Posted on 03/22/2007 1:36:48 PM PDT by meg88
I have an idea. Canada and Mexico can first adopt the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. THEN we can talk about North American Union.
"Mexican economist and researcher Miguel Pickard wrote in an article, published by foreign press, detailing the "deep integration" planned for North America. He said there will be no single treaty and nothing will be submitted to legislatures of the three countries.
Instead, he says, the plan for a "merged future" will be implemented through "the signing of regulations not subject to citizen review."
He went on to report of several secret meetings held in all three nations, after which representatives signed "close to 300 regulations" installing a "Unified American Border Action Plan."
"North Americanists" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue. "Canamexicans" would be better. ...and more accurate.
The North American Union can only happen if the U.S.A. ratifies the "Convention on Biological Diversity" treaty with the UN.
Does anyone have any idea what happens when the treaties are ratified at local and state level; but not Federally?
YES! Each Canadian province/Mexican state can separately apply for statehood. That's the ONLY way I'll accept a North American "superstate", which BTW, already exists as the USA. Canada and Mexico are economic/political/military midgets compared to us.
The "amnesty" being put forward in our Congress now is one of the elements of this scheme. See also:
http://americas.irc-online.org/am/386
http://www.suesupriano.com/article.php?&id=3
http://www.newswithviews.com/guest_opinion/guest99.htm
Actually it is called Unified North American Border Plan. AKA Smart Borders. One componant is Fast and Secure Trade(FAST).
Ideology? I guess if you consider our national sovereignty as an ideology.
Big problem with that. In the case of Mexico we'd be taking in over a hundred million third worlders from an entirely alien culture, many of whom would be only too happy to be recipients of big gov't programs/goodies. Iow, natural Democrat voters. In the case of Canada we'd be taking in mostly liberals. Again, Democrat voters. Our political spectrum would be shifted dramatically to the Left.
Acquiring the land of Mexico and Canada would be highly desirable, of course. But unfortunately that land comes with their people as well.
If you expect to find a Bush Administration declaration that the United States of America will be replaced by a North American Union, forget it. If you think such a drastic change in our nation won't happen without a national debate and voter referendum--think again.Last summer my Rep, Joe Wilson, held a town hall meeting on illegal immigration. After the meeting, which, IMHO, was very nonproductive, he took questions and I asked him what he knew about this. He said he had read some about it. But that I needn't worry as (paraphrased), "We've had no legislation put forth to fund or implement anything like this."A close examination of just a few facts shows that a legal and institutional framework is indeed being put in place that could easily be switched into a full-fledged regional government.
Step by step, America is moving from NAFTA - to the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America--and indications are the SPP will lead toward the creation of a North American Community as a logical precursor to a North American Union.
And there won't be. As stated in the article, most of this will be done via regulations that will not be put forth as legislation.
Slouching towards treason.
You have to look at this in order to understand why there are no border controls--and also why there are more americans killed by illegals than by the war in the middle east.
You have to look at this in order to understand why there are no border controls--and also why there are more americans killed by illegals than by the war in the middle east.
"I have an idea. Canada and Mexico can first adopt the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. THEN we can talk about North American Union."
As states and it would still be called the United States of America.
Would you believe ANARCHY? Certainly not federalism, or any semblance of orderly government.
bump
The problem is one of education and awareness. There are quite a few folks in both the US and Canada who are so enflamed with Europhobia, that they don't quite comprehend the uniqueness and beauty of English Common Law and Magna Cartian philosophy, which it the THING that sets many English speaking countries apart from all others. This failing leads to a broad disregard of those aspects of the US and the Canadian systems which hail from those 700 year old traditions and which are what we need to consider as the inner core of our national structures. Yet another reason why the Anglosphere concept needs to be promoted far and wide.
Hmmmm.....
This comes from the "Canada Free Press." An author trying to get a larger readership?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.