Skip to comments.
CALIFORNIA: Judge rules state must stop running water pumps
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| 3/23/7
Posted on 03/23/2007 12:56:48 PM PDT by SmithL
Officials must first get permission to kill protected wildlife -
The state must stop running the giant pumps that send water to Southern California unless wildlife officials approve the continued killing of protected salmon and Delta smelt, a judge ruled today. The decision by Judge Frank Roesch of Alameda County Superior Court gives the state Department of Water Resources 60 days to get the necessary permission from wildlife officials. Granting permission could, in turn, require massive efforts to increase salmon and smelt populations elsewhere.
Many environmentalists blame the exporting of Northern California water for causing sharp declines in the number of some fish species in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. The pumps operated by the state are located near Tracy and send water to the San Joaquin Valley and Southern California.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: activistjudge; animalrights; environment; esa; nowaterforyou; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
1
posted on
03/23/2007 12:56:50 PM PDT
by
SmithL
To: SmithL
so astounding I can't help but laugh... thanks be that I don't live in that wacko state.
2
posted on
03/23/2007 12:58:20 PM PDT
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: SmithL
Welcome California to water restrictions like us in Texas.
3
posted on
03/23/2007 12:59:20 PM PDT
by
BigTex5
To: SmithL
Nothing like being slapped with a dead fish!...........
4
posted on
03/23/2007 12:59:21 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
To: theDentist
These idiots do realize they are hastening their own demise, don't they?
5
posted on
03/23/2007 12:59:36 PM PDT
by
Domicile of Doom
(Hey boy why is there dirt in my hole? I dunno Boss.)
To: theDentist
Ummmm....if they turn off the pumps, how many humans will die?
6
posted on
03/23/2007 12:59:58 PM PDT
by
patton
(ETS? Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.)
To: Domicile of Doom
Something smelt fishy about this.,...........
7
posted on
03/23/2007 1:01:25 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
To: theDentist
The judge didi it for the halibut. now, Californians are left floundering for a sole-ution........
8
posted on
03/23/2007 1:02:29 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
To: patton
I don't know, but think of all the other water-related necessities.... toilets, showers, bath-houses (hmmm, that may be a good thing), car washes, lawns, flowers, pools, bubblers, etc. All this because a judge cannot put things in perspective.
9
posted on
03/23/2007 1:04:33 PM PDT
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: SmithL
Um...so what am I supposed to drink? Ocean water?
10
posted on
03/23/2007 1:05:34 PM PDT
by
The Blitherer
(What the devil is keeping the Yanks? Duncan Hunter for President '08!)
To: patton
Ummmm....if they turn off the pumps, how many humans will die? None. But southern Californians might have to replace their lawns with rocks and cactus.
It's actually a bigger threat to central valley farming.
I'm willing to bet this doesn't apply to turning off the pumps when the rivers are near flood. Just turning them down during the dry season.
Lame reporters.
11
posted on
03/23/2007 1:05:39 PM PDT
by
Dinsdale
To: SmithL
Has anyone every actually proved that the pumps suck in a significant number of fish? Most salmon head north up the Sacramento to spawn, not down into the Delta where the pumps are. Plus, if the intakes for those pumps did not screen out fish and other things in the water, they'd get fouled and the transported water would be putrid.
12
posted on
03/23/2007 1:05:50 PM PDT
by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: The Blitherer
< Sam Kinnison > Move out of the desert! < /Sam Kinnison >
13
posted on
03/23/2007 1:07:50 PM PDT
by
Dinsdale
To: patton
how many humans will die? They're not an endangered species, dontcha know.
14
posted on
03/23/2007 1:08:34 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: SmithL
OOOOOOhhhhh....Delta smelt! Yummy!
LOL!
15
posted on
03/23/2007 1:09:34 PM PDT
by
Cold Heat
(Mitt....2008)
To: GOP_1900AD
It's the salt water intrusion into the delta that causes the most problems.
The southern Californians want to dig a canal around the delta so they can suck unlimited water from further up steam.
Northern Californians having watched what happened to the Owens valley say 'Not a chance in hell, pave over your lawns!'
At the end of the day you can caste this as enviro kook vs. S. Cal but it's not.
It's fisherman vs. farmer, with all of Northern Cal basically saying, 'No more summer water available hear, move along.'
16
posted on
03/23/2007 1:14:27 PM PDT
by
Dinsdale
To: The Blitherer
Um...so what am I supposed to drink? Ocean water?
Haven't you seen the GE commercials? They've been making ocean water drinkable for years now. Try as they might the environmentalist can never hold us down.
17
posted on
03/23/2007 1:15:15 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(I took one look at her unfashionable eyebrows and thought to myself, "she's literally crazy.")
To: Red Badger
For such baaad puns I throw at you this old worn sneaker (a family tradition).
18
posted on
03/23/2007 1:17:55 PM PDT
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: Jaysun
It's basically possible to trade a barrel of oil (or any other energy source) for a barrel of fresh water.
That's rarely a good trade.
19
posted on
03/23/2007 1:19:13 PM PDT
by
Dinsdale
To: theDentist
Filet of Sole?..............
20
posted on
03/23/2007 1:20:06 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson