Posted on 03/27/2007 6:03:10 AM PDT by Uncledave
Banning Legos And building a world where all structures will be standard sizes.
By John J. Miller
Perhaps youve heard about the schools that have banned tag. Or dodgeball. Or stories about pigs.
If so, you wont be surprised to hear that the Hilltop Childrens Center in Seattle has banned Legos.
A pair of teachers at the center, which provides afterschool activities for elementary-school kids, recently described their policy in a Rethinking Schools cover story called Why We Banned Legos. (See the magazines cover here.)
It has something to do with social justice learning.
My vision of social justice for children of elementary-school age is as follows: If youre tagged, youre it; if the ball hits you, youre out; and pig stories are fun, especially when told over microwaveable hot dogs.
But I try to keep an open mind, so I read the article on why Hilltop banned Legos.
As most aficionados know, Legos are made by a Danish company. The company name comes from the Danish phrase leg godt, which means play well. Lego became a national treasure and one of the strongest brands in the toy industry, wrote The Economist last year. Its colorful bricks are sold in over 130 countries: everyone on earth has, on average, 52 of them.
In their Rethinking Schools article, teachers Ann Pelo and Kendra Pelojoaquin describe how the kids at Hilltop built a massive series of Lego structures we named Legotown. I sensed that something was rotten in the state of Legotown when I read this description of it: a collection of homes, shops, public facilities, and community meeting places.
My children have spent a large portion of their young lives playing with Legos. They have never, to my knowledge, constructed community meeting places. Instead, they make monster trucks, space ships, and war machines. These little creations are usually loaded with ion guns, nuclear missiles, bunker-busting bombs, force-field projectors, and death-ray cannons. Alien empires have risen and fallen in epic conflicts waged in the upstairs bedrooms of my home.
Perhaps kids in Seattle, under the careful watch of their latte-sipping guardians, are different. But I dont think so.
At Hilltop, however, the teachers strive to make them different. We recognized that children are political beings, actively shaping their social and political understandings of ownership and economic equity, write Pelo and Pelojoaquin. We agreed that we want to take part in shaping the childrens understandings from a perspective of social justice. So we decided to take the Legos out of the classroom.
The root cause of Hilltops Lego problem was that, well, the kids were being kids: There were disputes over cool pieces, instances of bigger kids bossing around little ones, and so on.
An ordinary person might recognize this as childs play. But the social theorists at Hilltop saw something else: The children were building their assumptions about ownership and the social power it conveys assumptions that mirrored those of a class-based, capitalist society a society that we teachers believe to be unjust and oppressive.
Pelo and Pelojoaquin continue: As we watched the children build, we became increasingly concerned.
So they banned the Legos and began their program of re-education. Our intention was to promote a contrasting set of values: collectivity, collaboration, resource-sharing, and full democratic participation, they write.
Instead of practicing phonics or memorizing multiplication tables, the children played a special game: In the game, the children could experience what theyd not been able to acknowledge in Legotown: When people are shut out of participation in the power structure, they are disenfranchised and angry, discouraged, and hurt. ... The rules of the game which mirrored the rules of our capitalist meritocracy were a setup for winning and losing. ... Our analysis of the game, as teachers, guided our planning for the rest of the investigation into the issues of power, privilege, and authority that spanned the rest of the year.
After months of social justice exploration, the teachers finally agreed it was time to return the Legos to the classroom. Thats because the children at last had bought into the concept that collectivity is a good thing. And in Hilltops new Lego regime, there would be three immutable laws:
All structures are public structures. Everyone can use all the Lego structures. But only the builder or people who have her or his permission are allowed to change a structure.
Lego people can be saved only by a team of kids, not by individuals.
All structures will be standard sizes.
You can almost feel the liberating spirit of that last rule. All structures will be standard sizes? At Hilltop Childrens Center, all imaginations will be a standard size as well: small.
Anyone who thinks that capitalism is "oppressive" should be kept far away from children.
Can't you get basic sets of lego's? I know that's what I had growing up. My set didn't have laser turrets, etc...
I have no problems about being concerned about lego guns, But it sounds to me that instead of doing what's best for the kids, removing any lego guns from whatever sets they have, or buying the sets wthout the guns, they simply decided to make the kids suffer without.
Hmmmm, didn't some Danish cartoons upset the ROP? I'm guessing that has more to do with this than anything else.
Probably brought to you by the same people who play scoreless soccer and everybody wins basketball.
"Bobby kicked the ball into the unguarded goal! Hoorah! Everybody wins!"
YOU HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE BUT YOUR LEGOS!!!!!
This is happened a couple of weeks ago, but its still pretty damn amusing. Of course I don't have kids at this school either, YIKES! I'd rather them be taught by rabid wolves then these latter day bolsheviks.
Does this make any sense to you? After reading this article, I still don't quite understand the "crime" of Legos.
The quotes from the school officials sound like the musings of mental patients.
"The rules of the game which mirrored the rules of our capitalist meritocracy were a setup for winning and losing. ... "
This says it all. They resent 'winners'. Anti-capitalists come in three essential flavors. 1) Those who have less and are envious (irrespective of the reasons they have less), 2) Those who have tons and are feeling guilty (usually these people are beyond being affected by the politics they champion (or at least they think they are), and 3) Narcissists who are convinced that they have been chosen to 'lead' the people to peace and harmony, and want credit for it (read 'Hillary').
The kids in this school could use a visit from my old teacher Mrs. Gilmore. She explained communism and its inherent flaws in the following way: In Mrs. Gilmore's communist classroom, some kids do A work, some do C work, and some do no work. But everyone gets a C. We got it loud and clear.
Those state sanctioned child abusers who think that capitalism is 'unjust and oppressive' need to have a REAL laser turret jammed up their socialist rectums.
Pull the trigger and melt ALL that communistic sh*t.
Clear attempt to prevent kids from learning the concept of private property, one of the fundamental "building blocks" of our free and prosperous society. Communist endoctrination of little kids.
ping
Why don't the teachers donate their time since a salary is determined by supply and demand (capitalistic)?
Do the teachers own a home? A TV? A car? Aren't these the product of capitalism?
State differently, they should have East Germany in its heyday if these want to see the result of communism.
Banning legos, dodge ball etc is just silly IMO.
It's damn near impossible to make Kremlin-like or mosque-like onion domes with legos.
I just figured it was because the Danish Press ran cartoons derogatory to Moose-limbs.
There was a good previous thread on this. Can't find it. Shoot.
Hey! Teacher! Lego Kids Alone!
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.