"Weather Channel Climate Expert Calls for Decertifying Global Warming Skeptics," by Marc Morano, Inhofe EPW Press Blog, U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=32abc0b0-802a-23ad-440a-88824bb8e528
Ouch Heidi, that's one slap that's got to leave a mark on ya.
Sadly, the Discovery Channel has also gone down the road of junk science. They have some good programming but it's hard to watch anymore knowing that they're endorsing this global warming garbage.
I don't think the left will be so stupid as to actually draw first blood.
HERE is the "fundamental science of climate change"...
Climate Nazi Heidi Cullen
This is why I quit watching it. My Comcast cable has two weather channels, the regular one, on 27 and one on 101 that just runs the animated forecasts, no anchors, no talking heads, with some inoffensive music in the background. It gives the local weather all the time. Much better than having to listen to the groupthink indoctrination while waiting for the local forecast on the 8s.
The NAZIS are back... and this time they are a bunch of liberals weanies.
Ping
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
No it's not.
Is it not, therefore, ironic that Cullen and her ilk demand "scientific cleansing" of those who fail to toe the Global Warming Cult's line?
Cullen is an Inquisitor, a throwback to the days of the rack and the burning stake. Heresy to be punished in the severest of terms. 'Agree with us, toe the line, submit to the will of Gore and you will eat and be a be to provide for your families. Fail to submit and you will be crushed'.
The draconian tendencies of Cullen and her kind are terroristic and dictatorial. The Weather Channel should fire her directly.
I am a lifelong resident of the state of Oklahoma. I'm 42 years old. I'll be turning 43 in April.
My family has very deep roots here in Oklahoma.
I've lived here long enough to who does and does not represent Oklahoma's values.
Clearly Senator Inhof represents Oklahoma's values. Al Gore and Sen Boxer from California do not.
That's why the voters here Oklahoma re-elected him to his position in the Senate.
Al Gore is showing himself to be nothing more than a snake oil salesman for New World Orderism. Cleraly he's using this nonsense becuase he wants the Demorats to be able to gain control of people's lives.
I think you know and I know there's no such thing as man-made global warming. To say otherwise is pure B.S. and C.F.
This morning's (3-28-07) edition of the Daily Oklahoman had three letters to the editor in the editorial section. These people are nothing bu a bunch of clowns and goonies and there's simply no taking them seriously.
For that matter there's no taking anyone seriously who buys into this B.S. and C.F.
Either you represent Oklahoma's values or you worship at the Church of of Al Gore. Sen. Inhofe chose the former and for that I'm proud to call him a Senator from my home state, Oklahoma.
These three letter to the editor writers in this morning's Oklahoman worshiping Al Gore are all bald faced patholigical liars.
Regards......
It would seem, the good Doctor has some issues with the Coriolis force: in the Southern Hemisphere, hurricanes do rotate clockwise...
Propaganda Techniques Related to Enviromental ScaresIt may matter little that the expert is the only one in the universe with that opinion, if he or she is the only one whose opinions we hear. Sometimes politicians are persuaded to join in unfounded but politically advantageous rhetoric. If we like the source of an opinion, we are more likely to believe. So if a popular actor, media figure, politician, or local hero joins the process, more people will endorse the perceived reality... Like cult leaders, manipulators encourage us to close ranks and form an in-group suspicious of those who question the party line. Manipulators often try to control beliefs and actions by exploiting people's feelings. Inflammatory emotional rhetoric hardens attitudes against the opponent, and subtly justifies bending the rules to fight against the evil doer. Rhetoric that characterizes the opponent as a powerful bully... elicits a desire to root for the underdog, and provides emotional justification for bending ethical rules.
by Paul R. Lees-Haley, Ph.D.
The Debate Is Over
GOPUSA | March 26, 2007 | Doug Patton
Posted on 03/26/2007 12:08:10 PM EDT by yoe
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1806952/posts
The Green Inquisitor
Tech Central Station | 12/22/2003 | Neil Hrab
Posted on 12/23/2003 11:05:56 PM EST by farmfriend
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1045848/posts