Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/24/2007 9:43:23 AM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Cicero; Admin Moderator

Can you check this one to be sure I've complied with the rules for Bloomberg? Thanks.


2 posted on 03/24/2007 9:44:24 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

To defend against a Sizzler one must build a giant sneeze guard.


3 posted on 03/24/2007 9:44:53 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=a5LkaU0wj714&refer=home


4 posted on 03/24/2007 9:45:37 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

I was reading about this the other day. The Iranians need to be dealt with before they acquire these, if they haven't already.


5 posted on 03/24/2007 9:47:42 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

Something doesn't add up here. Terminal phase (within 10nm) accelerates to mach 3 and is able to do defensive moves.....not at mach 3!


9 posted on 03/24/2007 9:54:58 AM PDT by Keyga8tor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

I read this yesterday linked from Drudge. It is frightening and the lack of aggressive action to address this by the Navy is disappointing and puzzling.

Aircraft carriers are awesome weapons but I have always questioned their ability to survive a massive attack by skimmer missiles. The high closing speed attributed to these skimmers makes it much more likely one would slip through.


12 posted on 03/24/2007 10:02:35 AM PDT by volunbeer (Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
The Sizzler missle is only subsonic!

See http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/navalmissile/3m54.asp

In 2005~06, the PLA Navy (PLAN) received six improved Project 636M (Kilo class) diesel-electric submarines which are fitted with the advanced ‘Club’ anti-ship weapon complex designed by Russian Novator Bureau. The system features the 3M-54E (NATO codename: SS-N-27 Sizzler) subsonic anti-ship cruise missile (ASCM) with a maximum range of 220~300km. The ‘Club’ weapon system is available in two versions: the surface-ship-based Club-N and the submarine-based Club-S, both of which employs unified combat assets – two types of anti-ship cruise missiles and a type of ballistic anti-submarine missile.

The ‘Club’ weapon system includes a number of different variant missiles including the anti-ship variants 3M-54 and 3M-54E1, and the anti-submarine variant 91RE1. It is still not clear which variant the PLAN is operating on its Project 636M Kilo class submarines. The 3M-54E1 is a 300km-range subsonic anti-ship cruise variant similar to the U.S. Tomahawk. The 3M-54E variant with a shorter range is based on the subsonic stage of the 3M-54E1 but use a rocket-propelled second stage which is released 20~60km from the target. This second stage then accelerates to Mach 3 to defeat ship defences. Both missiles in the ‘Club’ weapon complex use a common active radar guidance system and both fly a low-altitude sea-skimming mission profile. The missile is launched from the torpedo tubes of the submarine.

SPECIFICATIONS

 
3M-54E
3M-54TE
3M-54E1
3M-54TE1
91RE1
91RE2
Length (m) 8.220 8.916 6,200 8,916 8,000 6,500
Diameter (m) 0.533 0.645 0.533 0.645 0.533 0.533
Weight (kg) 2,300 1,951 1,780 1,505 2,050 1,300
Warhead (kg) 200 200 400 400 76 76
Range (km) 220 220 300 275 50 40
Max speed (Mach) 0.6~0.8; (terminal 3) 0.6~0.8 0.6~0.8 0.6~0.8 0.6~0.8 0.6~0.8
Guidance
Inertial + active radar
Inertial
Flight profile
Low altitude sea-skimming
Ballistic

This page was last updated 27 April 2006

20 posted on 03/24/2007 10:13:29 AM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head; SLB

Here's some food for thought.


29 posted on 03/24/2007 10:43:57 AM PDT by Stonewall Jackson (Sir, I protest! I am not a merry man! - Lt. Worf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

Pre-emption is the only viable option.


32 posted on 03/24/2007 10:51:08 AM PDT by Ieatfrijoles (Incinerate Riyadh Now.(Request shot splash))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
I thought CWIS was supposed to shoot down incoming missiles?
41 posted on 03/24/2007 11:33:21 AM PDT by quadrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

good article, mach speed is determinate on sea level and altitude, if the straights are 21 miles from shore, simple speed and time division scenarios make this a tough missle to beat. the chicom tendency to reverse engineer or create knock-offs makes this an exigent threat.


43 posted on 03/24/2007 1:14:51 PM PDT by InsNerd (Insurance Nerd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

Well, the reply would have to be along the lines of the phalanx system - gatling-type shotgun with tungsten or depleted uranium projectiles. The thing to work on is the time to the maximum speed of the automatic fire burst - it ought to be decreased to a fraction of a second, together with the deneral agility of the system. Sounds like doable work.


44 posted on 03/24/2007 1:35:17 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; Bean Counter; investigateworld; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
This is a low volume pinglist.

45 posted on 03/24/2007 1:39:21 PM PDT by magslinger (Submission? That's a bit of a problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero; ThunderStruck94

Would laser systems that are being developed for Israel work to defeat these? At the speed of light, evasive techniques would be useless.


61 posted on 03/24/2007 4:19:11 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Search for Folding Project - Join FR Team 36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

Guess it doesn't make any difference.

As long as the Democrats control the Congers, our best offense is going to be to run away as fast as we can.


63 posted on 03/24/2007 4:40:49 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson