 PM PDT by poobear (This "culture of corruption" has been festering on both sides for too long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Why? It seems to be very important to Rudyphiles, since they continually lie about Thompson's record.


39 posted on 03/27/2007 2:07:35 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Thompson/Watts in 2008!! Fear the Fred!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
hesitate or ameliorate

Actually, in that interview, he did seem less than anxious to elaborate.

Would Thompson lead the fight for a national ban on abortion?

What's his position on the morning after pill?

How about embryonic stem cell research?

Has he changed his position on early term abortions?

40 posted on 03/27/2007 2:11:03 PM PDT by Gelato (... a liberal is a liberal is a liberal ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-198 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson