Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 25 March 2007
Various big media television networks ^ | 25 March 2007 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 03/25/2007 5:15:31 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, March 25th, 2007

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Trent Lott, R-Miss.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Fired U.S. attorneys David Inglesias and John McKay; Sens. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., and Arlen Specter, R-Pa.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sens. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; former U.S. Attorney H.E. "Bud" Cummins.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb.; breast cancer specialist Dr. Eric Winer; breast-cancer survivors.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : Samir Sumaidaie, Iraqi ambassador to U.S.; John Bolton, former U.S. ambassador to the U.N.; Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah; Lanny Davis, former Clinton special counsel; Donna Brazile, Democratic strategist; Ed Gillespie, former RNC chairman.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: guests; lineup; news; sunday; talkshows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 621-640 next last
To: gov_bean_ counter

As a ten year Cancer survivor myself and having Family Members right now with very sticky situations Prostate Cancer (2) and probable Stage 2 Colon Cancer, plus recent removal of Squamous carcinoma from another Family Member, I believe that People like Edwards that sue everything/anyone they can for Money and profit are mostly to blame for the best Doctors leaving. They also make it bad on any decent Lawyer that wants the best for his client that actually has a case.


341 posted on 03/25/2007 9:38:42 AM PDT by samantha (The New Media fighting the DBM for our Sanity, Survival ,Soldiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: NordP

Thanks!


342 posted on 03/25/2007 9:39:16 AM PDT by samantha (The New Media fighting the DBM for our Sanity, Survival ,Soldiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Now it's beginning to make sense, great post here.


343 posted on 03/25/2007 9:39:40 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Or... we could use the Jimmy Carter option.


344 posted on 03/25/2007 9:39:41 AM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: samantha

It will be interesting to see what happens.


345 posted on 03/25/2007 9:40:55 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I am SURE that Chris Wallace asked DiFi about the fact that she had to get off that committee because of her husband's questionable dealings, right???


346 posted on 03/25/2007 9:41:10 AM PDT by Txsleuth (I don't know who I am voting for yet...just window shopping.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Oh boy... libs can't wait:

Iran crisis grows:
http://www.atlargely.com/2007/03/iran_here_we_go.html

Guess OpFor was right in the last paragraph:

If there’s one thing Iran knows how to do, its take hostages. However, the world’s a different place than it was in 1979 –and we have 130,000 troops parked next door. These days, the capture of troops-as-hostages is usually a casus belli (see Israel last summer with the initiation of a hot war with Hamas and Hizballah.)

It will be interesting to see how this plays out. Despite their domestic wobbly-ness, I expect the Brits to play hardball on this. We should play hardball too.

I also expect the anti-war crowd to forward the following premises: (1) the captured sailors were on a secret mission to attack Iran, which was only acting in self-defense when it graciously subdued them. (2) We should just do a hostage trade with the Iranians, trading captured Iranians in Iraq back to the Islamic republic.

http://op-for.com/2007/03/britain_knew_about_the_323_kid.html

Oh, pass this on to Teddy, Kerry and the dems:

Hmong of Laos need Patriot Act waiver

There are a number of credible reports that the 2001 Patriot Act's broad definition of a "terrorist group" is preventing thousands of Hmong refugees from being granted asylum in the United States, despite the fact that companion legislation passed the same year sought to make it easier for our allies in the Vietnam War to migrate here. Many of the Hmong of Laos are still fighting and on the run from communist enemies. Others are just now surrendering, more than 30 years after Democrats in the US Congress cut off funds to them in 1975.

http://www.redstate.com/

Things to remember re: Iran:

2004 8 British sailors and their craft were seized by the Iranians

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3828377.stm

Hmmm... interesting comment (I know, the French):

You should know that the French nuclear carrier Charles de Gaulle and its task force had rendezvoused with the USS John C. Stennis and it’s task force in the Arabian Sea Wednesday for joint missions in the global war on terror. Its arrival raises to four the number of Western aircraft carriers cruising within striking distance of Iran, including the USS Eisenhower and USS Boxer. The Boxer led group is a Expeditionary Strike Group with the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit on board… The 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (Special Operation Capable), or MEU(SOC), is designed to be the first on-scene in the event of crisis. It takes more than 2,100 men and women to form the 26th MEU (SOC) team.

The Charles de Gaulle is accompanied by French Task Force 473, which consists of five warships: the FNS Cassard guided missile destroyer, the FNS Tourville anti-submarine frigate, the FNS Dupleix destroyer adapted for escorting oil tankers and the FNS Marne, a command and supply vessel. Commander of the French task force is Rear Adm. Xavier Magne. Commander of the American flotilla is Rear Adm. Kevin Quinn.

A lot of hardware sailing there...


347 posted on 03/25/2007 9:42:32 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Stop Global Dhimming. Demand testicular fortitude from the hill. Call the crusade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
Exactly, and it makes him look very selfish and Lawyerly, although he may be in a form of "Shell Shock".
348 posted on 03/25/2007 9:42:40 AM PDT by samantha (The New Media fighting the DBM for our Sanity, Survival ,Soldiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Look for Halperin to join Politico.com

Thanks. He is still in ABC. One (mis)reporter apologized for his mistake about Edwards. Another (mis)reporter Mike Allen is yet to apologize for his wrong-reporting. Per his report - Gonzales is history by last week-end. Seems like they don't need to apologize, if they mis-report about the admn. or republicans - that 's what they 're doing all along.

349 posted on 03/25/2007 9:45:57 AM PDT by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: kabar
I'm not convinced that it would not be good policy to go ahead and bomb all of Iran's nuke making structures and every time they try and rebuild them re-bomb them.

The down side you point out, that they could simply buy them from other terrorist nations is irrelevant since they could do that now.

350 posted on 03/25/2007 9:46:15 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: altura

I am sure they are writing out their Donor checks now, and bundling (illegally) the checks of all their employees as we speak.


351 posted on 03/25/2007 9:47:59 AM PDT by samantha (The New Media fighting the DBM for our Sanity, Survival ,Soldiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: samantha
People like Edwards that sue everything/anyone they can for Money and profit are mostly to blame for the best Doctors leaving.

Very True.

352 posted on 03/25/2007 9:48:14 AM PDT by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas
I Knew that had to be you!! No one else could produce such a document dump!! Now what do we do! That's a weeks worth of reading there!!(thanks a bunch though)
353 posted on 03/25/2007 9:48:15 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok; All

Bill Maher on CNN...he just suggested that Hillary Clinton needs to run for POTUS on the campaign slogan "putting honesty and integrity back in the White House".


Tell me the left isn't delusional.


354 posted on 03/25/2007 9:50:23 AM PDT by Txsleuth (I don't know who I am voting for yet...just window shopping.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Assuming there ever will be any revenge. Usually this statement is merely a cover for political cowardice. Some 30 years later will still have taken NO action at all about the Iranian Hostage Crises.

"The U.S. Government, by Executive Orders issued by the President as well as by Congressional legislation, prohibits most trade with Iran. Some sanctions were imposed on Iran because Tehran is a state sponsor of terrorism, others because of the nuclear proliferation issues, and still more for human rights violations, including infringement of religious freedom. The commercial relations that do exists between the two countries consist mainly of Iranian purchases of food and medical products and U.S. imports of carpets and food. Some sanctions were temporarily waived in the wake of the devastating Bam earthquake of December 2003. U.S. officials and relief workers actively assisted in relief and reconstruction efforts."

We froze billions of dollars of Iranian assets in the US. We don't have diplomatic relations with them. Here is a good overview on specific things the US has done vis-a-vis its relations with Iran since the hostage crisis. To say nothing has been done is simply not true.

355 posted on 03/25/2007 9:50:33 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

I hear most of it is to keep oil tanker shipping lanes open.


356 posted on 03/25/2007 9:52:40 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911; kabar

JMHO, but I'd consider this Iranian nuke dilemma as the same type of situation as dealing with rattlesnakes.

Leave the rattles alone and aim for the head.


357 posted on 03/25/2007 9:52:40 AM PDT by Unrepentant VN Vet (.....still here on the butt end of the spear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
I'm not convinced that it would not be good policy to go ahead and bomb all of Iran's nuke making structures and every time they try and rebuild them re-bomb them.

Fortunately, you are not the one that needs to be convinced. Your policy would be a disaster and would never garner support politically, here or abroad.

358 posted on 03/25/2007 9:52:55 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
Sharon Eubanks, the fired attorney whom Chris Wallace interviewed this morning, showed what she was all about with her last remarks to Wallace. Said she was a 'career' employee and not a political appointee. Her seething arrogance was palpable. Chris pointed out that the judge hearing the case against the tobacco company said that the 120 million settlement Eubanks wanted wouldn't fly when Eubanks already could not even get the $10 mil the govt told her to settle for.
She epitomizes the bureaucratic minefield that the Bush administration deals with in implementing policy.
359 posted on 03/25/2007 9:54:16 AM PDT by mountainfolk (God Bless President George Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I've no doubt your are right about Elizabeth Edwards being on board with the decision.

I've always considered her another Hillary in pushing her husband's ambitions. She's probably smarter and more political than he is.

But speaking pragmatically, I just don't see this decision flying with the public.

It's not what most people would do, and they won't be able to relate to it.

Edwards didn't have a snowball's chance in global warming of winning anyhow. So he might as well look classy in withdrawing.


360 posted on 03/25/2007 9:55:28 AM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 621-640 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson